#chatgpt

spektrum@anonsys.net

Eva Weber-Guskar stellt angesichts neuester Entwicklungen im Bereich der KI die Frage nach unseren Emotionen gegenüber Maschinen. Sie wird immer dringlicher. Eine Rezension

Eva Weber-Guskar stellt angesichts neuester Entwicklungen im Bereich der KI die Frage nach unseren Emotionen gegenüber Maschinen. Eine Rezension (Rezension zu Gefühle der Zukunft von Eva Weber-Guskar)#Gefühle #künstlicheIntelligenz #ChatGPT #LLM #LaMDA #Sprachsystem #Emotion #affectivecomputing #Maschine #Psychotherapie #Roboter #BigData #Software #Intimität #Algorithmus #Chatbot #PsychologieHirnforschung #ErdeUmwelt #ITTech #Kultur
»Gefühle der Zukunft«: Verliebt in einen Chatbot?

simona@pod.geraspora.de
rainerhgw@diasp.org

WTF ChatGPT?

Ich wollte nur das genaue Datum wissen, zu dem das Ehepaar Schlegel in Jena ankam.

Screenshot ChatGPT

  1. 1. sie kamen 1796 an
    1. Caroline war zu dem Zeitpunkt mit August Wilhelm Schlegel verheiratet
    2. Caroline war zu keinem Zeitpunkt mit Fichte verheiratet, dieser war mit Johann[a|e] verheiratet, von 1793 bis 1813

Kann man alles im Internet nachlesen. Dummes #Chatgpt, vielleicht solltest Du mal einen VHS-Kurs besuchen und den Internet-Führerschein machen?

Das ist ja unfaßbar. Es soll tatsächlich Menschen geben, die diesen Chatbots vertrauen.

hankg@friendica.myportal.social

Related to the end of my previous post. It's not that LLMs have no use. It's that everyone I know that likes them seems to forget about their error rates and how easily their hallucinations "sound right" but are so very wrong. It's even worse behavior than copy/pasting shit out of Stackoverflow or whatever the first search result out of AltaVista was in the early internet days. At least there there was some hope of auditing/correction at some point. None here. #media #ai #rant #chatgpt
Three bluesky posts on ChatGPT: "The most maddening work trend I am seeing with increasing frequency is team members answering questions with "this is what ChatGPT says," pasting the output in chat absent any personal expertise or context. If I wanted a hallucinating robot's opinion, I would have asked it myself. Shit's insulting."; "I know it's a common trope to have tech folks opine about leaving the industry to live in a cabin in the woods away from society, but the effects of this generative AI shit has done more to validate this stance in my mind than anything else."; "I've had colleagues ask me for information or help with problems and after I tell them they counter with what ChatGPT or Copilot says. Like WTF who cares. I'm not going to argue the case against like slop. Don't waste my time if you'd prefer the slop."

waynerad@diasp.org

ChatGPT topped 3 billion user visits in September 2024.

  1. google.com - 82.0B
  2. youtube.com - 28.0B
  3. facebook.com - 12.3B
  4. instagram.com - 5.7B
  5. whatsapp.com - 4.5B
  6. x.com - 4.3B
  7. wikipedia.org - 3.8B
  8. yahoo.com - 3.4B
  9. reddit.com - 3.4B
  10. yahoo.co.jp - 3.2B
  11. chatgpt.com - 3.1B
  12. yandex.ru - 2.7B
  13. amazon.com - 2.6B
  14. baidu.com - 2.4B
  15. tiktok.com - 2.1B

None of the other language models (Gemini, Claude, Meta, X.AI, Perplexity, etc) register on this global ranking -- ChatGPT crushes them all. Which is interesting to me as I use 8 LLMs (most of the time -- will probably try more soon) and ChatGPT doesn't consistently stand out as better than the others. But ChatGPT seems to have lept far ahead in terms of brand recognition with users.

ChatGPT topped 3 billion visits in September | Similarweb

#solidstatelife #openai #chatgpt

berternste2@diasp.nl

Here’s the deal: AI giants get to grab all your data unless you say they can’t. Fancy that? No, neither do I.

The Guardian

Data is vital to AI systems, so firms want the right to take it and ministers may let them. We must wake up to the danger.

(Text continues underneath the photo.)

Photo of smartphone with ChatGPT
The OpenAI logo on a laptop and ChatGPT on a smartphone. Photograph: Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto/REX/Shutterstock.

Imagine someone drives up to a pub in a top-of-the-range sports car – a £1.5m Koenigsegg Regera, to pick one at random – parks up and saunters out of the vehicle. They come into the pub you’re drinking in and begin walking around its patrons, slipping their hand into your pocket in full view, smiling at you as they take out your wallet and empty it of its cash and cards.

The not-so-subtle pickpocket stops if you shout and ask what the hell they’re doing. “Sorry for the inconvenience,” the pickpocket says. “It’s an opt-out regime, mate.”

Sounds absurd. Yet it seems to be the approach the government is pursuing in order to placate AI companies. A consultation is soon to open, the Financial Times reports, that will allow AI companies to scrape content from individuals and organisations unless they explicitly opt out of their data being used. (...)

Hele artikel

Tags: #ai #artificial_intelligence #ChatGPT #Claude #Gemini #Grok #OpenAI #data #opt-out #meta #facebook #instagram #google #alphabet #copyright #big_tech #lobby

waynerad@diasp.org

Looks like OpenAI has an answer to Claude's "Artifacts", which they call "Canvas".

"People use ChatGPT every day for help with writing and code. Although the chat interface is easy to use and works well for many tasks, it's limited when you want to work on projects that require editing and revisions. Canvas offers a new interface for this kind of work."

"With canvas, ChatGPT can better understand the context of what you're trying to accomplish. You can highlight specific sections to indicate exactly what you want ChatGPT to focus on. Like a copy editor or code reviewer, it can give inline feedback and suggestions with the entire project in mind."

"You control the project in canvas. You can directly edit text or code. There's a menu of shortcuts for you to ask ChatGPT to adjust writing length, debug your code, and quickly perform other useful actions. You can also restore previous versions of your work by using the back button in canvas."

"Coding shortcuts include:"
"Review code: ChatGPT provides inline suggestions to improve your code."
"Add logs: Inserts print statements to help you debug and understand your code."
"Add comments: Adds comments to the code to make it easier to understand."
"Fix bugs: Detects and rewrites problematic code to resolve errors."
"Port to a language: Translates your code into JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C++, or PHP."

Wait, into PHP? No, no, no, you should only be translating code out of PHP. PHP is one of the worst languages ever. It might even be worse than JavaScript.

No Go. Alrighty, let's continue.

"A second challenge involved tuning the model's editing behavior once the canvas was triggered -- specifically deciding when to make a targeted edit versus rewriting the entire content. We trained the model to perform targeted edits when users explicitly select text through the interface, otherwise favoring rewrites. This behavior continues to evolve as we refine the model."

It seems to me like this could be a first step in transforming "coders" into "managers" who "manage" an AI system that actually does the code writing.

For those of you who aren't coders and use regular language, they say:

"Writing shortcuts include:"
"Suggest edits: ChatGPT offers inline suggestions and feedback."
"Adjust the length: Edits the document length to be shorter or longer."
"Change reading level: Adjusts the reading level, from Kindergarten to Graduate School."
"Add final polish: Checks for grammar, clarity, and consistency."
"Add emojis: Adds relevant emojis for emphasis and color."

Introducing canvas

#solidstatelife #ai #genai #llms #chatgpt #openai