#mainstreammedia

johnehummel@diasp.org

The real reason corporate media won't cover Trump's attacks on democracy

By D. Earl Stephens

[The following is copied verbatim in its entirely from the original, so I have not bothered to put it in italics. Instead, my (very few) comments are, like this one, inside square brackets.]

We need to talk about the abominable headline below, and how it is we have come to the fatal point where The New York Times and our broken mainstream media seem to need the America-attacking Donald Trump a helluva lot more than the America-attacking Donald Trump seems to need The New York Times and our broken mainstream media.

[The headline:] Trump Can Win On Character

During the past few, rocky years my feelings about the newspaper I grew up reading as a kid — the paper that influenced me more than any other to become a newspaperman — in the New Jersey suburbs have evolved from surprise, to shock, to disappointment, to anger, to rage, to complete revulsion ...

Aside from platforming maniacal, caustic headlines topping spurious content like the one above (which I promise to get to in a minute), this newspaper’s inability to spot the biggest news story of our lifetimes, and treat it with the heft it deserves, is journalistic malpractice, and a very real danger to our country.

The Times isn’t alone in its mishandling and disregard of the continuing attack on our country and its institutions that back it up. In fact, I can’t point to ONE so-called reputable news source in our “mainstream” media that has appropriately sounded the alarms, and given this perpetually breaking news story the treatment it demands.

There is not a single day that toddles by, when I don’t sit at my cluttered desk as the retired newspaperman I ultimately became, and stare at my keyboard wondering just what in the hell is being discussed in the newsrooms of our most foremost “news” operations in this nation.

Why have they abandoned us, and the most important story in the world?

Our country has been under steady attack for nearly four years now. Why aren’t our newsrooms on wartime footing? Bare minimum, why haven’t Democracy Desks been set up in these broken newsrooms staffed with journalists who do nothing but monitor the Republicans’ movements as they ruthlessly defend an attack on America, and go about annihilating truth, justice, and our right to even vote?

What news could possibly override monitoring the dangerous maneuvers of a sociopath, who is still free and on the loose after unleashing his rabid attack dogs to besiege our Capitol, stomp on law enforcement officials, seek out political leaders for harm and hanging, and prevent the certification of our vote, while doing nothing for three hours except root for the attack’s success?

Backed by his morally busted political party, the son of a bitch means to finish us off whether or not he ever gets power again. He is the literal definition of a terrorist and/or an authoritarian strongman — a thug. He bows to murderous fascists like Putin, and openly revels in their success.

There’s not a single thing I have typed here that isn’t completely true. So what in the hell is going on with our addled media, and their disgusting refusal to do their jobs?

Why just the the other day, this pathetic man outdid even himself when he illegally barged into Arlington National Cemetery for a photo op. He once again disgraced our fallen, who he has called “suckers” and “losers” to get his wrinkled, orange mug in front of a camera.

My God. Now let’s pretend what would happen if Joe Biden or Kamala Harris did something like that …

It has been more than 160 years since a threat like this presented itself in the United States of America, and we know how that turned out. Hundreds of thousands dead and wounded, an assassinated president, cities in ruin, and the very real chance that America would not be able to rebuild itself again.

She did, but all these decades later, still walks with a limp from that horrific period in her life.

We are but 69 days from repeating all this, though it could be even worse this time, because if the enemies of our Democracy win this election they will have successfully breached our Capitol, and will be setting up headquarters in our White House.

The repugnant Confederacy, thank God, never made it that far last time.

So I ask again: Just what in the hell is being discussed in all these newsrooms while Trump bangs the drums of hate, follows the roadmap created for him in Project 2025, and backstopped by a radical, bought-off Supreme Court, bolstered by known election-deniers, promises retribution to anybody who dares get in his way?

Since that terrible attack on our Democracy began four years ago, our broken media has given us almost nothing but normalization and capitulation.

