ChatGPT is bullshit, scientifically speaking
The bullshitter is the person using it, since they (i) don’t care about the truth of what it says, (ii) want the reader to believe what the application outputs.
Calling these inaccuracies ‘bullshit’ rather than ‘hallucinations’ isn’t just more accurate (as we’ve argued); it’s good science and technology communication in an area that sorely needs it.
Full article: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2024/06/29/chatgpt-is-bullshit-scientifically-speaking/
There are no comments yet.