#colonialism

faab64@diasp.org

Burkina Faso is fighting against a "Machiavellian system" created by the West, a Burkinabe activist says

💬 "Our enemy here [in Africa], we don't hide it, it's #France, it's #NATO. Our enemies are those who created international #terrorism by destroying #Libya and executing its leader, Colonel Muammar #Gaddafi," the Black African Defense League Coordinator in Burkina Faso Abdoul Sawadogo told Sputnik Africa.

On the occasion of the 64th anniversary of Burkina Faso's independence, which was celebrated on December 11, Ibrahim Traore denounced in his address to the nation the "imperialists" who seek to keep the people of Burkina Faso "in slavery".

🗣 "We are victims of our wealth, the wealth that imperialists want to seize at all costs, aiming to keep us in slavery. We will secure it," Traore declared from the Barsalogho town hall.

This is an important statement because it reaffirms Burkina Faso's determination to remain a sovereign and independent country in the face of external pressures, Sawadogo emphasized.

💬 "President Traore is basically addressing the former colonial powers and any entities that may try to interfere in Burkina Faso's internal affairs," the activist concluded.

#BurkinaFaso #Africa #Colonialism #Imperialosm #Politics

prplcdclnw@diasp.eu

[gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/voaheadlines/2024/Nov/19/https---www.voanews.com-a-mass-rally-opposes-proposed-new-zealand-treaty-reform--7868937.html](gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/voaheadlines/2024/Nov/19/https---www.voanews.com-a-mass-rally-opposes-proposed-new-zealand-treaty-reform--7868937.html)

Originally posted by the Voice of America.
Voice of America content is produced by the Voice of America,
a United States federal government-sponsored entity, and is in
the public domain.

Mass rally opposes proposed New Zealand treaty reform

by Phil Mercer

SYDNEY --

A nine-day march to protest race relations laws in New Zealand ended
Tuesday with a rally of more than 40,000 perople [sic] in the capital,
Wellington.

Introduced last week by New Zealand's center-right government, the
Treaty Principles Bill, would enshrine a narrower legal interpretation
of the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi.

The right-leaning government says a bill - or a proposed law reform -
would allow political and constitutional questions raised by the Treaty
of Waitangi to be decided by lawmakers instead of the courts.

However, some insist the measure would damage the rights of Indigenous
Maori.

Emmy Rakete is a lecturer at the University of Auckland's School of
Human Sciences. She told Radio New Zealand's Morning Report program
that there is great anger at the proposals.

"This is, kind of, the live wire underneath this country - the
fundamental contradiction between dispossessor and dispossessed and
colonizer and colonized, which has, kind of, been ignited again," she
said. "People are here in huge numbers. It is really beautiful to see,
actually."

The Treaty of Waitangi was signed by the British monarchy and more than
500 Maori chiefs, and it laid down how the two parties agreed to govern
New Zealand.

The controversy over the Treaty Principles Bill is how the document is
interpreted.

David Seymour, the leader of the libertarian ACT Party, a junior
partner in the governing coalition, introduced the reform to Parliament
last week.

He believes the treaty discriminates against non-Indigenous citizens.
Seymour told lawmakers its guiding principles need to be clarified.

"There was one big problem," he said. "Nowhere in the Treaty of
Waitangi Act and at no time since, has this Parliament said what those
principles actually are. The democratically-elected body of this
Parliament has been silent."

New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has described the bill
as "divisive" - despite being part of the governing coalition alongside
David Seymour's minor political party.

New Zealand is a Pacific nation of just over 5 million people.
Indigenous Maori make up about 20% of the population, but suffer high
rates of imprisonment and ill-health.

#new-zealand #māori #maori #treaty-of-waitangi #protest #wellington #indigenous-people #colonialism #british-empire #1840

See also [gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/democracynow/2024/Nov/19/8](gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/democracynow/2024/Nov/19/8)
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Waitangi

mlansbury@despora.de

Putin not interested in negotiations with Kyiv, he strives to destroy Ukrainian statehood - #ISW

Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) observe that Russian leader Vladimir #Putin is showing a clear lack of interest in a negotiated #ceasefire, remaining intent on #destroying #Ukraine's statehood

Quote: "Russian President [sic] Vladimir Putin continues to communicate that he is uninterested in a negotiated ceasefire and is committed to achieving his goal of destroying Ukrainian statehood."

