#cdc

ramnath@nerdpol.ch

https://www.bitchute.com/video/s6u6eiE4YEZ1

Josh Sigurdson reports on a #CDC #revelation showing that based on #statistics, taking 4 or 5 #covid #vaccines shortens a 30 year old's lifespan by around 24 years.

This data is public and easy to grasp based on growing death rates among the injected. Cleveland Clinic data showing no increase in risk among the unvaccinated also shows based on each vaccine, how much higher the risk climbs. 1 jab robs 30 year old men of 13 years. 2 jabs robs 30 year old men of 18 years. 3 jabs robs 30 year old men of 20 years. 4 jabs robs 30 year old men of 23 years. 5 jabs robs 30 year old men of 24 years. This rate is set to climb dramatically as yearly excess deaths among the injected get higher with each year-end count. This means, the more time goes by, even if you haven't gotten further injections, the risk of death goes up dramatically. This includes cancer, myocarditis, stroke as well as auto-immune disorders that lead to deadly ailments like shingles (which are currently being blamed on Monkeypox) and pneumonia. This is a crime against humanity and the studies seem to pour in by the day. A new bombshell court order has the FDA admitting to putting graphene oxide in the covid vaccines which for years they claimed was a conspiracy theory. It's right there on paper. Meanwhile, the state of Kansas is suing Pfizer for misleading the public about the risks of the covid injections. Pfizer has lost past cases regarding misleading the public but the lawsuits continue to build up. Will there be any actual justice? Not likely via basic lawsuits. Covid Czar Dr. Jay Varma was caught on camera recently claiming he was the one that convinced the #government to #lockdown and bring in vaccine mandates and that they were meant to "force vaccination" by making the public uncomfortable and discriminated against among social groups. Something that the government has continuously denied in the past, claiming "no one forced you to get injected." Varma also claimed that he had crazy secret sex parties while everyone was locked down. The evil just continues to present itself. Of course all of this is part of the same agenda to force the world into a transhumanist, technocratic wasteland of "convenience" and tyranny. From nano-technology in the vaccines to CBDCs and digital IDs, from social credit and carbon credits to food rations and the #Bird #Flu #hoax, from World #War 3 to Civil War. We are being corralled and #humanity is #under #attack.

theaitetos@diaspora.psyco.fr

Not-Vaxx Never Mandatory

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that #California’s attempt to #mandate the #Covid-19 shots was #illegal and that Jacobson v. Massachusetts did not apply because the #not-vaxx is not a #vaccine and the state could not claim a legitimate state interest in #forcing #medical #treatments that do not provide immunity.

#HealthFreedomDefenseFund et. al have won a significant #victory in the #NinthCircuit, which reversed dismissal of their lawsuit challenging the Los Angeles Unified School District’s (“LAUSD”) #mandatory #vaccination policy for all employees.

Reversing the decision of the Central District of California in #LosAngeles, the Ninth Circuit majority held that, first, the case was not mooted by #LAUSD’s rescission of the mandate after oral argument last September, 2023. The majority called out LAUSD’s gamesmanship for what it was – a bald-faced attempt at avoiding an adverse ruling by trying to create an issue of mootness. On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the #SupremeCourt’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.

The majority, however, noted that #HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the #COVID #jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 but only purport to mitigate COVID symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the COVID jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.

The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”

The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.

The court declined to give any deference to pronouncements by the #CDC that the “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.” As the court asked rhetorically, “safe and effective” for what? The majority pointed to HFDF’s allegation that CDC had changed the definition of “vaccine” in September 2021, striking the word “immunity” from that definition. The court also noted HFDF’s citations to CDC statements that the vaccines do not prevent transmission, and that natural immunity is superior to the vaccines.

