#biology

waynerad@diasp.org

Lifespan of different species correlated with mutation rate of non-reproductive (somatic) cells. This research came out in 2022 but for some reason I only found out about it today. But it seems worth sharing as it seems a key insight into the nature of lifespan. Humans have 47 substitutions per year, while mice have 796 and live much shorter lives.

"To study somatic mutations across a diverse set of mammals, we isolated 208 individual intestinal crypts from 56 individuals across 16 species with a wide range of lifespans and body sizes: black-and-white colobus monkey, cat, cow, dog, ferret, giraffe, harbour porpoise, horse, human, lion, mouse, naked mole-rat, rabbit, rat, ring-tailed lemur, and tiger."

"We chose intestinal crypts for several reasons. First, they are histologically identifiable units that line the epithelium of the colon and small intestine and are amenable to laser microdissection. Second, human studies have confirmed that individual crypts become clonally derived from a single stem cell and show a linear accumulation of mutations with age, which enables the estimation of somatic mutation rates through genome sequencing of single crypts. Third, in most human crypts, most somatic mutations are caused by endogenous mutational processes common to other tissues, rather than by environmental mutagens."

"Across species, the mutational spectra showed clear similarities, with a dominance of cytosine-to-thymine (C>T) substitutions at CpG sites, as observed in human colon, but with considerable variation in the frequency of other substitution types."

"Across the 15 species with age information, we found that substitution rates per genome ranged from 47 substitutions per year in humans to 796 substitutions per year in mice, and indel rates from 2.5 to 158 indels per year, respectively."

"Indel", short for insertion/deletion, is a general term that may refer to any combination of insertions and deletions in DNA.

"To investigate the relationship between somatic mutation rates, lifespan and other life-history traits, we first estimated the lifespan of each species using survival curves. We used a large collection of mortality data from animals in zoos to minimize the effect of extrinsic mortality. We defined lifespan as the age at which 80% of individuals reaching adulthood have died, to reduce the effects of outliers and variable cohort sizes that affect maximum lifespan estimates. Notably, we found a tight anticorrelation between somatic mutation rates per year and lifespan across species. A log-log allometric regression yielded a strong linear anticorrelation between mutation rate per year and lifespan (fraction of inter-species variance explained = 0.85, P = 1 x 10^-6), with a slope close to and not significantly different from -1. This supports a simple model in which somatic mutation rates per year are inversely proportional to the lifespan of a species (rate is approximately equal to 1/lifespan), such that the number of somatic mutations per cell at the end of the lifespan (the end-of-lifespan burden) is similar in all species."

"To further study the relationship between somatic mutation rates and life-history variables, we used linear mixed-effects regression models. These models account for the hierarchical structure of the data (with multiple crypts per individual and multiple individuals per species), as well as the heteroscedasticity of somatic mutation rate estimates across species. Using these models, we estimated that the inverse of lifespan explained 82% of the inter-species variance in somatic substitution rates (rate = k/lifespan) (P = 2.9 x 10^-9), with the slope of this regression (k) representing the mean estimated end-of-lifespan burden across species (3,206.4 substitutions per genome per crypt, 95% confidence interval 2,683.9-3,728.9). Of note, despite uncertainty in the estimates of both somatic mutation rates and lifespans, and despite the diverse life histories of the species surveyed--including around 30-fold variation in lifespan and around 40,000-fold variation in body mass--the estimated mutation load per cell at the end of lifespan varied by only around threefold across species."

"Analogous results were obtained when repeating the analysis with estimates of the protein-coding mutation rate, which may be a better proxy for the functional effect of somatic mutations (85% of variance explained; end-of-lifespan burden: 31 coding substitutions per crypt)."

"Giraffe and naked mole-rat, for instance, have similar somatic mutation rates (99 and 93 substitutions per year, respectively), in line with their similar lifespans (80th percentiles: 24 and 25 years, respectively), despite a difference of around 23,000-fold in adult body mass. Similarly, cows, giraffes and horses weigh much more than an average human, and yet have somatic mutation rates that are several fold higher, in line with expectation from their lifespan but not their body mass."

Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals

#discoveries #biology #genetics #dna #gwas #lifespan #longevity

psychmesu@diaspora.glasswings.com
psychmesu@diaspora.glasswings.com
waynerad@diasp.org

"I discovered hydrothermal vents, but I'm only known for finding the Titanic."

Moral of the story: If you solve the mystery of how life got a foothold on this planet, don't also find a sufficiently famous rusty old boat.

