#dontmakeproblemsoutofsolutions
i have tried to meditate for 2 hours in the morning, to little avail.
however the veil has falled harder, and i see my-self and all its evil.
for example, to get the 2 hours, i have to "establish myself in daily routine"
and that is so much for a householder.
therefore galactic society augments a world towards local householders--the tier 3 of satya-bound consciousness. this realizes connection with nature and allows for visitors with whom every local can share their traditions.
vaishna वैश्य comes from the same root as "vishnu" meaning that which penetrates. Where Visnu means "the immanent, vaishya would be "one who results from having settled somewhere", and later (as with the meanings of "guest" and "host(-ile)", transformed to include trade and hospitality.
For the Monotheist reasurrance, let us give both poly- and mono-theism the benefit of the doubt here.
Let's say that Vishnu does represent the principle of omni-penetration (inherance) theologically,
But we will also refrain from attributing Godhood onto his representatives.
Insecurities are allowed, confidence is silent.
Christians can therefore confidently engage in discourse with Hindus on a theo-logical basis while abstaining from Vishnu worship--the common referent shall be the principle of inherance. Thence we can speak freely in common discourse, and each can consider ones own faith God's personal challenge for your own soul's developed entanglement in material nature.
in kali yuga, everyone would work if it meant survival--too bad (gets good) the power-structure does not know how to make work. shudra means the foot of state, which today toes all humanity in our comon obsession with identity (states promising futures and pasts, the struggle to simply maintain a living space for one's own beloved)--therefore we should forgive all but the ignorant proponent, and give them the good world.
adligation: oblige the future to effect the past--the connection between a present-state's (2) future-state (3) and its former-state (1) is the negation of 2>3+1--where the future and the past are always greater than the present, because their existence is undeniable. Because it negates truth, rather than proposing a false truth, it is considered funny and the basis for humor.
threshold: the point beyond which a values-pair requires new ordinances from the control structure.
The bonds of identity and state exceed beyond the threshold of adligation>obligation threshold in the form of, for example, arranged marriages. This is to say that identity and state will exist for themselves as obligations for people in arranged marriages, whereas those who are not so obligated can mimic or return to them using adligation.
Soft-historicity hypothesis: the (equally necessary) approach to truth which regards qualities to be sufficiently ascribable (truthfrul) when based on traditions or telling alone. Truth is drawn from knowledge, not fact. It is necessary because it allows for local instances to be maximally truthful, whereas global truths may also be known.
Hard-historicity hypothesis: qualities ascribable to logic with logic suffice as logical truths and–if so weighted–facts.
When playful or genuine, adligation can find its place in society.
However once flirty and post-feminist (post equal-status/rights for women--therefore the locker-room talk can be extended to "equal" women) it can and should get ruled-out by the control structure--the well-known formula for divide and conquer: degrade values, fight fundamentalism. We are approaching the total rectification of values--the convergence event.
Because the adligation/obligation threshold is a threshold, the control structure has saught to abuse it (advertising sex--pushing the possibility to adligate beyond reasonable bounds (flirtation in general in society, rather than a private matter). But because this has occurred over so many values--humanity stands at the threshold of thresholds: the time for a Great Awakening. For the first time this can happen globally. We are the immune system winning the war against false truth--do not get sloppy.
"Either adligation or control-structure" does not mean one or the other: it means a balanced world where traditions can insulate themselves from a fluxus of potential in general--a world that is supported by local householders and common global traditions and liberties (individual/state rights and free communications/municipation).
For people are naturally free--and since adligation regards non-real entities (future state), as well as the past (by virtue of soft-historicity, own-truth) as non-real, it is naturally more correct. Obligation is 1+3>2, because it claims that a non-real entity (the past, debatable) and its counterpart (future obligation, human invention) are greater than the present moment.
This is the basis of all #states, because they require a statement and an approach to that statement, as well as someone to ascribe to. Often people will state things about the world that only apply to themselves. The difference between the bases (SHH, HHH) and states in general, is that any state can use both hypotheses arbitrarily, whereas perception requires both to trust reality at local and global levels. At a certain point even the hardest logician lets go and acts on impulse, and similarly even the severest fundamentalist will be capable of recognizing the need for own-interpretation (free-will). Furthermore, oral traditions and those in possession of the "flexible timelines" can and do listen to reason--however unless we have a higher instance (a local global order), then judgement becomes a failed mechanism, drawing out imagined future garden paths and losing the connection to reality, to the convergent universe--I do not say multiverse, unless you consider each human a world in themselves. Until our intentions are clean and clear, so that all can work together, then how shall anyone abide our brotherhood--let alone those unions which exist locally.
For man must stop killing man, so that any union can exist. Therefore we require the brotherhood of man--and for this common sense.
Know that divergence and a single person being right above all is an impossibility in the long run. The multitude of skills and advancement in this present decadent state is the exception that proves the rule. We are being blessed by the better Way, and should follow it to perfection, freedom, and liberty.
Adligation is 3*1<>2. Where it is given and acknowledged that the dignity of the present and all its company outweigh any of our imagined futures (because it is negating a truth, not proposing a false truth). Theologically this is the necessity of God's omnipresence (above all penetrating existence)--correct application of this to the right logical spaces, and proper leniency with it regarding non-global truths are necessary for peaceful planet. The * indicates that order matters. We have a future dictated by a past and adligation invites to a future-past, the adligator and the producer can laugh at their flirtation with a future more fixed than the past: perhaps because it aligns with tradition (1).