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/11/1/7482413/

#Colonialism #RussianAggression #RussianWarCrimes #WarCrimes

faab64@diasp.org

The Myth of the U.N. Creation of Israel

UN Resolution 181 neither partitioned Palestine nor conferred any legal authority to the Zionists for their unilateral declaration of Israel's existence.

There is a widely accepted belief that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 “created” Israel, based upon an understanding that this resolution partitioned Palestine or otherwise conferred legal authority or legitimacy to the declaration of the existence of the state of Israel. However, despite its popularity, this belief has no basis in fact, as a review of the resolution’s history and examination of legal principles demonstrates incontrovertibly
#Israel #History #Palestine #UN #Britain #Politics #Zionism #Occupation #Colonialism #Revisionism
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/26/the-myth-of-the-u-n-creation-of-israel/

faab64@diasp.org

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions ( #BDS) Movement : We welcome the news that the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA World) has removed a bid to host its next world conference in apartheid #TelAviv and suspended the membership of complicit Israeli organization Aguda.

The Board of ILGA, a federation of 1,900 #LGBTQIA+ organizations in 160 countries and territories, voted unanimously to remove the bid by Aguda from the vote at its 2024 World Conference in Cape Town, South Africa, November 11-15.

The announcement of Aguda’s bid to host the ILGA World Conference in Tel Aviv as Israel commits genocide against 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza, escalates its violent apartheid rule over all Palestinians and conducts massacres in Lebanon, provoked widescale condemnation among ILGA member organizations and board members.

Former ILGA Secretary General Phumi Mtetwa withdrew as a keynote speaker from this year’s conference over the bid, saying, “Apartheid is Apartheid, and there's no room for negotiation or tolerance, especially not from within the LGBTQI+ movement.” ILGA board members have been vocal in their opposition, condemning the proposal as “trying to blatantly #pinkwash war crimes which does not represent our movement that stands in strong solidarity against any oppression.”

ILGA further voted to suspend Aguda as it reviews its compliance with the ILGA constitution. ILGA’s review process can come to no other conclusion than to expel Aguda and all organizations complicit in Israel’s crimes.

Aguda has a history of pinkwashing Israel’s crimes, even defining the Israeli #military as “one of the more progressive organizations in Israel” in terms of LGBTQIA+ acceptance during Israel’s genocide, and promotes activities in illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian #WestBank.

ILGA apologized for the anger and harm done to its communities, recognizing “the historical experience with #apartheid and #colonialism in #SouthAfrica: even the possibility of voting on such a bid in their home country would have been at odds with the unequivocal solidarity for the Palestinian people.”

We thank the many South African organizations and all #ILGA members who immediately recognized the Aguda bid for what it was, an attempt to pinkwash Israel’s war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, and pushed ILGA to do better.

#Israel #Palestine #Occupation #SanctionIsrael #StopGenicide #SavePalestine

https://loom.ly/IxLaD-4

faab64@diasp.org

From April this year. "First demonstration in #Israel of the 'Movement for Settlement in South #Lebanon'"...

"Doing this on a street corner in front of a McDonald's on seized #Palestinians land. What an encapsulation of what these people want for their entire #GreaterIsrael project. Biblical in scale in rhetoric, in practice, an extension of #suburbanlife on top of the corpses of 'Arabs"

Source: https://www.tumblr.com/labyrintho/764134118000869376

#colonialism #neocolonialism #Lebanon #Israel #Occupation #Israel #Politics

kuchinster@rusx.org

About the American Slave Trade

August 20, 2024 marks the 405th anniversary of slavery in the United States

August 20, 1619 - A ship brought the first 20 African Negroes to America, who were sold into slavery to the inhabitants of Jamestown.

The English privateer ship reached Point Comfort on the Virginia Peninsula. There, Governor George Yardley and his head of commerce, Cape Merchant Abraham Piercy, bought the “20-odd negroes” aboard in exchange for “provisions” - meaning they were trading food for slaves.

The year 1619 was a milestone in the long history of slavery in the European colonies and the beginning stages of what would become the institution of slavery in America.

The human cargo that arrived in Virginia in 1619 came from the port city of Luanda, now the capital of modern Angola. It was then a Portuguese colony, and most of the slaves are believed to have been captured during the ongoing war between Portugal and the Ndongo kingdom, as John Thornton wrote in The William and Mary Quarterly in 1998. Between 1618 and 1620, some 50,000 slaves - many of them prisoners of war - were exported from Angola. An estimated 350 of these captives were loaded onto a Portuguese slave ship called the São João Bautista (better known as the San Juan Batista ).