In a separate concurrence, Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”

It’s important to note, since this will not be the last attempt to at #global #depopulation, that most of the pragmatic appeals to getting #vaxxed have turned out to have been based on #false assumptions and #illegal actions by #corporations and various levels of #government.

ramnath@nerdpol.ch

they are evil murderers forcing their #mask #madness
which causes death

https://expose-news.com/2024/02/13/cdcs-own-scientists-found-masks-ineffective-for-covid-but-agency-recommended-them-anyway/

January 2024 we are still reading that hospitals have asked visitors to its A&E department to start wearing face masks again. How can we ever trust medical professionals ever again knowing that they enforced measures that were not only unnecessary and useless, but also detrimental to our #health and #well-being? (see – The-Cloth-of-Compliance-is-Risking-the-Health-of-Our-Children.) Yet years down the line, those who we would expect to know better have shown they don’t, and are once again simply following orders and ‘questioning nothing. 

What hope have we got then when those orders come from the top and they are the ones questioning the evidence and undermining the scientists who provide it? Michael Nevadakis, PhD senior reporter for the Defender reports on an investigation by Paul D. Thacker in the Disinformation Chronicle who found that this is exactly what the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have done. The #CDC has #rejected their own #scientists’ studies on the effectiveness of facemasks in favour of political guidance.

CDC’s Own Scientists Found Masks Ineffective for COVID — But Agency Recommended Them Anyway.
By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

According to an investigation by independent journalist Paul D. Thacker published this week in the Disinformation Chronicle,, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention openly questioned the findings of its own scientists’ studies contradicting the agency’s public messaging about mask effectiveness.
CDC’s Own Scientists Found Masks Ineffective for COVID — But Agency Recommended Them Anyway.

part_of_you@diaspora.psyco.fr

‼️‼️Dernières nouvelles : Des révelations explosives ont émergé suggérant que le Forum économique mondial ( #FEM) avait l’intention de nuire avec les #vaccins contre le #COVID-19. (in English too in link)

Dans une révélation surprenante, il a été révélé que le ministère américain de la Défense ( #DoD) détenait des brevets liés à ces #vaccins dès 2016, exonérant ainsi l'ancien président Trump de toute responsabilité et laissant entendre que le ministère de la Défense l'avait trompé.

Les rapports indiquent que les personnes vaccinées souffrent d’une surcharge #cardiaque importante, entraînant de graves complications de santé.

Étonnamment, la #Nouvelle-Zélande a été témoin de foyers mortels où 100 % des personnes vaccinées au sein de certains groupes sont décédées en seulement deux heures.

Il y a eu une augmentation alarmante, de près de 50 %, du stress exercé sur les cellules cardiaques après la vaccination, une condition qui persiste pendant une période prolongée de six mois.

Cela aurait entraîné une augmentation du nombre de décès soudains et inexpliqués, des données alarmantes étayées par des études évaluées par des pairs.

Le développement de ces vaccins controversés est désormais lié à la Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( #DARPA) et au ministère de la Défense. En outre, 33 % des substances utilisées dans ces vaccins contre la COVID sont censées altérer l’ADN, ayant des effets permanents sur le corps des personnes vaccinées.

L’augmentation mondiale des cas de #myocardite, une inflammation du muscle cardiaque, est liée au développement de vaccins, ce qui laisse présager une crise sanitaire massive.

Ces révélations remettent en question la sécurité, l’éthique et les motivations derrière la campagne mondiale de #vaccination, suscitant des appels urgents à la responsabilité et à la transparence.

source: https://nitter.unixfox.eu/PolFabrice/status/1748327032809746868

#Davos #Davos2024 #OMS #WHO #Health #Billgates #Gates #BMG #pfizer #biontech #CDC #NIAID #Fauci #vaccinovigilance #couillonavirus #pharmacovigilance #injections #Canada #Toronto #mRNA #VaccineInjuries #DiedSuddenly #mortalité #surmortalité #mrna #pharmacovigilance #médecine #santé

ramnath@nerdpol.ch

Chief Nerd
enter image description here
@TheChiefNerd
🔥 BREAKING: Federal Judge Orders CDC to Release All V-safe Free-Text Entries to the Public

