#astrophysics

rhysy@diaspora.glasswings.com

The spacecraft used Venus flybys to sling itself successively closer to the sun, and on April 28, 2021, it touched the corona for the first time. It was now the closest spacecraft to our star and the fastest human-made object ever launched. (In fact, last month it passed by the sun for the 18th time at a speed that would get you from Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles in about 20 seconds, and from the Earth to the moon in 36 minutes.)

From near Earth, the solar wind looks like a turbulent fluid that is loosely related to the sun at only the largest scales. But from up close, its structure directly reflects the structures on the solar surface. Instead of being a disorganized fluid, the near-sun solar plasma whooshes outward in streamlets that often match the sizes of the convective supergranules on the sun’s surface — the cells around which magnetic fields concentrate, amplify and escape into the corona.

During each solar orbit, the spacecraft zoomed through those streamlets, and it found a telltale fingerprint of magnetic activity that permeated the plasma and pointed to a source for the corona’s heat. Called “switchbacks,” these fingerprints were S-shaped structures formed by brief reversals in the locally measured magnetic field. Such switchbacks form (at least, according to most scientists) when closed magnetic loops collide with open magnetic loops and connect with them, during what’s known as an interchange reconnection event. As with good champagne in a bottle, the only way to release energy and plasma from a tangled, closed magnetic loop is to uncork it by breaking it open and reconnecting it with an open field line. These reconnection events generate heat and sling solar material into space — thus warming the corona and accelerating particles in the solar wind.

#Science
#Space
#Astrophysics

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-a-nasa-probe-solved-a-scorching-solar-mystery-20240429/

rhysy@diaspora.glasswings.com

Fun ! But someone needs to tell them they can use other words than "however".

Einstein's theory of general relativity predicts neutron stars to be lighter than three times the mass of our Sun. However, the exact value of the maximum mass that a neutron star can have before collapsing into a black hole is unknown. “Considering electromagnetic observations and our present grasp of stellar evolution, there were expected to be very few black holes or neutron stars within the range of three to five solar masses. However, the mass of one of the newly discovered objects precisely aligns with this range,” Buonanno elaborates.

In recent years, astronomers have uncovered several objects whose masses potentially fit within this elusive gap. In the case of GW190814, LIGO and Virgo identified an object at the lower boundary of the mass spectrum. However, the compact object detected via the gravitational-wave signal GW230529 marks the first instance where its mass unequivocally falls within this gap... None of the previous candidates for objects in this mass range have been identified with the same certainty.

Scientists can only make an educated guess as to how the heavier of the compact objects – most likely a lightweight black hole – in the binary that emitted GW230529 was formed. It is too light to be the direct product of a supernova. It is possible – but unlikely – that it was formed during a supernova, where material initially ejected in the explosion falls back and causes the newly formed black hole to grow. It is even less likely that the black hole was formed in the merger of two neutron stars. An origin as a primordial black hole in the early days of the universe is also possible, but not very likely. Finally, the researchers cannot completely rule out the possibility that the heavier object is not a light black hole, but an extremely heavy neutron star.

#Science
#Space
#Astronomy
#Astrophysics

https://www.mpg.de/21778967/0404-grav-mysterious-object-in-the-gap-152520-x

psychmesu@diaspora.glasswings.com

https://mastodon.online/@umplus/112175055235649848 umplus@mastodon.online - #UMPlus - Magical night in Atacama

https://www.universomagico.net/2024/03/noche-magica-en-atacama.html

Astronomer Petr Horálek has produced a magical image. The Atacama Desert has been the setting chosen to photograph a spectacularly colorful sky in which the bright stars, which give light to the sky, become the protagonists. In addition, the red color of the hydrogen atoms ionized by the energetic stars is distributed throughout the galaxy, tinting the.....
#astronomy #space #astrophysics #astrophotography

rhysy@diaspora.glasswings.com

A recent paper attempts to say that maybe the distance of NGC 1052-DF4 is actually 17 Mpc, not 20 Mpc after all ! GASP !

Why is this in any way interesting ? Well, DF4 was one of those galaxies claimed to lack dark matter. The distance in this case matters a lot : if it was at 20 Mpc, it'd be weird, but if it was only 13 Mpc, it'd be normal. Independent measurements have confirmed it's actually 20 Mpc, so it is indeed a strange object after all. But then, simulations found a way to produce such an object just by rare but physically-normal conditions : in the right circumstances, it is possible to strip the dark matter from a dwarf galaxy but leave its stars intact.

The authors of this paper say there should still be some signatures of tidal interactions left over though, so they go looking for them with incredibly deep imaging. They confirm that this is the case for the similarly-famous galaxy NGC 1052-DF2 (thought I'm skeptical of this), but very clearly show that DF4 is undisturbed. Absolutely nothing is going on in its outskirts at all. This is the reason they propose that the distance controversy might need to be re-ignited, noting that other galaxies in the region have been found to be at 17 Mpc rather than 20 Mpc.

To me this feels like a weak and circumstantial argument, and 17 Mpc wouldn't be enough to explain the lack of dark matter anyway. Not only that, but this ignores the now-sizeable population of other galaxies with similar claims for serious dark matter deficiencies.

#Space
#Science
#Astronomy
#Astrophysics

https://llittlephysicists.blogspot.com/2024/02/back-from-grave.html

rhysy@diaspora.glasswings.com

On arXiv today, a very nice paper shows that one of the largest optically dark gas clouds isn't quite optically dark after all : it has at least one small patch of very new star formation. It's optically pathetic but the data is good enough that it's definitely real. This has implications for the formation of the cloud itself, which now looks more likely to be the result of ram pressure stripping from one of the galaxies in the vicinity. Many questions still remain, however, not least as to why only a very small part of the cloud is forming stars and why it's apparently only just started doing so.

#Science
#Astronomy
#Astrophysics
#Galaxies

https://llittlephysicists.blogspot.com/2024/02/taking-galactic-paternity-test.html

rhysy@diaspora.glasswings.com

Excellent summary of the current state of the argument as to whether binary stars observed in Gaia favour dark matter or modified gravity. TLDW : prominent MOND supporter completely changes their mind and finds 16 sigma (!) significance evidence that MOND doesn't work. Previous test using the same data included points with much too large errors and found the opposite result. Doesn't actually validate dark matter, just disproves MOND.

#Science
#Astronomy
#Astrophysics
#DarkMatter

https://youtu.be/HlNSvrYygRc?si=wn9qI852Hd5DV7UQ