"We were always taught that life had to live in a very narrow pH, and all of a sudden we were finding life in a very acidic environment. We realised that these clams and tube worms were actually ingesting the chemistry of the vents, using it as fuel. Their bacteria were harnessing the energy of hydrogen sulphide to fix carbon. That just blew the socks off science because we had been told that all life on Earth of any major megafauna was due to photosynthesis."

I discovered hydrothermal vents, but I’m only known for finding the Titanic

#chemistry #biology #evolution

waynerad@diasp.org

"Two lifeforms merge in once-in-a-billion-years evolutionary event."

"Last time this happened, Earth got plants."

"The phenomenon is called primary endosymbiosis, and it occurs when one microbial organism engulfs another, and starts using it like an internal organ."

The article says the first time was 2.2 billion years ago when mitochondria went from free-standing bacteria to internal organelles of archaea, eventually to become the mitochondria in animals and in us, and the second time was 1.6 billion years ago when free-standing cyanobacteria became organelles of plants called chloroplasts. This time we have a cyanobacterium called UCYN-A that can do nitrogen fixation becoming an organelle of a species of algae called B. bigelowii

What mitochondria do is take energy in the form of sugar (glucose) or ketones derived from fat and turn it into ATP (adenosine triphosphate), which is the chemical form it needs to be in to power the activity of the cell.

What chloroplasts do is photosynthesis, turning sunlight into the energy-storage molecule glucose.

What nitrogen "fixation" is all about -- strange term, I know -- it doesn't mean the nitrogen is "broken", it means the nitrogen is unavailable to biological systems before it gets "fixed" -- don't ask me why people use this term -- is converting atmospheric nitrogen (N2) to a form biological organisms can use. You see, the air we breathe is about 70% nitrogen, but these N2 molecules have a triple bond that is hard to break, so atmospheric N2 basically doesn't react with anything. You breath it in, you breathe it out, nothing happens. You get the nitrogen you need for your cells elsewhere.

And biological cells do need nitrogen. It's a key element in amino acids, the building blocks of protein. It's also part of nucleic acids -- DNA and RNA. You get yours from your food, primarily from the protein. But where does your food get it? It has to come from the atmosphere somewhere along the line. There has to be something analogous to how chloroplasts pull CO2 out of the atmosphere and use it to make glucose.

To get bioavailable nitrogen, cyanobacteria with special cells and enzymes convert atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia (NH4). (Equation below -- I'm going to skip here.) The special enzymes are an enzyme complex called the "nitrogenase complex". The special cells are called heterocysts. The reason the special cells are necessary is the nitrogenase complex enzymes don't work in the presence of oxygen. Heterocysts have extra thick cell walls to keep oxygen out.

The simple way to think of this is as an exchange of N (nitrogen) for C (carbon): The cyanobacteria provides the N and the algae provides the C. The two do an exchange as a symbiotic relationship. And apparently they've taken the next step and merged into a single organism, rather than remaining free-standing symbionts.

Now, the researchers here have not proven unequivocally that such a merger has happened -- for that they would need to prove gene migration between the two organisms. That may be done in time. For now, they have provide pretty compelling evidence: size ratios and synchronized cell division. The article talks about size ratios and that's because the sizes of the two organisms usually move in lockstep after they merge. They show a tight coupling for three sublineages of UCYN-A (called UCYN-A1, UCYN-A2, and UCYN-A3). This makes sense when you consider both want to optimize the underlying metabolic interconnection.

They've also synchronized their cell division, so they reproduce in lockstep. Another hallmark of endosymbiotic merger.

Two lifeforms merge in once-in-a-billion-years evolutionary event

#discoveries #biology #chemistry

rhysy@diaspora.glasswings.com

The phenomenon is called primary endosymbiosis, and it occurs when one microbial organism engulfs another, and starts using it like an internal organ. In exchange, the host cell provides nutrients, energy, protection and other benefits to the symbiote, until eventually it can no longer survive on its own and essentially ends up becoming an organ for the host – or what’s known as an organelle in microbial cells.

In the 4-billion-odd-year history of life on Earth, primary endosymbiosis is thought to have only happened twice that we know of, and each time was a massive breakthrough for evolution. The first occurred about 2.2 billion years ago, when an archaea swallowed a bacterium that became the mitochondria. This specialized energy-producing organelle allowed for basically all complex forms of life to evolve. It remains the heralded "powerhouse of the cell" to this day.

The second time happened about 1.6 billion years ago, when some of these more advanced cells absorbed cyanobacteria that could harvest energy from sunlight. These became organelles called chloroplasts, which gave sunlight-harvesting abilities, as well as a fetching green colour, to a group of lifeforms you might have heard of – plants.

