#nfts

jarnhandr@diaspora.glasswings.com

Bill Gates: NFTs "100% based on greater fool theory" • The Register

Non-fungible tokens for dummies

Want to buy nothing? You'd probably say no. That's because people don't like nothing, they like scarcity and status. In the digital world, scarcity doesn't work because data can be infinitely replicated.

But what if I faked digital scarcity? A database with limited spaces, each identified by a unique number. Think a line of people queuing for nothing. There's no value inherent in one spot over another, but I sell you a position in the queue. I'm not selling you the queue, or its destination (there isn't one), just the right to stand in this particular position.

You give me a dollar, and I give you some paper work, signed by yours truly, that says you have the right to stand there. Your position in the queue combined with my paper is a token that can't be recreated. There is only one of each position. It is, therefore, "non-fungible." The blockchain checks every single sale of a queue position and once you've bought your spot, it's listed on the blockchain. Want to sell your position to someone else? You can, and that transaction will be listed on the blockchain too.

Why would anyone want a spot in my queue? Well, what if I put up a poster next to your position? Every spot now has a unique poster, and buying a place in the queue means you can now stand next to that poster. You don't own the poster, you don't own the image on the poster, you can't reproduce the image, or sell copies, or claim any other type of ownership. What you've bought is the right to stand next to that poster – that's it. You can show your friends the receipt that says you can stand there. They might even think it's cool.

Congratulations, you now understand NFTs. Yes, it really is that stupid.

https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/16/bill_gates_nfts/

#NFTs #crytobaloney

lorenzoancora@pod.mttv.it

Video: NFTs Are Legally Problematic

by LegalEagle ft. S. Mould & Coffeezilla

This video is very easy to understand.

Key points:

  1. NBA Top Shots - this great NFT scam proves who promises NFTs might just take the money and run away with no responsibility
  2. Bored Apes and the like - in reality are just links to public hosted images the buyer does not own
  3. Click-Wrap Agreements - an NFT is equivalent to an hyperlink and you can't own an hyperlink
  4. Smart Contracts - are programs and not necessarily real, valid contracts. They cannot be enforced
  5. Copyrights - NTFs do not replace the copyright law and do not give the buyer copyright right, just a license to use something which might change at any time!
  6. Art created by artificial intelligence - cannot be copyrighted as law says only humans can create "art", another extra reason Bored Apes and the like are not art and cannot be protected by law
  7. NFTs - are a market manipulation to sell fake art by creating artificial scarcity in the market and people who buy them are getting nothing but a limited license, there is absolutely no consumer protection
  8. IPFS - makes the scam worse as the destination resource of those ipfs links embedded in NFTs smart contracts can change at any time

Conclusion: a wise buyer should not invest in non-fungible tokens.


Tags: #nft #nfts #crypto #market #boredapes #legal #video #ipfs #bitcoin #btc #ethereum #smart-contract #scam #fraud #tutorial #nonfungibletokens

joseph_teller@diaspora.glasswings.com

State securities regulators order virtual casino firm to stop selling NFTs

Cyprus-based Sand Vegas Casino Club and co-founders Martin Schwarzberger and Finn Ruben Warnke allegedly offered 11,111 NFTs in a "high-tech fraudulent securities offering" to fundraise to build virtual casinos in the metaverse. They also erroneously told potential buyers the tokens were not securities, the Texas State Securities Board said in a statement.

Another Day Another NFT Scandal Scheme Exposed

#NFTs #NFT #Reuters #SecurityRegulators #VirtualCasinoScammers #CryptoTheft #Texas #Alabama #SandVegasCasinoClub
#NFTCriminals #Scammers #OffshoreScammers

waynerad@diasp.org

"When a company like Nike finds someone using its brand without permission, it can ask the courts to order the unauthorized goods to be destroyed. Nike has done this in the past, but its latest trademark lawsuit comes with a twist -- the products it wants to 'destroy' are NFTs, which are inscribed permanently on the Ethereum blockchain."

"The best outcome for a brand that is seeking to have NFTs destroyed may be to have them sent to a burn address, which still does not actually destroy them but renders them incapable of being transferred anymore."

Nike wants to 'destroy' unauthorized NFTs -- how will that work?

#solidstatelife #cryptocurrency #nfts

joseph_teller@pluspora.com

The problem with stolen NFTs

From The Comments On This Video: "...without connection to the real world or a law. Who do you run too?
It is a free place where you can do what you want, oooh no my crypto coins were stolen and now my monkeys are gone too! To what police should this go?
It is like trading on a market full of Pirates and Thieves. Beyond "pirate honor" there are no real rules.
While in the real market yes you got taxation and there are rules regarding prices and systems. But at least if anything happens you can go to the police/judge/go through contracts and try to fix it."

NFTs are A SCAM.... As I Have Said Before... You Own NOTHING When You Buy One

#Technology #NFTs #NFT #JoshStrifeHayes #TechScams