"A federal #judge in an incredible 29-page #decision has now issued an order requiring the #CDC to make every single one of those 7.8 million free text entries available to the public over the next twelve months. Every month they have to produce a few hundred thousand of them...It will be an incredible opportunity to actually see what was being told to the CDC by the public...I think this is gonna be the death blow to this #cover-up. It is clear that they've been hiding something and #now the #world is about to see what #people wrote in after getting the #vaccine."
#vaccinescam
https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1745639111476617628

part_of_you@diaspora.psyco.fr

USA - Les autorités ont surestimé les décès dus au COVID et ont exagéré la #pandémie.

Oh quelle surprise, aux USA aussi ! 🤡

Authorities overcounted COVID deaths and overhyped the pandemic.
After relentlessly calling it a "conspiracy theory", New York Times and CDC now admit:
Authorities overcounted #COVID #deaths and overhyped the pandemic.
About 1/3 of "official" COVID deaths, or hundreds of thousands of deaths, were not due to COVID.

https://nitter.fdn.fr/Olivierfente/status/1681270722960715776
#covid-19 #CDC #NYT #covid #médias #couillonavirus #mortalité #surmortalité #statistiques

nowisthetime@pod.automat.click

They didn't have COVID but were vented anyway, thanks to the baseless theory that you could have COVID-19 and be infectious without symptoms. Hospitals also received massive incentives to diagnose patients with COVID — whether they actually had it or not — and to put them on a vent.

Frontline #Nurse Blew the Whistle on Vent Misuse

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZgUFa48P5fwZ/

Some of you may remember Erin Olszewski, a retired Army sergeant and frontline nurse who blew the whistle on the horrific mistreatment of COVID patients at Elmhurst Hospital Center in Queens, New York, which was "the epicenter of the epicenter" of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S.

She described14 a number of problems at Elmhurst, including the disproportionate mortality rate among people of color, the controversial rule surrounding Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders, lax personal protective equipment (PPE) standards, and the failure to segregate COVID-positive and COVID-negative patients, thereby ensuring maximum spread of the disease among noninfected patients coming in with other health problems.

Olszewski also highlighted the fact that COVID-negative patients were being listed as confirmed positive and placed on mechanical ventilation, thus artificially inflating the numbers while more or less condemning the patient to death from lung injury.

Making matters worse, many of the doctors treating these patients were not trained in critical care. One of the "doctors" on the COVID floor was a dentist. Residents (medical students) were also relied on, even though they were not properly trained in how to safely ventilate, and were unfamiliar with the potent drugs used.

At the time, Olszewski blamed financial incentives for turning the hospital into a killing field. Elmhurst, a public hospital, received $29,000 extra for a COVID-19 patient receiving ventilation, over and above other treatments, she said.

If Elmhurst had infection control in mind when ventilating patients, they certainly didn't follow through, as COVID-positive and negative patients were comingled — a strategy Olszewski suspected was intended to drive up the COVID case and mortality numbers.

Killing for #Profit
Others have also highlighted the role of financial incentives. In early April 2020, Minnesota family physician and state Sen. Scott Jensen explained:15

"Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you'll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much."

Former #CDC director Robert Redfield also admitted that financial policies may indeed have resulted in artificially elevated hospitalization rates and death toll statistics. As reported August 1, 2020, by the Washington Examiner:16

"… Redfield agreed that some hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths … 'I think you're correct in that we've seen this in other disease processes, too.

Really, in the HIV epidemic, somebody may have a heart attack but also have HIV — the hospital would prefer the [classification] for HIV because there's greater reimbursement,' Redfield said17 during a House panel hearing … when asked by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer about potential 'perverse incentives.' Redfield continued: 'So, I do think there's some reality to that …"

In addition to receiving exorbitant payments for COVID admissions and putting patients on a ventilator, hospitals are also paid extra for:18

#COVID testing for all patients
COVID diagnoses
Use of remdesivir
COVID deaths

When everything is said and done, a COVID patient can be "worth" as much as $250,000, but for the maximum payment, they have to leave in a body bag. If we know anything, it's that profit motives can make people commit atrocious acts, and that certainly appears true when it comes to COVID treatment.