And now, scientists have discovered that it’s happening again. A species of algae called Braarudosphaera bigelowii was found to have engulfed a cyanobacterium that lets them do something that algae, and plants in general, can’t normally do – "fixing" nitrogen straight from the air, and combining it with other elements to create more useful compounds.

Altogether, the team says this indicates UCYN-A is a full organelle, which is given the name of nitroplast. It appears that this began to evolve around 100 million years ago, which sounds like an incredibly long time but is a blink of an eye compared to mitochondria and chloroplasts.

#Science
#Biology

https://newatlas.com/biology/life-merger-evolution-symbiosis-organelle/

thefifthseason@venera.social

Wow! This is amazing. Imagine getting a visual of the bio-mechanical processes in our cell. How enzymes and molecules interact with each other. Gosh this is awesome to look at.
The channel WEHImovies that produces all these superb videos for education is: https://invidious.private.coffee/channel/UCdBrXvlJn60zgpIQcZ0Fe7w there is lots of cool films showing (and explaining/narrating) the inside of the cell and all the weird things and processes that goes on on the quantum level. Magnified x10,000,000 times gives a unique look.

I want to take a deeper look at the visualization of the energy production process in our organelle the mitochondria, step by step. This is the Cellular Respiration and metabolism process of how we make energy.

1) Glycolysis
The Glycolysis pathway process. This is the anaerobic pathway (no oxygen involved) where glucose sugar get broken down into two units of pyruvate: https://invidious.private.coffee/watch?v=1VrRl0UTlA8

2) Pyruvate Oxidation (also called Pyruvate decarboxylation)
This is an aerobic process. Here the pyruvate get converted to Acetyl-CoA by the enzyme complex pyruvate dehydrogenase complex: https://invidious.private.coffee/watch?v=EuvUOxHmX7I

3) Citric Acid Cycle (also called Krebs cycle (after Hans Adolf Krebs who identified the process) or Tricarboxylic Acid cycle)
An eight step process and central driver of cellular respiration. Here the Acetyl-CoA, fatty acids and amino acids enter the cycle and goes through a series of chemical reactions that create 2 units of ATP (Adenosine Triphosphorate), CO2, NADH and FADH2 (both are coenzymes). Carbon dioxide is produced as a byproduct which we need to expel through breathing (the main reason why we breath, to expel CO2, we usually have ample of oxygen in us): https://invidious.private.coffee/watch?v=aV-kI_ep1Rk

4) Electron Transport Chain
During the electron transport chain high-energy electrons are transferred from molecules such as NADH and FADH2 to oxygen, with the energy released being used to pump protons across the inner mitochondrial membrane. This creates a proton gradient, which drives the synthesis of 34-38 units of ATP by the enzyme ATP synthase. Fun fact, that little nano motor unit (ATP Synthase) spins around at about 7800rpm: https://invidious.private.coffee/watch?v=nmoLoiFakxY

5) Oxidative Phosphorylation
During oxidative phosphorylation, ATP is produced as a result of the transfer of electrons through the electron transport chain. One key difference between oxidative phosphorylation and the electron transport chain is that oxidative phosphorylation specifically refers to the production of ATP through the coupling of electron transport and ATP synthesis. This process involves the combination of electrons, protons and oxygen molecule that produce water as a byproduct.
Synthesis of ATP: https://invidious.private.coffee/watch?v=OT5AXGS1aL8

#Molecular #Animation #Biology #Cell #Mitochondria #Energy #Science #Education #ATP #OxidativePhosphorylation #CitricAcidCycle #Glycolysis #ElectronTransportChain #PyruvateOxidation

nowisthetime@pod.automat.click

From A.I. really meaning #Alien Intelligence to the primary reason for the #Iraq invasion being because Sadam had found the remains of #Nimrod (of tower of Babel fame ) and a hoard of #artefacts buried with him.

The Cosmic Salon - A chat with Dr. Alphonzo Monzo III, ND LMT, LPNM
https://podbay.fm/p/the-cosmic-salon/e/1712779919
2 hour 5 minutes - Posted Apr 10, 2024

SHOW NOTES
Here is another riveting chat for y'all to enjoy. We get into so much, including woo, and still there is such an incredible amount to cover that I've asked Meredith to invite #Dr. #Monzo back on. #Quantum Dots. #Carbon C-60. #Nephilim. #Healing modalities. #Parasites. Weaponized #biology. #Slime #mould,

and so much more.

Dr. Monzo's website:

https://www.well-beingbydesign.com/