#tax

mkwadee@diasp.eu

This graphic from the #BBC is telling. It shows the percentage that various income groups in the #UK pay in #tax. What can't be overlooked is how much the #poorest end up paying as a percentage of their #income. So while the richest can boast how much they are contributing in absolute terms to government services, the poor are paying nearly as much as a percentage of their already meagre spending power.

#Economics #Politics #Tories #Poverty

gunnar@diasp.org

Google routinely evades tax by moving capitals to Bermuda,

and moving their EU profits to their Dutch or Irish companies. Over the years, it’s an estimate of 60 Billions $ that Google may have moved to Bermuda (20Billion Euros for the year 2017 alone!).

Google Chairman Eric Schmidt has claimed that [evading taxes in UK] is “capitalism” and that he was “very proud” of it.

“Google has been fined 2.42bn euros by the European Commission after it ruled the company had abused its power

by promoting its own shopping comparison service at the top of search results.” Yet while this amount of a fine -the largest by the EU- seems ridiculous in comparison to the companies’ profits (about 300M$ per day!) several EU investigations do not seem to advance very fast.

https://fuckoffgoogle.de/no-tax-no-law/

#google #tax

libramoon@diaspora.glasswings.com

https://www.nationofchange.org/2024/01/10/wealth-over-fairness-shocking-report-unveils-tax-favoritism-for-the-rich-in-41-us-states/

Wealth over fairness: Shocking report unveils #tax favoritism for the #rich in 41 #US #states
According to the #report, in 41 out of 50 states, the wealthiest 1 percent are subjected to lower tax rates compared to other #income groups.

Ruth Milka -January 10, 2024

..."The report contextualizes the current tax systems against the backdrop of recent trends in various states. Notably, several states have embarked on tax-cutting sprees, significantly reducing rates for #corporations and the #wealthy. This trend comes at a time when reports indicate that ultra-rich #Americans hold an estimated $8.5 trillion in untaxed assets.

In contrast to the prevailing trend, six states – California, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont – along with the District of Columbia, have implemented progressive tax systems. For instance, Massachusetts’ introduction of a millionaires tax led to a substantial improvement in the state’s ranking on ITEP’s Tax Inequality Index. Similarly, Minnesota has enhanced its tax policies for high earners while providing benefits for lower-income families.

Florida stands out as having the most regressive tax code in the U.S., with the wealthiest 1% paying a tax rate of only 2.7 percent, in stark contrast to the 13.2 percent rate for the poorest 20 percent. The lack of personal income taxes in Florida and similar states leads to a heavier reliance on regressive consumption and property taxes.

Recent years have seen a trend towards more regressive tax systems in many states. Kentucky, for example, has moved toward a flat tax system, resulting in significant tax cuts for higher-income families, offset by increased sales and excise taxes on a range of services and goods.

Some states are showing that tax regressivity can be addressed. New Mexico and Massachusetts have made notable progress through reforms to refundable credits and increased taxation of top earners. These efforts demonstrate the potential for policy changes to create more equitable tax systems.

The ITEP report sheds light on the pervasive issue of tax inequality across the United States. With 41 states taxing their wealthiest citizens at lower rates than other income groups, the study calls into question the fairness and effectiveness of current state tax policies. As ITEP’s Aidan Davis puts it, “The regressive state tax laws we see today are a policy choice, and it’s clear there are better choices available to lawmakers.” This conclusion underscores the need for a reevaluation of tax systems in favor of a more equitable approach."...

libramoon@diaspora.glasswings.com

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/tell-your-senators-to-become-original-co-sponsors-of-the-billionaires-income-tax

Tell your #senators to become original #co-sponsors of the #Billionaires Income #Tax

"Next week, Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) is widely expected to introduce his Billionaires Income Tax (BIT) to correct the absurdity of billionaires paying lower tax rates than many working people.

According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, the BIT would raise $557 billion over 10 years.[4] It would be applied annually to the growth in value of easily priced assets such as stocks, and to the growth in value of harder to price assets like private businesses when they’re sold.

This new tax would only apply to taxpayers whose net worth either exceeds $1 billion or whose income exceeds $100 million for three consecutive years.

This is a critical piece of legislation that would not only ensure that America’s 748 billionaires are paying income taxes each year―just like working people do―it would also help close the widening wealth gap in America: the richest 1% hold almost one-third (31%) of U.S. wealth while the bottom 50% has just 2.5%.

Click “START WRITING” to send a message to your U.S. senators urging them to become original co-sponsors of the Billionaires Income Tax to ensure billionaires start paying their fair share of taxes."

brainwavelost@nerdpol.ch

Here is the touchstone question in the history of all the #democracies of the west, and, incidentally, the trigger of many of their civil wars and wars of #independence – who should pay #tax to the state, who should decide, and how much?

About systems

salinger3@diaspora-fr.org

les inégalités n’ont eu de cesse de se creuser, au point qu’aujourd’hui, les 1 % les plus riches de la planète possèdent près de la moitié des richesses mondiales et que ces mêmes 1 % émettent également plus d’émissions de CO2 que la moitié la plus pauvre de la planète.

#taxtherich

La création d’un impôt européen sur la grande fortune répond à de nombreux appels de la société civile, de scientifiques et d’élus. Récemment encore, plus d’une centaine de députés européens, soutenus par des économistes, ont appelé l’Union à instaurer un impôt progressif sur l’extrême richesse. La future directive relative à la mise en place d’un niveau minimum d’imposition mondial pour les groupes multinationaux dans l’Union européenne a déjà montré que l’Union était capable de s’entendre pour plus d’équité fiscale. Plus généralement, la Conférence sur l’avenir de l’Europe a insisté sur la nécessité d’harmoniser la politique fiscale, et d’utiliser ce levier pour lutter contre la crise environnementale.

L’instauration d’un impôt européen sur la grande fortune nécessiterait trois interventions législatives :

  • une proposition de directive portant création d’un impôt européen sur la grande fortune
  • une modification de la décision 2020/2053 du Conseil du 14 décembre 2020 relative au système de ressources propres de l’Union européenne, qui aura pour objet de permettre à l’impôt européen sur la fortune de contribuer au régime des ressources propres de l’Union européenne.
  • la nouvelle ressource propre tirée d’un impôt sur la grande fortune devrait être affectée à une transition écologique et sociale juste, via l’alimentation des politiques de l’Union et des États membres consacrées à cet objet.

https://www.tax-the-rich.eu/home

#tax #impot #riche #UE #europe