#covid-19

tom_s@friendica.ambag.es

Enthüllung: Alle RKI-Protokolle veröffentlicht - Pressekonferenz mit Velázquez Homburg und Barucker

Am Morgen des 23. Juli 2024 hat die freie #Journalistin Aya #Velázquez alle #Protokolle des #Covid-19 Krisenstabs des #Robert-Koch-Instituts(#RKI) veröffentlicht. Ein #Whistleblower der im RKI gearbeitet hat, hat ihr die Unterlagen und 10GB dazugehöriges Begleitmaterial zukommen lassen.

Um 10:00 folgte eine #Pressekonferenz zu dieser historischen Enthüllung. Zwei Mistreiter, der Finanzwissenschaftler Professort Stefan #Homburg und der freie Journalist und Pädagoge Bastian #Barucker, hatten die Protokolle im Vorfeld von Frau Velázquez erhalten und sie durchgearbeitet.

Alle Protokolle sind hier downloadbar: rki-transparenzbericht.de/
Alle Corona-Protokolle der Bundesregierung: corona-protokolle.net/
Blog von Aya Velázquez: www.velazquez.press/
Youtube-Kanal von Stefan Homburg: / @sthomburg
Blog Bastian Barucker: blog.bastian-barucker.de/

Meine Arbeit unterstützen: blog.bastian-barucker.de/unterstuetzung/

https://invid.ambag.es/watch?v=RRFjwgmn3Sc

part_of_you@diaspora.psyco.fr

Allé je la remet avec le lien

Le pouvoir judiciaire, incapable de rendre Justice, qui finit par admettre trop tard ce qui était évident : les mesures covidistes concernant les employés, qui ont été sanctionnés parce qu'ils refusaient de se faire injecter un produit expérimental, étaient illégales !
Le gouvernement a violé la loi ! Les entreprises ont violé la loi ! Les hôpitaux ont violé la loi ! Ils sont tous délinquants et rien de structurel ne sera fait pour prendre en compte ce scandale, sachant que ça n'est que la partie visible de l'iceberg ! Quasiment tout était illégal dans le plan sanitaire auquel la masse, inconsciente de ses droits, a obéi !


Le CPH de Nancy vient de donner, ce 03 juillet 2024, entièrement raison à une personne soumise à l’obligation vaccinale anti-Covid 19 imposée par la loi du 05 août 2021, qui avait refusé de se faire injecter et qui a donc fait partie des « soignants suspendus ».

Après l’avoir déclarée recevable et bien fondée en toutes ses demandes, la juridiction annule la suspension de son contrat de travail car prise en violation de son consentement libre et éclairé face à cette vaccination mais également en violation du secret médical auquel tout salarié a droit et dont seul le médecin du travail est détenteur.

En outre, le jugement martèle que la suspension viole les textes européens et internationaux tels que la Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme et notamment son article 8 (respect de la vie privée) mais également les articles 5 et 10 de la Convention d’Oviedo ainsi que la Règlement de l’Union Européenne du 14/06/2021 et la Convention N°111 de l’Organisation Internationale du Travail.

La salariée est intégralement indemnisée au titre des salaires non versés pendant la période de suspension illicite de son contrat de travail mais le Conseil de Prud’hommes va plus loin et condamne son employeur à lui verser 3.000 € supplémentaires au titre de ses préjudices matériels, 2.500 € en réparation de son préjudice moral et 2.500€ de participation à ses frais d’avocat.

Par une excellente motivation, extrêmement détaillée, la juridiction a également clairement rappelé qu’il est juridiquement FAUX de soutenir que la Loi du 05 août 2021 a été entièrement validée par le Conseil Constitutionnel et que le « vaccin n’a pas empêché d’être contaminé ni contaminant », que « personne ne connaît les effets indésirables et secondaires » et que « les vaccins n’ont et n’auront pas d’autorisation définitive de mise sur le marché » !!

C’est ce que nous soutenons sans relâche !

Au-delà des querelles politiciennes ridicules et stériles et d’une doxa insoutenable, c’est protéger notre Etat de #Droit et défendre nos Libertés Fondamentales qui est le combat essentiel.

https://www.nancy-risacher-avocat.fr/publications/nouvelle-victoire-devant-le-conseil-de-prudhommes-de-nancynbsp

#soignants #suspendus #covid #couillonavirus #covid-19 #justice #vaccins #vaccination #injections #médecine #santé

part_of_you@diaspora.psyco.fr

Le pouvoir judiciaire, incapable de rendre Justice, qui finit par admettre trop tard ce qui était évident : les mesures covidistes concernant les employés, qui ont été sanctionnés parce qu'ils refusaient de se faire injecter un produit expérimental, étaient illégales !
Le gouvernement a violé la loi ! Les entreprises ont violé la loi ! Les hôpitaux ont violé la loi ! Ils sont tous délinquants et rien de structurel ne sera fait pour prendre en compte ce scandale, sachant que ça n'est que la partie visible de l'iceberg ! Quasiment tout était illégal dans le plan sanitaire auquel la masse, inconsciente de ses droits, a obéi !