How else to explain this headline and the story it trumpeted written by one of the NYT’s leaders in its editorial department, Deputy Opinion Editor Patrick Healy:

[The headline:] Harris Has the Momentum. But Trump Has the Edge on What Matters Most.

What matters most? You mean, the safety and well-being of our country and its citizens from those who would attack it?

Of course it didn’t mean that ...

That headline and the one I lead this piece with above topping an offensive, ridiculous slice of gaslighting by the ultra-Conservative Rich Lowry of the National Review, were splashed across the pages of The New York Times on Monday.

And let’s get this out of the way quickly: Yes, I understand that they were produced by the editorial department of this dumpster fire of a news source, but if that makes you feel any better about things, then they have you right where they want you: accepting that running this kind of propagandist bilge is acceptable.

It’s not.

It’s not from any news source that wants us to take them seriously, and displays the credibility that any reputable news organization must possess to serve its readership adequately.

My only plausible guess for the mainstream media’s failure to cover the attack on our country, besides sheer and incomprehensible incompetence, is that they are hedging their bets. Trump has been undeniably good for their bottom lines, which looks to me to be the only damn thing they truly care about.

If Trump goes away, so does the money. And what of the millions of dollars of tax cuts he’s promising to once again give the owners of these pompous rags?

Otherwise, there’s no making sense of any of this.

Regular readers will know that this is not the first time I have written about our media’s catastrophic failure to protect and inform us. And fair warning: Unless things radically change with the way our mainstream media comport themselves in the coming days, it won’t be the last.

I take these threats to our country and our media institutions very seriously, and I have learned many of you do, too. You (we) are owed a damn explanation for the greatest failure by our media in the 248-year history of our country.

We are furious about it, we have a right to be, and we deserve some damn answers PRONTO.

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. Follow @EarlofEnough

#AmericanPolitics #MainstreamMedia #NewYorkTimes #DerilictionOfDuty #Trump

tord_dellsen@diasp.eu

Chas Freeman Talks About the Attack on Russia's Strategic Defense System

Well I think there is a basic rule of statecraft in the nuclear age and that is that no great nuclear power can afford to appear to be undermining the nuclear deterrent or the strategic defense of a rival. And yet that is exactly what Ukraine apparently acting as a proxy for the United States is doing. It is attacking the Russian early warnings system which is an integral part of Russia's nuclear deterrent. And in this is a strategic assault on Russia, and it will probably draw a strategic reaction.

The fact that we have not seen a particular action from the Russians to date is not reassuring. It probably represents deliberations in Moscow about how to respond without starting World War 3, which is not an impossible outcome if this strategic rivalry continues un-controlled.

So this is a very serious development, it has as you indicated all the earmarks of a systematic effort to undermine Russian strategic security. Two attacks, two sites, I believe I may be poorly informed, that there are 10 such sites protecting Moscow. This represents an effort to knock out 20% of Russia's early warning system, it is not insignificant. And I also understand that unlike the United States which relies heavily on satellite space-born detection systems, the Russians are heavily dependent on these ground stations. So that the net effect of eliminating these is to reduce warning time very substantially, leaving the Russian leadership with almost no time to make a decision about how to respond to a detected possible attack.

This is particularly alarming because there have been in the past mistaken detections of such attacks and it has only been the actions of responsible officials on the Russian side - given the time to deliberate - that has prevented them from responding to a perceived nuclear attack with their own Counterattack on the United States and other targets.

[...]

The most remarkable thing reflecting the strategic complacency and lack of intelligence of much of the West is the extent to which this danger has not been identified in the mainstream media. I know that your own executive intelligence review has and the Schiller Institute have issued a warning and covered this issue carefully, but that is not true of the mainstream media, which suggests a level of military and strategic illiteracy on the part of the current crop of journalists that is quite frightening.