The ship was on its way to the Spanish colony of Veracruz when two English privateers, the White Lion and the Treasurer, intercepted it and captured some of the Angolans on board. According to James Horne, president and chief officer of the Jamestown Rediscovery , both vessels belonged to a powerful English nobleman, Robert Rich, Earl of Warwick. Rich was anti-Hispanic and anti-Catholic and profited from the disruption of Spanish shipping in the Caribbean. The White Lion, which flew the flag of a Dutch port known for its pirates, was the first to arrive in Virginia in late August 1619, followed four days later by the Treasurer.

Image/photo

These 20 captives are believed to have been the first African slaves to arrive in what would become the United States 150 years later.

Four hundred years later, the arrival of the captives influenced virtually every important moment in American history, even if that history was created around anyone but Africans and African Americans. After all, for many Americans, familiarity with U.S. history is tied to the arrival of 102 passengers on the Mayflower in 1620. A year earlier, however, 20 African slaves had been brought to the British colonies against their will.

“Historians, elected politicians [and] community leaders would prefer to represent the United States as some mythical, Anglo-Saxon Christian place,” said Michael Guasco, a professor of early American history at Davidson College.

In 1992, Toni Morrison told the Guardian, “In this country, American means white. Everyone else has to spell it with a hyphen.”

After 1619, most of the country remained white and relied heavily on the labor of Indian slaves and white European indentured servants. It wasn't until the late 17th century that the transatlantic slave trade made its impact on the American colonies. There are now 26.5 million descendants of Africans in the United States.

Image/photo

1661

The first anti-racial law - prohibiting marriage between the races - was passed in Maryland in 1661, shortly after slaves were brought to the colonies. By the 1960s, these laws were still in effect in 21 states, most of them in the South . Alabama was the last state to repeal its ban on interracial marriage in 2000.

Image/photo

Advertisement in Boston for a cargo of about 250 “fine healthy negroes” recently arrived from Africa on the slave ship Bunte Island. About 1700.

1776

The Declaration of Independence, which in its first lines stated that “all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights,” did not extend that right to slaves, Africans, or African Americans, and the reference to condemn slavery was deleted in the final version. Thomas Jefferson, himself a slaveholder, wrote these lines rejecting slavery; he deleted the reference after receiving criticism from a number of delegates who had enslaved blacks. This may represent “the fabric of the American political economy” since then, as some historians say.

Initially, slavery flourished on tobacco plantations in Virginia, Maryland and North Carolina. In the tobacco areas of these states, slaves made up more than 50 percent of the population by 1776. Slavery then spread to rice plantations farther south. In South Carolina, African Americans remained the majority until the 20th century, according to census data.

Image/photo

1860

The slave trade across the Atlantic, organized by the British, was one of the largest businesses of the 18th century. Approximately 600,000 of the 10 million African slaves made their way to the American colonies before the slave trade - not slavery - was banned by Congress in 1808. By 1860, however, there were nearly 4 million enslaved black people - 13% of the population - in the United States as the American-born population grew.

Image/photo

Eight of the first 12 U.S. presidents were slaveholders. Supporters of slavery supported the efforts of groups such as the American Colonization Society, which “sent back” tens of thousands of free black people - most of them born in America - to Liberia in the 19th century to prevent riots caused by the free descendants of slaves.

Image/photo

A painting depicting freed slaves once owned by Confederate President Jefferson Davis arriving at the “federal camp” at Chickasaw Bayou, Tennessee

1865

According to Abraham Lincoln, the Civil War was fought to preserve the integrity of America, not to abolish slavery - at least initially. American historians like to write that the Civil War was fought to free slavery, but slavery was not abolished after the war either. Lincoln entered the fight to free the slaves, some historians suggest, because he was worried that the British would support the south in its self-proclaimed self-determination and recognize the south as a separate entity. If he started a war to abolish slavery, it would have looked bad for the struggle of the south and the British supporting his cause. Lincoln's death was probably the first casualty of “a long civil rights movement that was not yet over,” suggested historian Peter Kolchin.

Image/photo

1868

Some experts argue that Reconstruction laid the groundwork for “the organization of new segregated institutions, ideologies of white supremacy, legal rationalizations, extra-legal violence, and everyday racial terror”-further widening the racial gap between blacks and whites. Others point out that the end of the war left black Americans free but their status “uncertain,” with the passage of “codes” that prevented black people from being truly free.

