#doubt

wist@diasp.org

A quotation from Russell, Bertrand

I think nobody should be certain of anything. If you’re certain, you’re certainly wrong, because nothing deserves certainty, and so one ought always to hold all one’s beliefs with a certain element of doubt and one ought to be able to act vigorously in spite of the doubt.

Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) English mathematician and philosopher
Interview by Woodrow Wyatt, BBC TV (1959)

#quote #quotes #quotation #action #belief #certainty #doubt #overconfidence #skepticism #uncertainty
Sourcing / notes: https://wist.info/russell-bertrand/63283/

theaitetos@diaspora.psyco.fr

The Russians Call Out NASA

For decades, #Boomers who believe in the #Moon-Landing #narrative more firmly than they believe in #God, #Family, or #Country have argued that the landings couldn’t have been faked or the #Russians would have called out #NASA. But now the former head of the Russian space agency is doing precisely that.

The former head of #Russia’s #Roscosmos space agency, #DmitryRogozin, has expressed #doubt that the #US #Apollo-11 mission really landed on the #Moon in 1969, saying he has yet to see conclusive #proof.

In a post on his Telegram channel on Sunday, Rogozin said he began his personal quest for the truth “about ten years ago” when he was still working in the Russian government, and that he grew skeptical about whether the Americans had actually set foot on the Moon when he compared how exhausted Soviet cosmonauts looked upon returning from their flights, and how seemingly unaffected the Apollo 11 crew was by contrast.

#Rogozin said he sent requests for evidence to Roscosmos at the time. All he received in response was a book featuring Soviet Cosmonaut Aleksey Leonov’s account of how he talked to the American astronauts and how they told him they had been on the Moon.

The former official wrote that he continued with his efforts when he was appointed head of Roscosmos in 2018. However, according to Rogozin, no evidence was presented to him. Instead, several unnamed academics angrily criticized him for undermining the “sacred cooperation with NASA,” he claimed. The former Roscosmos chief also said he had “received an angry phone call from a top-ranking official” who supposedly accused him of complicating international relations.

Rogozin concluded by saying he still cannot believe that the US was able to pull off the feat, but is now unable to, despite the incredible progress in technology since the late 1960s. What he claims to have found out, however, was that Washington has “its people in [the Russian] establishment.”

Translation: NASA faked major elements of the space program and everyone in a place to know better kept quiet for fear of being targeted by #ClownWorld. But now it is becoming increasingly obvious and the official Moon landing narrative is rapidly crumbling.

I very much doubt this will be the only #historical #hoax to be exposed by the Russians over the next decade.

wist@diasp.org

A quotation from Havel, Vaclav

Isn’t it the moment of most profound doubt that gives birth to new certainties? Perhaps hopelessness is the very soil that nourished human hope; perhaps one could never find sense in life without first experiencing its absurdity.

Václav Havel (1936-2011) Czech playwright, essayist, dissident, politician
Speech, Salzburg Festival (26 Jul 1990)

#quote #quotes #quotation #absurdity #certainty #change #doubt #hope #hopelessness #life #logic #reason #sense
Sourcing / notes: https://wist.info/havel-vaclav/7228/

wist@diasp.org

A quotation from Jackson, Robert

Progress generally begins in skepticism about accepted truths. Intellectual freedom means the right to reexamine much that has been long taken for granted. A free man must be a reasoning man, and he must dare to doubt what a legislative or electoral majority may most passionately assert. The danger that citizens will think wrongly is serious, but less dangerous than atrophy from not thinking at all.

Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954) US Supreme Court Justice, lawyer, jurist, politician
American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442 (1950) [concurrence and dissent]

#quote #quotes #quotation #doubt #freedom #heterodoxy #intellectualfreedom #progress #reason #tyrannyofthemajority
Sourcing / notes: https://wist.info/jackson-robert-h/9998/

digit@joindiaspora.com

here's my #WordOfTheYear.

and, yes, not just #wordoftheday, or #wordoftheweek, or #wordofthemonth.
this word's my #2022 word.

Agnotology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnotology
#agnotology


here follows a handful of first lines from the definition blurbs from this websearch: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=agnotology+definition&kl=uk-en&ia=definition :

The study of culturally-induced ignorance or doubt, particularly the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data.

Agnotology (formerly agnatology) is the study of deliberate, culturally-induced ignorance or doubt, typically to sell a product or win favour, particularly through the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data

Agnotology is the study of culturally induced ignorance or doubt, particularly the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data.

Agnotology (n.) the study of culturally-propagated ignorance or doubt in provable fact

Agnotology is a branch of science which looks at the ways in which doubt or ignorance about certain subjects is created. A very good example of how this happens is the publication of scientific studies that rely on data that is inaccurate or misleading.


etymologically, my guess is the gno in there's like gnosis, like knowledge n learning. and the A before it, denoting an absence thereof, and the ology, being the study thereof.

and, i'll quote these two middle paragraphs from the simple english wiki page too, as i think they're excellent at highlighting what it is, and why it's important (not to mention the lesson from it to be applied to contemporary matters...) https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnotology ...

The neologism was coined by Robert N. Proctor,[1][2] a Stanford University professor specializing in the history of science and technology.[3] Proctor cites the tobacco industry's conspiracy to manufacture doubt about the cancer risks of tobacco use as a very good example of how this can be done. Under the banner of science, the industry produced research about everything except tobacco hazards to exploit public uncertainty.[4]

The way in which media attention works can be exploited to produce ignorance. Other factors that influence it are that corporations or governments do not reveal certain facts. At times, they force these facts to be removed if they have been revealed. The methods they use include censorship, destroying documents, putting the weight of certain facts differently, or being inattentive or forgetful.

#ignorance

#agnotology

#media #science #government #propaganda #deception #willfulignorance #masshypnosis #menticide #terror #weaponsofmassdistraction #inducedignorance #oblivious #oblivion #inattentiveblindness #misdirection #communication #conception #curiosity #attention#awareness #education #elucidation #information #disinterest #disregard #incuriousness #normality #apathy #newnormal #newspeak #intimidation #suppression #censorship #doubt #editting #study #research #publication #loopholes #jumpingthroughhoops #alltheliesfittopublish #alltheliesfittobroadcast #network #incuriosity #unconcern #conformity #fear #obedience #compliance #capitulation #culpable #complicit #OBEY

#overtonwindow