..., there is another scenario in case if Russia is not defeated, but there is still a need to organise a #revolution there. One of the most effective instruments for such a #coup would be a #military #defeat of #Russia at some remote war theater. If it turns out that it is not possible to achieve such defeat fighting with convential weapons, without the use of nuclear weapons, it turns out that the American theory suggests the possibility of a so-called limited #nuclear-war, when the nuclear weapons … nuclear weapons are used in the territories not directly related to either the territory of Russia, or the US. That is, without risk of a nuclear exchange between our countries, all the way to a general nuclear war. But [instead] fight with tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of some other country. That is, for example, #Ukraine, #Poland, #Germany – nobody in #America cares about a small nuclear war there in order to defeat Russia with the use of nuclear weapons, well, and then it would lead to the overthrow of President #Putin. That’s how #NATO thinks.
source