But eventually, under the 14th Amendment, African Americans were granted the right to vote. African Americans were also granted birthright citizenship: it extends to the descendants of freed black slaves and immigrants to this day.

1898

The recession of the late 19th century hit the United States. The Knight Riders marched in the dark, burning the homes of African Americans who had bought their own land. They came to Washington to demand change, as southern white Democrats had abolished many of the, albeit limited, freedoms of Reconstruction just a couple decades before.

The era of Jim Crow segregation prohibited African Americans from drinking from the same water fountains, eating in the same restaurants, or attending the same schools as white Americans, all of which lasted until the 1960s, and sometimes much longer.

Image/photo

1926

As African Americans were denied jobs and opportunities during the Jim Crow era, and as more jobs became available in the North and Midwest, more than 2 million southern African Americans migrated after World War I. Yet, even hundreds of miles away from southern segregation, these migrating Americans encountered “sunset cities,” where black people were not welcome after sundown, and restrictions on where they could live in cities.

For example, Oregon's constitution did not remove the clause prohibiting blacks from entering the state until 1926.

Image/photo

A man drinks water from a cooler for “coloreds” at a bus station in Oklahoma City in July 1939. Photo: Russell Lee

1954

As the end of the Jim Crow era and the civil rights struggle neared, the struggle continued. For example: it was not until 1948 that the U.S. Army desegregated by presidential decree. In 1954, in the Brown v. Board of Education decision, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional and schools should be integrated. Civil rights leaders led marches against segregation across the country in the 1960s. In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law. Getting African American children into white schools in white neighborhoods was considered constitutional.

Image/photo

African Americans vote for the first time since 1890 in the 1946 Democratic primary in Georgia.

1965

“Slavery was gone, but Jim Crow was alive. Almost all southern African Americans were excluded from the ballot box and the political power it could give,” Edward E. Baptiste wrote in Half Never Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 attempted to remedy this by prohibiting racial discrimination in voting and imposing restrictions on a number of Southern states if they tried to change voting rights laws. These restrictions were recently overturned by a 2013 Supreme Court ruling.

Since the publication of Ta-Nehisi Coates' book The Case for Reparations in 2014, the topic of settling financial debts for 250 years of slavery has risen up the political agenda. Proponents of a financial settlement for the descendants of slaves say it is meant to address the racial inequality that still persists in the United States.

A 2017 Pew study found that the median wealth of white households is $171,000 - 10 times that of black households ($17,100). Democratic presidential candidate Cory Booker introduced a Senate reparations bill and received support from Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders...

2013

19.02.2013. The Parliament of the state of Mississippi ratified the law on the abolition of slavery. Formally, slavery on the territory of the USA was until 2013. Thanks to kind people, they gave me the last date.

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/1412954

#BLM #afroamericans #USA #US #american #slavery #racism #european #capitalism #african #negroes #british #colonialism #anniversary #history

tord_dellsen@diasp.eu

Just when you think the zionazis can't go any lower, they find a new way to horrify the world.

I wonder when it will dawn on them that all they are doing is making absolutely certain that the resistance cannot end until the settler-colonial entity is completely dismantled and its neonazi backers in the USA, Britain and Europe are kicked out of the middle east for good ..?

--- Joti Brar, on telegram

#JotiBrar #zionism #colonialism #Palestine #genocide

donsimon@diasp.org

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/30/explorer-who-named-australia-to-be-reburied-in-lincolnshire-village-where-he-was-born
Even the Liberal newspaper par excellence repeats the colonial propaganda of discovery, despite the fact that lutriwita/ truwana had been there for 40 000 years.
event.

“But I think this whole process will bring so much more awareness of who he is, what he did and how important he was. It’s a privilege to be part of it really.”
But no awareness of the ethnic cleansing & atrocities committed , in fact Aboriginal people aren’t even mentioned.
#colonialism #genocide #Australia

wazoox@diasp.eu

NYTimes: Israeli Official Describes Secret Government Bid to Cement Control of West Bank Israeli Official Describes Secret Government Bid to Cement Control of West Bank https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/21/world/middleeast/israel-west-bank-netanyahu-bezalel-smotrich.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

Israeli judges have long ruled that Israel’s control of the territory is a temporary military occupation and complies with international law. A powerful minister’s recent speech, caught on tape, suggested the government is trying to change that.


Tags: #dandelíon #Israel #colonialism #war

via dandelion* client (Source)