#scotus

hankg@friendica.myportal.social

The thing that had me pissed off the most about this situation last night was the balance of SCOTUS now. The balance of SCOTUS has been my top voting issue since 2002. It has been a right leaning court my entire life. Ever since 2004 it has grown to the point where by objective metrics it is at least the furthest right leaning court since the beginning of the 20th century. It's possible to be the furthest right leaning court in the history of the United States. Yes, even further right than the Taney Court that gave us the Dred Scott decision. You think the decisions in recent years have been fucked up, buckle up. It's about to get way worse and if you are middle aged like me probably will be the rest of our lives. Now that Republicans have the Senate and the White House the two oldest conservative justices: Thomas and Alito, will probably be replaced with some 30-something far right ideologue sycophants. Think someone like Aileen Cannon, on the supreme court. They will sit there for the next 30-40 years. If you think that's bad, the 70 year old Sotomayor could easily have a health condition in the next 4 years requiring her replacement. The balance will get even further out of whack. I had hope that I could out live the tenure of all Trump justices even if there was little chance I'd be able to live long enough to see some of the worst decisions the SCOTUS has ever had: Citizens United, Dobbs, the one that gave near absolute immunity to Presidents as long as they say they are "acting as president" etc. There is no way for that to happen now. I'd have to literally live to be well into my 90s for that to even have a chance of happening now. And just barely a chance since the structural fucked uppedness of our system of government and the mental fucked uppedness of my fellow Americans too is going in a very bad direction. Which means there is a better than coin flip chance that these far right justices will be replaced with even further right justices over the coming decades. I'm angry not despondent generally because things change, elections happen, etc. But on this issue I am because short of a revolution overthrowing the government there is no way this will change in my lifetime, and I have to make peace with that fucked up reality. #uspoli #SCOTUS #rant

johnehummel@diasp.org

Not that we're surprised: Trump protected Kavanaugh from FBI investigation prior to SCOTUS appointment
Criminals protect other criminals who are useful to them. And nobody is more criminal pure evil than Trump

BREAKING: New Supreme Court scandal comes into spotlight

SCOTUS is, and has been for years, 6/9ths fascist thanks to Trump and especially Mitch McConnell, still the most dangerous person in American politics.

#Kavanaugh #Trump #SCOTUS #FBI #Crime #Fascism #OrganizedCrime

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1AqgvEqi20

prplcdclnw@diasp.eu

[gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/democracynow/2024/Oct/8/6](gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/democracynow/2024/Oct/8/6)

The original content of Democracy Now! Headlines appears under the Creative
Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 License (United States). For more, including their other
shows and media, visit www.democracynow.org.
October 8, 2024

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Texas Hospitals Cannot Be Compelled to Provide Emergency Abortions

In another blow to abortion rights, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday
Texas doctors cannot be compelled to perform emergency abortions if the
procedure is deemed to violate Texas's abortion ban. The far-right-led
Supreme Court, which overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, rejected the Biden
administration's invocation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor
Act, which requires health providers to intervene if a patient's life is
at risk.

#abortion #court #supreme-court #scotus #us-supreme-court #emergency-abortions #emergency-medical-treatment #texas

janet_logan@diasp.org

The Unholy Alliance: How Rightwing Preachers Are Weaponizing Our Courts

To keep this gravy train rolling along, the NRB and two rightwing churches just launched a federal lawsuit to overturn the so-called Johnson Amendment, part of the IRS’s tax code that says that when nonprofits engage in political activity they lose their tax-exempt status.

#ChristianTheocracy #RightWingCourts #SCOTUS #ChristianDominionists

florida_ted@diasp.org

Are they expecting a Trump win or an anti-democratic SCOTUS ruling?

  • U.S. business leaders are “in denial” about Vice President Kamala Harris’ growing lead over Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, according to C-suite advisory firm Fordham Global Foresight.
  • Founder Tina Fordham told CNBC that her clients are still betting big on the former president’s return, viewing him as the more pro-business candidate.
  • “They still prefer a Trump presidency and they still think it’s going to happen,” she said.

#Business #executives #Trump #election #victory #SCOTUS

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/15/trump-2024-business-betting-on-trump-win-c-suite-advisor-says.html

psych@diasp.org

Very interesting (and not funny). A historian & Constitutional framer speak to the vagaries of the Constitution on #SCROTUS

Yes! The Constitution Allows Changes to the Supreme Court – and Other Surprises with Lawrence Goldstone

When they’re in Philadelphia, there were certain hot button issues. One of them was slavery and one of them was commerce. But one of them, and one of the most controversial items they had to deal with was a national court system. Every state, as I said, had its own functioning judiciary. They didn’t want to give up power to a federal court system, but yet everyone knew they needed a Supreme Court. But a court system, if you believe that you were a citizen of a state and went to a district court, a federal court in a different state, it would be like trying to stand in judgment before foreigners. And so this became during ratification, this became one of the most controversial aspects. Here they are trying to figure out how they can have a court without a court system. So Article III ended up having only six paragraphs.

Interesting focus on Article III (short and vague) and providing #ContextAndPerspective on how the states were prodded into signing

#LawrenceGoldstone #Constitution #SCOTUS #ArticleIII #UShistory #history #Judiciary

beaubobobonobo@diaspora.psyco.fr

Via Kyle Griffin:

Leader Schumer will introduce the No Kings Act today — an attempt to reverse the #SCOTUS 's immunity decision.

The No Kings Act would make clear that presidents and vice presidents are not immune from criminal law and clarify that Congress — not the Supreme Court — determines to whom federal criminal law is applied.

janet_logan@diasp.org

Judge cites new Supreme Court ruling in blocking health care anti-discrimination protections for transgender Americans | CNN Politics

The Biden administration cannot enforce new anti-discrimination rules in health care for #transgender Americans, a federal judge in Mississippi ruled Wednesday, citing a recent landmark Supreme Court ruling that weakened the power of federal agencies.

Of course the first target of the "Chevron" decision was #trans people. Is anyone really surprised?

#SCOTUS #bigotry #HealthCare #discrimination

artsound2@diasp.eu

'Very Bad News' For Trump: Lawrence O'Donnell Says Ruling Could Backfire Quickly

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell on Monday predicted that the Supreme Court decision granting Donald Trump complete immunity for “official” acts while in office could backfire in a matter of weeks.

“The very bad news for Donald Trump in this decision today, and for candidate Trump ― very, very bad ― is that Mike Pence is going to walk into a federal courtroom, raise his right hand, take an oath to tell the truth and testify against Donald Trump in this case in September,” he predicted.

O’Donnell said the court granted Trump absolute immunity on a single paragraph in his indictment in the Jan. 6 case. The court ordered an evidentiary hearing for the rest of the case to determine if those other acts are official or unofficial, and therefore protected by immunity or not.

He said Judge Tanya Chutkan will oversee that hearing, which will be “exactly like a prosecution” as special counsel Jack Smith calls witnesses and lays out his evidence.

“You’re gonna see this incredible Jan. 6 hearing on steroids, possibly for 6-8 weeks, September-October, maybe,” he said. ...
Rest of article: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/lawrence-odonnell-trump-supreme-court_n_66837340e4b05d5a5eb30ec5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m_Rkop0noc
11:42 min #video (6:50 min in - bad news)
#SCOTUS #trump #immunity