This just reported today (Nov 11, 2022) by #UFO journalist George Knapp:
Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=FYfxwBQL69A
"FBI agents came down hard on the operator of a popular website devoted to all things Area 51--its programs, lore, and legacy. More than a dozen agents served a no-knock warrant on the Rachel, NV home of Joerg Arnu, owner of http://dreamlandresort.com."

"They seized all computers, files, phones, photos. At the same time, another team of a dozen or more agents stormed into Arnu's Las Vegas home, seized all digital devices and files, held his girlfriend at gunpoint."

"The warrants were served one week ago. Arnu noted on his site that he does not know the reason for the #raid or whether specific images of the secret base posted online may have initiated such a vigorous action by federal law enforcement. We are gathering more info." https://twitter.com/g_knapp/status/1590893322322968577

Hopefully, this is not the beginning of what intelligence operative Ronald S. Moultrie Rep. Darin LaHood discussed in the recent UFO congressional hearings ("UAP" hearings)--That is, how to legally deal with UFO "disinformation" and "misinformation" from American citizens or foreign entities.

[Obviously, this hearing was a nothing burger and just a continuation of the seemingly endless cover-up of the US government/military agreements and relationship with abducting ETs.]

In regards to what the intelligence operatives would deem "disinformation", Rep. Darin LaHood (R-IL) asked:

"...I would say there’s a lot of what I would call amateur interest groups that are involved in the UAP field. My question is--when there are unsubstantiated claims or manufactured claims of UAPs or kind of false information that’s put out there--What are the consequences for people that are involved with that, or groups that are involved with that?

Ronald S. Moultrie: "So one of the concerns that we have is that there are a lot of individuals and groups that are putting information out there that could be considered to be somewhat self-serving. We’re trying to do what’s in the best interests of 1), the Department of Defense and 2), what’s in the best interest of the public, to ensure that we can put factual based information back into the mainstream and back into the bloodstream of the reporting media that we have. So people understand what’s there."

"It’s important because we are attempting, as this hearing has drawn out, to understand 1) what may just be a natural phenomenon; 2) what may be sensor or phenomenology are things that were happening with sensors; 3) what may be legitimate counterintelligence threats to places that we have or bases or installations or security threats to our platforms."

Rep. Darin LaHood: "....So those, that misinformation, false narratives, manufactured, so what are the consequences? Are there legal consequences? Are there examples that you can give us where people have been held accountable by this misinformation or disinformation?"

Ronald S. Moultrie: "I can’t give you any examples where somebody has been legally held liable for putting something out there. But…"

Rep. Darin LaHood: "Well, I guess, what’s the deterrent from people engaging in this activity?"

Moultrie later states in regards to what can be done about all the "disinformation":

"....I think that’s part of what the group that we’re setting up now will be chartered to do. We're actually--from my organization we'll be looking at policy and standards that we have to come to you and work with you to actually put in place and promulgate across our government."

These excerpts begin at 104:40 in this video:
WATCH: Congressional Hearing on UFOs! - LIVE