--- How Close is Nuclear War After The Attack on Russia’s Strategic Defense System – IPC Meeting #52

#ChasFreeman #NuclearWar #WorldWar3 #IPC #SchillerInstitute #Russia #Ukraine #NATO #UnitedStates #geopolitics #MainstreamMedia #CorporateMedia

eileen@despora.de

The Extradition Hearing of Julian Assange. The Power of Lies
The comments on Peter Oborne’s excellent article on Julian Assange in the Guardian last week are a damning indictment of the media’s ability to instil near universal acceptance of “facts” which are easily proven lies.
The Guardian chose as its “Guardian pick” to head the section a comment full of these entirely untrue assertions.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/extradition-hearing-julian-assange-power-lies/5781881

#Assange #Extradition #Hearing #MainstreamMedia #Untrue

dredmorbius@joindiaspora.com

I love a good conspiracy yarn as much as anyone. @Will Hill and Dr. Roy Schestowitz seem to push far into paranoia territory

The latest is this from Will: "Microsoft mouthpiece uses an old Gnome2 screen and lack of details to vilify gnu/linux".

Referring to this Verge article: "Russian malware infiltrated the Nasdaq servers, says Businessweek"

In it, Will claims:

We are supposed to think the crackers used gnu/linux and that Nasdaq's gnu/linux servers were infested with "a mess of malware".

I read the article and returned puzzled. So I asked Will:

Um. Where exactly in all of this is the insinuation that Bad People Use Linux?

His response:

When is the last time you saw a Gnu/Linux desktop screenshot on the verge? This is the first time I have.

The image, by the way, is this one best I can tell, which Will describes as "an old Gnome2 screen".

So I plugged the image into Google's reverse image search to see where it might possibly have come from. You know, stock art or something.

Actually, the source is an earlier Verge piece: "This is the most secure computer you’ll ever own". Which is obviously about Windows ME, right?

Um, no.

Tails is the secure system that protected Edward Snowden. Here's how it works.

From the moment you boot up, your computer leaves footprints....

Not this computer, though. It's running Tails, an open-source operating system designed to leave as little trace as possible, launching version 1.0 today after more than five years of open development. It's an amnesiac system, which means it's completely fresh every time you boot up. There are no save files, no new programs, and most importantly, it becomes a blank slate the moment you shut down. It's the digital equivalent of buying a new computer for a single session and tossing it into the river once you're done....

The desktop looks and feels like Linux (Tails is based on the Debian distribution), but the programs all lead you to privacy by default.

Yeah. The Verge are trashing Linux and Tails is only something Teh Badz Guise use. Um. No.

So, is The Verge, is clearly a highly focused technology website, right? Um, no. From its about page:

[Its] mission is to offer in-depth reporting and long-form feature stories, breaking news coverage, product information, and community content in a unified and cohesive manner.

You'll also learn it was founded in 2011 and is associated with Vox Media. I don't have a strong sense about Vox, but there's a Wikipedia Vox Media article. One of my favorite media watchdog sites, Sourcewatch.org has no dirt on them.

So, but still, The Verge are really biased against Linux and totally favor like Microsoft and stuff, right?

Well, there's a site search function, and using it I find (counts as of recently):

And looking at the competition:

Which is about the sort of mix I'd expect from a mainstream news site. You might compare these against other such, say, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, BBC, All Things D, etc.

The response from Will so far has been crickets, while best I can tell, Roy Schestowitz has elected to block me, though I can't say when, as he's no longer among my contacts and his user page is blank viewed from a logged-in session but not when accessed from another session:
https://joindiaspora.com/u/schestowitz

As I said: I'm all for a good conspiracy yarn, and I can tell you a few. Many do include a reasonable amount of mental elasticity, but I'm finding Will Hill is reaching so far that he's encroaching on Elastigirl, Stretch Armstrong, and Plastic Man territory. I really hope he doesn't hurt himself.

As for credibility, yeah, that's pretty much all shot to hell.

People, that's all you've got here. Exercise it.

And a musical interlude: Kinks: Destroyer.

#paranoia #conspiracytheries #theverge #linux #debian #ubuntu #tailsos #mainstreammedia