In the U.S., hospitals also LOST federal funding if they failed or refused to administer remdesivir and/or ventilation, which further incentivized them to go along with what amounts to malpractice at best, and murder at worst.

We need harsh, hard investigations with consequences — and activists need to write bills tying the hands of protocolists to prevent them from ever again killing one patient to hypothetically save another — under threat of a murder charge. ~ James Lyons-Weiler

Patient Rights Have Evaporated
There's also evidence that certain hospital systems, and perhaps all of them, have waived patients' rights, making anyone diagnosed with COVID a virtual prisoner of the hospital, with no ability to exercise informed consent. As noted by Citizens Journal in December 2021:19

"We now see government-dictated medical care at its worst in our history since the federal government mandated these ineffective and dangerous treatments for COVID-19, and then created financial incentives for hospitals and doctors to use only those 'approved' (and paid for) approaches.

Our formerly trusted medical community of hospitals and hospital-employed medical staff have effectively become 'bounty hunters' for your life.

Patients need to now take unprecedented steps to avoid going into the hospital for COVID-19. Patients need to take active steps to plan before getting sick to use early home-based treatment of COVID-19 that can help you save your life."

There Must Be a Reckoning
There's no telling how many COVID patients have already lost their lives to this medical malpractice, and it must stop. Patient rights must be reestablished and be irrevocable, we need to hold decision-makers to account, and lastly, we have to somehow ensure that our hospitals cannot be turned into killing fields for profit ever again. As noted by Lyons-Weiler in his January 2023 article:20

"We need harsh, hard investigations with consequences — and activists need to write bills tying the hands of protocolists to prevent them from ever again killing one patient to hypothetically save another — under threat of a murder charge.

We need legislation for 'on-demand' scripts for off-label medicines that patients want for potentially deadly infections — regardless of 'FDA Approval' (FDA does not, by definition, have to 'approve' off-label scripts."

COVID Treatment Guidance
While SARS-CoV-2 has become milder with each iteration, I still believe it's a good idea to treat suspected COVID at first signs of symptoms — especially if you've gotten the COVID jab. COVID hospitalization and death are now "pandemics of the vaccinated," to reuse and rephrase one of the globalist cabal's favorite mantras.

Perhaps it's the common cold or a regular influenza, maybe it's the latest COVID variant. Either way, since they're now virtually indistinguishable, at least in the early stages of infection, your best bet is to treat symptoms as you would treat earlier forms of COVID. Treatment for long-COVID also overlaps with the protocols for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Early treatment protocols with demonstrated effectiveness include:

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance's (FLCCC's) prevention and early at-home treatment protocol. They also have an in-hospital protocol and long-term management guidance for long-haul COVID-19 syndrome. You can find a listing of doctors who can prescribe ivermectin and other necessary medicines on the FLCCC website.
The AAPS protocol
Dr. Tess Lawrie's World Council for Health protocol
America's Frontline Doctors
Based on my review of these protocols, I've developed the following summary of the treatment specifics I believe are the easiest and most effective."

Sources and References
1 Medscape April 6, 2020
2 Business Insider April 9, 2020
3 The Associated Press April 8, 2020
4, 18, 19 Citizens Journal December 20, 2021
5, 12 Wall Street Journal December 20, 2020
6, 7 Newswise April 23, 2020
8 The Dossier Substack September 30, 2020
9 WHO Clinical Management of Severe COVID-19
10 #WHO Infection Prevention and Control for COVID
11 NBC News April 30, 2020
13, 20 Substack Popular Rationalism January 23, 2023
14 YouTube Perspectives on the #Pandemic 2020
15 Fox News April 9, 2020
16 Washington Examiner August 1, 2020
17 Breitbart July 31, 2020