#chemtrails #climateScam is an evil scam by the rich scum
Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lJBGYZGKTGY
Open Letter to the International Maritime Organization: Sulfur Reduction Regulations in Shipping Fuels Have Accelerated Global Warming
An earlier draft (attached) of our letter: "An Open Letter to the IMO Supporting Maritime Transport that Cools the Atmosphere While Preserving Air Quality Benefits" has been transmitted to the IMO Secretary General.
Source: Open Letter to IMO on Bunker Fuel Regulation has been Transmitted to the IMO
Here are Baiman’s proposals to the IMO:
1) Partially relax the IMO’s maritime bunker fuel sulfur emissions regulation for “high seas” maritime transport outside of Emissions Control Areas in ways that - as much as possible - would increase the global cooling benefits of sulfur or similar aerosols without causing harm to humans or natural systems, and
2) Require that benign tropospheric aerosol precursors such as sea water (referred to as the “marine cloud brightening method”) or other possible tropospheric aerosols (referred to as the “climate catalysts method”) that can be released from ships and that would replace the global cooling benefits of sulfur aerosols without - as much as possible - causing harm to humans or natural systems, be deployed in maritime transport (Baiman et al., 2023).
Translation:
1) Use bunker fuel out to sea (mid-ocean) and use low sulfur fuels near ports.
2) Require sea salt blowing machines on international ships for marine cloud brightening (MCB)
Bruh! Imagine the hubris of a retired economist trying to play God with the world’s weather and begging the IMO to empower #geoengineering at any cost.
Regional deployment of marine cloud brightening off the U.S. West Coast would be far less effective in the warmer world of 2050, and if implemented, could unleash higher temperatures in Europe and other regions, warns recent research.
The June 2024 modeling study of the controversial geoengineering technique shows “that a regional intervention will have large scale implications. So even though you’re applying [MCB] in a smaller space, the impacts [end up being] global,” says Jessica Wan, first author on the paper and a climate sciences Ph.D. candidate at California’s Scripps Institution of #Oceanography.
Source: Cloud brightening over oceans may stave off climate change, but with risk
Summation
Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) and Ship Tracks from bunker fuel are not adequate solutions for global warming. Both MCB and Ship Tracks are examples of pollution working as cloud seeding. At best, they may temporarily cool, at worst, they could destabilize weather worldwide and even lead to global conflict:
"Anytime we interfere with natural precipitation patterns, we set off a chain of events that we have little control over," he said, adding, "If we're not careful, unrestrained use of this technology could end up causing diplomatic instabilities with neighboring countries engaging in tit-for-tat 'weather wars'."
Source: Expert Raises Alarm Over #Cloud #Seeding: Could ' #Weather Wars' Erupt?
Learn more about MCB in my previous article:
San Francisco Bay Geoengineering Project
Marine Cloud Brightening, the Silver Lining Project, and the Great Barrier Reef Restoration Project.