#soignants #suspendus #covid #couillonavirus #covid-19 #justice #vaccins #vaccination #injections #médecine #santé

gander22h@diasp.org

Ottawa Public Health seeking ways to continue wastewater testing

Mari Teitelbaum, a vice-president with CHEO, said the Ottawa children's hospital can use the data from wastewater monitoring to better help manage its resources.

"We were upping staffing in the emergency departments, how many isolation beds we needed, things like that. So this data has been incredibly important, and three to five days' lead time can make a big difference," she said.

[Medical Officer of Health Dr. Vera] Etches said the cost of wastewater monitoring can range from $370,000 to maintain the sampling seven days a week and report five days a week, to about $230,000 to sample and report three days a week.

#health #COVID-19 #pandemic #CBC #News #Ottawa

theaitetos@diaspora.psyco.fr

Not-Vaxx Never Mandatory

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that #California’s attempt to #mandate the #Covid-19 shots was #illegal and that Jacobson v. Massachusetts did not apply because the #not-vaxx is not a #vaccine and the state could not claim a legitimate state interest in #forcing #medical #treatments that do not provide immunity.

#HealthFreedomDefenseFund et. al have won a significant #victory in the #NinthCircuit, which reversed dismissal of their lawsuit challenging the Los Angeles Unified School District’s (“LAUSD”) #mandatory #vaccination policy for all employees.

Reversing the decision of the Central District of California in #LosAngeles, the Ninth Circuit majority held that, first, the case was not mooted by #LAUSD’s rescission of the mandate after oral argument last September, 2023. The majority called out LAUSD’s gamesmanship for what it was – a bald-faced attempt at avoiding an adverse ruling by trying to create an issue of mootness. On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the #SupremeCourt’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.

The majority, however, noted that #HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the #COVID #jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.

The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”

The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.

The court declined to give any deference to pronouncements by the #CDC that the “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.” As the court asked rhetorically, “safe and effective” for what? The majority pointed to HFDF’s allegation that CDC had changed the definition of “vaccine” in September 2021, striking the word “immunity” from that definition. The court also noted HFDF’s citations to CDC statements that the vaccines do not prevent transmission, and that natural immunity is superior to the vaccines.

In a separate concurrence, Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”

It’s important to note, since this will not be the last attempt to at #global #depopulation, that most of the pragmatic appeals to getting #vaxxed have turned out to have been based on #false assumptions and #illegal actions by #corporations and various levels of #government.

nowisthetime@pod.automat.click

#depop via injections that kill

Explosion of Childhood Vaccines Led to ‘Greatest Decline in Public Health in Human History’
Del Bigtree, CEO of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), referenced the significant increase in chronic illnesses that’s risen along with the number of childhood vaccines.

“In the 1980s, when we were giving 11 doses of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was 12.8%. Once we passed the 1986 [National Childhood Vaccine Injury] Act and we had the gold rush of vaccines explode ... the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease, skyrocket[ed] to 54%,” he said.3

However, that was in 2011 to 2012 — and might be even worse today. “We have no idea since then how bad this has gotten. But what you were looking at right there is the greatest decline in public health in human history,” Bigtree noted.4 He added:5

“None of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC’s recommended schedule ... was ever put through long-term double-blind placebo-based safety trials prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe.”

On the contrary, a number of studies suggest that unvaccinated children may be healthier than those who are vaxxed.

Vaccinated Children Have Higher Rates of Asthma, Neurodevelopmental Disorders and More
Dr. Paul Thomas, whose medical license was suspended due to his advocacy for informed consent regarding vaccinations, along with James Lyons-Weiler from the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), conducted a study comparing the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.6

Their findings revealed that vaccinated children experienced significantly higher instances of various health issues, including:7

Asthma

Allergies

Eczema

Sinusitis

Gastroenteritis

Respiratory infections

Middle ear infection

Conjunctivitis

Breathing issues

Behavioral issues

Notably, among the 561 unvaccinated children, none were diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), whereas 0.063% of children who had received some or all recommended vaccinations were diagnosed with ADHD.

“The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling,” they wrote.8 The study also points out that the rate of autism spectrum disorder in their practice was half that of the U.S. national average (0.84% versus 1.69%). The rate of ADHD in the practice was also about half the national rate.

