two circles,

one, "the socratic method's questions"

the other, "celestine prophecy's interogator drama".

from what perspectives do these circles,

align
partly overlap
touch edges
stay completely separte

and which would you select as the wisest perspective?

#philosophy #digitspolls
#socrates #thesocraticmethod #socraticmethod #celestineprophecy #celestineprophecyenergydramas #energydramas #interogative

(am i rly just out-sourcing my introspection here? lol)

---

some of my own musings on it...
worth remembering the energy dramas have their positive forms, so iirc, interogator just looking for their fix of energy becomes investigator looking for the augments for all's energy... so... maybe the socratic method can be considered stretching across both... and then a matter of where one might consider where a line of questioning is or is not socratic... are the "pre-socratic"/interogator just seeking to gain energy over? might one consider even a post-socratic;post-investigator state beyond that? and then, with these three, are they arranged linearly? or are there (defining(?)) portions that loop back even for more overlays? or does seem there be wisest perspectives seeing yet even all these as the same neat-fit aligned overlap? and what in the variety makes that wisest, rather than falls to follies? or even follies sought like some detrimentarian impetus/philosophy? ~ okay, that's drifting not just over-deepening, but off-topic, so i'll leave that as is for now. :)