#complete

nowisthetime@pod.automat.click

#quote from #pa

Simple theoretical analysis of errors in the #CBDC concept:

What are the long term motivations behind the CBDC and are they justified?

#Complete #control over your spending habits resulting in:

Motivation1: ➜ indirectly trying to control human effects on the environment

Motivation2:➜ indirectly trying to evolve in to a different justice system: social credit score type?

Motivation3:➜ making sure everyone complies with the mainstream theories in science, politics, religion, etc

What’s wrong with the CBDC?

Control over each person till free will becomes a mere hallucination
No more real privacy
No more personal responsibility
Power in the hands of the few/AI?
Less polluted or more distorted world?

A) Motivation 1: Indirectly trying to control human effect on the environment

Well I think it’s logical that if things go wrong in nature: when there is suffering, when there’s destruction, pollution, chaos, etc. that one tries to look for the reason, the culprit, for all of this. By asking who/what is responsible for this mess on earth?

(Since reality is very complex not going to try to make any assumptions.)
Logically something; someone or some group of people or all people are responsible for the mess on earth …

Yet, it seems the CBDC is designed to put all the shame blame & indirect responsibility on the shoulders of the people.

Personally, I think this is wrong reasoning and a wrong way of trying to fix the mess.

Error 1 of the CBDC concept: putting responsibility & blame on the people instead of on the big companies.

For it are the big companies, those who produce things, that have the most impact on the products we use and how fast the change can go to more environmentally friendly products and packaging and living etc.

Motivation 1: Solution: Different method for achieving the same:

Thus I think that the reason for implementing the CBDC to ultimately get control over our pollution of the environment could much better be achieved if this responsibility, the severe control and need to change was put on the shoulders of the “big” companies.

The advantage of making companies responsible and controlled and not the users, is that the change would go way faster. The change to a world more in equilibrium with nature as well as forward evolution. It would give a smoother transition into a more balanced and prosperous world.

B) Motivation 2: Indirectly trying to evolve in to a different justice system: social credit score type?

Control up to this level over each individual will eventually miss its goal.
Because it’s a system that tries to be all knowing.
But the all knowing field “akashic records” do not work that way.
The all knowing field is, as far as I know, composed of all thoughts, all emotions, all events, all energies, …

No system or AI can replace the all knowing field. Thus no system will always make the right choices/judgements. But in merging with that type of power, because of its erroneous ways, it can destroy a lot.

Total and absolute control by a digital system will thus eventually only lead to more distortion and disbalance and thus disaster within the system.

This is the wrong way to use technology and AI to get to beter structures!

Motivation 2: Solution:

Is there another way forward to a more honest and just world in alignment with the highest capacity of humanity?

Can we evolve towards a new system wherein everybody counts?:

◉privacy = freedom of choice

◉choice = able to follow intuition, and have new ideas and inventions, unique expression of the soul, free from excessive control

◉safety: see https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1492918

◉indepence: equal distribution of resources, land (equal allocation of livable land), … See: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1447582

◉personal responsibility: need for higher awareness of interconnectedness, and our own effect on ourselves, our environment, each other, etc.
environmental responsibility: companies should evolve in to producing only environmentally friendly products and packaging and people should learn to live their lives with zero negative impact on this world and each other … in order to be able to live as free as possible and in balance with nature
See: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1550070

C) Motivation 3: Making sure everyone complies with the mainstream theories in science, politics, religion, etc

Correlates with trying to limit people’s privacy and thus freedom of choice. As a result people won’t be able to follow their intuition, have new ideas and inventions, unique expression of the soul. Thus it’s the opposite of creating freedom on this planet. It’s also the opposite of natural evolution. And it’s dangerous because all theories/opinions/beliefs are prone to flaws and changes over time … Thus enforcing one theory will always cause problems down the line.

Motivation 3: Solution:

Only higher awareness/consciousness of the interconnectedness of everything and everyone can solve this. But I don't know if it's realistic to get everyone to this stage of awareness.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU-QtcYWlTg
The #Clash 'Complete Control' (+lyrics)

bliter@diaspora-fr.org

#LEGO #Commodore #Amiga 600 #Laptop - #Complete - #Formula

top
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aG79SruI5o

I decided it would be fun to create an Amiga Laptop with a case made from Lego. It's been a long-term project with Howard at Dubious Engineering - / dubiousengineering

It's a project just for fun, let me know what you think.

Check out the Playlist of videos on the laptop Journey including the power system - • Amiga Laptop Project

#retrocomputer #Amiga600 #A600

ramnath@nerdpol.ch

#Planned #food #shortage

A devastating fire completely destroyed a flour mill in Oregon, USA (video)

Raw material shortages caused by severe drought in France could lead to milk shortages

Lebanese stand in long "offensive" lines for bread due to a shortage of the product
— The Netherlands will close 11,200 farms (20% of its farms) to meet climate targets

Opinion:

“The emergence of a “black market for food” more expensive than government rations – we will see this wherever there is rationing. The hostile takeover of the food supply is accelerating - the #complete #enslavement of #mankind - must be #stopped.

sylviaj@joindiaspora.com