According to the authors, “The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.”9

At the roundtable, Hooker added, “‘When you look at developmental delays, when you look at asthma, when you look at ear infections, when you look at allergies, when you look at ADD [attention deficit disorder], ADHD, autism,’ unvaccinated children fare ‘way better.’”10

Aluminum Toxicity Alone Is a Problem
There are multiple mechanisms of potential harm when it comes to vaccination. One of them involves aluminum, the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant.11 A demonstrated neurotoxin, aluminum is added to certain vaccines to increase the immune response and, with that, theoretically generate a higher response of protective antibodies.

However, repeated exposure to vaccine components such as aluminum could be harming children. As Hooker shared, “28 vaccines are given in the first year of life, one vaccine on the first day of life and upwards to eight vaccines when an infant is just 2 months old. If you look at the aluminum toxicity alone, it far surpasses the single-day toxicity limit for aluminum exposure in newborns.”12

A study funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that, among children with and without eczema, exposure to vaccine-associated aluminum was positively associated with persistent asthma. There was a 1.26- and 1.19-times higher risk of persistent asthma for each additional milligram of vaccine-related aluminum exposure, respectively, for children with and without eczema.13

Children who received all or most of the recommended childhood vaccines that contain aluminum received a cumulative aluminum exposure dose of more than 3 milligrams (mg). This group had, at least, a 36% higher risk of developing persistent asthma than children who received fewer vaccines, and therefore had a less than 3-mg exposure to aluminum.14

The study was observational in nature and stopped short of saying that it proves a link between aluminum-containing vaccines and asthma. The CDC also stated that it has no intention of altering its vaccine recommendations based on this study alone.15 However, the researchers pointed out that rates of asthma in U.S. children steadily increased in the 1980s and 1990s, then remained steady since 2001.

The 2001 date is significant, as most aluminum-containing vaccines were added to the childhood vaccine schedule before 2001. This includes, for example, diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP), hepatitis B, some formulations of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. According to the study:16

“There are many environmental and genetic risk factors for asthma, and any contribution from vaccine-associated aluminum has not been proven or supported through replication. However, because most aluminum-containing vaccines were added to the routine schedule prior to 2001 ... observed national trends in asthma prevalence during childhood are not incongruous with the effect estimates observed here.”

COVID Shots Caused 30 Child Deaths for Every One Saved
COVID-19 shots were added to the U.S. childhood, adolescent and adult vaccine schedules after a unanimous (15-0) vote by the U.S. CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). By adding the shots to the vaccine schedule, it paves the way for U.S. schools to require them for attendance.

Pfizer and Moderna, the shots’ makers, were also granted permanent legal indemnity, which otherwise would have disappeared once COVID-19 shots were no longer protected under emergency use authorization (EUA).17 Yet the shots have proven disastrous for children.

Hooker told the roundtable research shows “that for every one child that is saved from death from COVID-19, there are 30 child deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. So, the risk-to-benefit ratio in terms of mortality is 30 to 1.”18

A now-retracted narrative review published in the journal Cureus called for a global moratorium on mRNA COVID-19 shots,19 citing significant increases in serious adverse events among those who received the injections, along with an “unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio.”20

When factoring in absolute risk and the “number needed to vaccinate” (NNV), a metric used to quantify how many people need to be vaccinated to prevent one additional case of a specific disease, the review found “for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.”21

The authors of the paper also said the shots should be immediately removed from the childhood vaccine schedule, while boosters should also be suspended. “It is unethical and unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to a child who has a near-zero risk of dying from COVID-19 but a well-established 2.2 percent risk of permanent heart damage based on the best prospective data available,” the paper notes.22

Heart damage from the shots includes myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart muscle that can cause heart failure, abnormal heartbeat and sudden death. “Myocarditis is a serious disorder and 76% of all cases following COVID-19 vaccination, as reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS], required emergency care and/or hospitalization,” Hooker said. However, the “CDC significantly downplays myocarditis as a side effect of the vaccine.”23

#Health Agency ‘Never Submitted’ Required #Vaccine #Safety Reports to Congress
The roundtable discussion occurred as part of a larger discussion on “Federal Health Agencies and the #COVID #Cartel.” The group included medical experts, political figures, journalists and whistleblowers who accused government, media and Big Pharma of censorship and coverups related to #COVID-19 jab injuries.24

Hooker testified that the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to “report to Congress on the state of vaccine safety in the U.S. every two years.” However, he said HHS has “never submitted a vaccine safety report to Congress.”25

Hooker also reported that health agencies have data on health outcomes for vaccinated and unvaccinated children, but they refuse to make it public. The data, which includes close to 30 years’ worth of information on more than 10 million people, is housed in a database called Vaccine Safety Datalink.

