#rationality

wazoox@diasp.eu

Richard Hanania on X: I encourage everyone to watch this. Dawkins versus Peterson is truly a microcosm of the decline of the public intellectual.

Dawkins, whatever you think of him, defines his terms and argues in a logical straightforward matter. Peterson is just spouting mystical gibberish.

Here he argues about the biological reality of dragons, or maybe dragons as a metaphor, but maybe not. You can’t follow along because there’s nothing there. Poor Dawkins is sitting there trying to have a real conversation, where you actually communicate ideas instead of putting on a show for the rabble.

Seriously. Watch this, and think about what’s going on here."

Say what you want, but Hanania is funny :D

#science #rationality
https://xcancel.com/RichardHanania/status/1850945127667396628?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

psych@diasp.org

More from the shape-shifting creature of the couch cats...

Cartoon by Clay Jones 🎯

#QuidProQuo in the Story-telling license to lie, for the sake of ... sake of... ?

Negating #truth & upping confusion & hate, so it would seem.
#GQP #TrumpVirus #VanceVirus versus #reality #truth #rationality #cats #couches #cult #disinformation #distraction

wist@diasp.org

A quotation from Dr. Seuss

Nonsense wakes up the brain cells. And it helps develop a sense of humor, which is awfully important in this day and age. Humor has a tremendous place in this sordid world. It’s more than just a matter of laughing. If you can see things out of whack, then you can see how things can be in whack.

Dr. Seuss (1904-1991) American author, illustrator [pseud. of Theodor Geisel]
“Author Isn’t Just a Cat in the Hat,” interview by Miles Corwin, Los Angeles Times (1983-11-27)

#quote #quotes #quotation #absurdity #humor #irrationality #nonsense #perspective #rationality #senseofhumor
Sourcing / notes: https://wist.info/seuss-dr/6241/

psych@diasp.org
digit@iviv.hu
wazoox@diasp.eu

What Are We Arguing About When We Argue About Rationality?

#rationality #science

I love this

If you’re seeking truth, you’re absolutely allowed to do what Srinivasan Ramanujan did when he discovered how to simplify a certain kinds of previously unsolvable math problem:

It is simple. The minute I heard the problem, I knew that the answer was a continued fraction. ‘Which continued fraction?’ I asked myself. Then the answer came to my mind

If we define rationality as “the study of truth-seeking”, this is good at the “truth-seeking” part, but bad at the “study” part. He got the right answer. The truth was successfully sought, the diamond was found. But he can’t explain to anyone else how he did it - he just has a good knack for this kind of thing.

https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/what-are-we-arguing-about-when-we