Despite Hooker making more than 120 #Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and going through “congressional representatives to get the Vaccine Safety Datalink itself,” he says, “It is simply something that they will not do.”26 He believes financial conflicts of interest are the reason why:27

“CDC buys and sells $5 #billion worth of vaccines a year through the Vaccines for Children program. They also spend half a billion dollars a year ... advertising and through public relationship campaigns for vaccinations in general, as compared to a woeful budget of $50 million that is being used for vaccine safety every year.”

In a discussion on Steve Bannon’s “War Room,” Hooker added that, as it stands, public health agencies are not protecting the public from vaccine injuries — something to carefully consider in your own medical decisions regarding vaccinations:28

“The CDC, FDA and NIH (National Institutes of Health) are derelict in their duty ... to #protect #children and adults against vaccine injury in order to report to Congress the state of vaccine safety science, and their responsibility to the American public and to public health in order to protect the American public #vaccinescam

deutschlandfunk@squeet.me

WHO: Was das Pandemieabkommen bringen soll

WHO - Was das Pandemieabkommen bringen soll

Industrienationen und Entwicklungsländer verhandeln über ein Abkommen, das die Zusammenarbeit bei künftigen Pandemien besser koordinieren soll.#GESUNDHEIT #PANDEMIE #CORONA #COVID-19 #Impfstoffentwicklung #Impfstoff #WHO
WHO: Was das Pandemieabkommen bringen soll

gander22h@diasp.org

Do you need a spring COVID-19 vaccine? Research backs extra round for high-risk groups

Recent studies suggest staying up-to-date on COVID shots helps protect high-risk groups from severe illness

New guidelines suggest certain high-risk groups could benefit from having another dose of a COVID-19 vaccine this spring — and more frequent shots in general — while the broader population could be entering once-a-year territory, much like an annual flu shot.

Medical experts told CBC News that falling behind on the latest shots can come with health risks, particularly for individuals who are older or immunocompromised.

"Even when the risk of infection starts to increase, the vaccines still do a really good job at decreasing risk of severe disease," said McMaster University researcher and immunologist Matthew Miller.
...
That means:
* Adults aged 65 and up.
* Adult residents of long-term care homes and other congregate living settings for seniors.
* Anyone six months of age or older who is moderately to severely immunocompromised.

#COVID-19 #pandemic #CBC #news #vaccine #vaccines

pguillot@diaspora-fr.org

Il se fait vacciner 217 fois contre la Covid-19 et ne développe pas d’effets secondaires

C’est l’histoire d’un Allemand âgé de 62 ans qui, pour des « raisons privées », s’est fait vacciner 217 fois en moins de deux ans et demi. Cet habitant de Magdebourg a reçu, en l’espace de 29 mois, le plus souvent alternativement dans le bras droit et le bras gauche, un vaccin contre le coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Les vaccins injectés étaient ceux fabriqués par Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Moderna, BioNtech (BNT, BNT-BA.4.5, BNT-BA.1, BNT-XBB.1.5) et GSK/Sanofi. Ce patient, qui aimait trop les vaccins, a donc reçu différentes formulations (vaccins à ARN messager et autres). Un sacré cocktail vaccinal, étalé entre juin 2021 et novembre 2023 !

Ce patient, volontairement vacciné de façon hors norme contre la Covid-19, montre donc qu’une vaccination exagérément répétée ne perd pas de son efficacité. En effet, le système immunitaire, loin d’être épuisé, réagissait encore à la 217e vaccination, entraînant une augmentation modeste des taux d’anticorps IgG anti-spike. Pour autant, les auteurs de l’étude allemande déclarent « ne pas recommander l’hypervaccination comme stratégie pour augmenter l’immunité adaptative ».

Reste à savoir si ces résultats peuvent être généralisables à tous ceux qui, par jeu et/ou inconscience et/ou intérêt financier, ont pu frauder et multiplier volontairement le nombre recommandé de vaccinations anti-Covid.

https://www.lemonde.fr/blog/realitesbiomedicales/2024/03/06/il-se-fait-vacciner-217-fois-contre-la-covid-19-et-ne-developpe-pas-deffets-secondaires/

#vaccination #vaccins #covid #covid-19

stephane999@diaspora-fr.org

#vaccination #vaccins #covid #covid-19
« Comment les industriels ont dissimulé les effets indésirables graves des vaccins anti-Covid »
Cet article a été publié le 24 janvier 2024 après avoir passé normalement le processus de contrôle et d’évaluation par les pairs. Devant les pressions reçues en retour, il a ensuite été rétracté unilatéralement par la direction de la revue Cureus le 26 février. Illustration dramatique de la censure sévissant jusque dans les institutions scientifiques (et répétition de ce que nous avions subi en France lors de l’été 2021 lorsque nous avions déjà fait ces constats sur le seul plan statistique).
https://qg.media/blog/laurent-mucchielli/comment-les-industriels-ont-dissimule-les-effets-indesirables-graves-des-vaccins-anti-covid/