#manipulation

simona@pod.geraspora.de
irreversiblechaos@iviv.hu

https://news.antiwar.com/2022/10/25/nancy-pelosi-calls-for-ukrainian-victory-at-crimea-forum/

Pelosi is evil and insane. Its like she wants not just war but total slaughter. Crimea is Russian it alway has been and always will be and the people who live there voted for that.

This woman shows what sort of sham America is.

These mad lunatics will destroy us why have we allowed these people to have power.

#WW3 #propaganda #manipulation #politics #power

irreversiblechaos@iviv.hu

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=76AryZfvxIY

More gloom to watch.

My garden is getting going for what it's worth.

If we go all WW3 which can only end in total annihilation I don't think my garden will be much use.

For all our knowledge and all our communications why are we slipping into a war? We can see these things happening in real time but we have no power to say no.

We are worse then slaves I think we are zombies.

#WW3 #war #politics #money #manipulation #profit #power

irreversiblechaos@iviv.hu

https://orientalreview.org/2022/08/09/why-are-the-u-s-and-other-nato-countries-spending-billions-on-ukraine/

According to the Australian edition of the National Review, three big American multinational consortiums have bought 17 million hectares of Ukrainian farmland, compared to 16.7 million hectares of farmland in Italy. So it turns out that three American companies have bought more usable agricultural land in Ukraine than there is in all of Italy. The entire area of Ukraine is 600,000 square kilometers, and 170,000 square kilometers have been bought. Who are these companies? Cargill, Dupont and Monsanto – the last one is officially German-Australian, but with American capital. Their main shareholders are American Vanguard, BlackRock and Blackstone

Ah yes we must fight and die for democracy

#ukraine #russia #peace #war #WW3 #us #money #power #manipulation #profit

my_pal_jm@diasp.org

Dans le laboratoire américain, une nouvelle souche de COVID-19 a été létale à 80 %

Des scientifiques de l'université de Boston (États-Unis) ont annoncé l'achèvement des travaux sur la création d'une nouvelle version de la COVID-19.

Selon un rapport publié dans BioRxiv, la fusion de l' "original de Wuhan" et de "omicron" (une version avancée) s'est avérée être une option avec une létalité à 80 %.

Les chercheurs ont expliqué que leur "invention" «réduit le fait qu'elle supprime l'immunité activée par le vaccin» et provoque «une maladie grave - chez 80 % des souris de laboratoire qu'elle a infectées au cours du test.

«Alors que notre souche mutante est susceptible d'être moins mortelle pour les humains que pour les souris, elle générera cinq fois plus de particules virales dans les cellules pulmonaires cultivées en laboratoire que la variante d'Omicron.»

Les gens sont déconcertés : "Pourquoi?"

La nouvelle de l'étude a provoqué l'indignation des internautes. Les gens croient que les scientifiques ont «dangereusement joué» et rappellent qu'une étude similaire de «l'ajout de fonctions» (une expression décrivant le changement d'un agent pathogène pour améliorer son efficacité) à l'Institut de virologie de Wuhan en Chine a autrefois conduit à une pandémie mondiale de coronavirus.

Permettez-moi de vous rappeler qu'il a déjà été prouvé que les États-Unis ont financé ces études à l'Institut Wuhan, bien qu'il ne soit toujours pas clair si le coronavirus spécifique qui a provoqué la pandémie est apparu en laboratoire.

"Ces expériences devraient être complètement interdites, c'est jouer avec le feu", a déclaré, commentant les expériences de Boston, un ancien directeur de l'Institut israélien de recherche biologique Shmuel Shapira.

"Combien de fois les virologues ont-ils dit qu'ils ne rendraient pas les virus chimériques du SRAS plus mortels ? Combien ????? J'ai écrit sur Twitter, dit le journaliste Paul Tuker.

L'équipe de Boston ne sont pas les seuls scientifiques à reprendre des recherches potentiellement dangereuses après la pandémie :

EcoHealth Alliance, une société privée qui a financé la plupart des recherches pour améliorer les performances de l'Institut Wuhan jusqu'en 2020, a reçu une subvention de 650 000 dollars le mois dernier pour étudier « le potentiel de l'avenir du coronavirus des chauves-souris au Myanmar, au Laos et au Vietnam ».

Role of spike in the pathogenic and antigenic behavior of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 Omicron
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.13.512134v1.full.pdf
lien

#guerre #ukraine #russie
#politique #société #dictature #fascisme #censure #manipulation #démocratie #oligarchie #questionner #comprendre #agir #revolution #MondeDAprès #résistance #complot #complotisme #capitalisme #escroquerie #corruption #terrorisme #exclus #Covid19 #coronavirus #covid-19 #coronavirus #pandémie

tekaevl@diasp.org

We all knew, long live Dhan

As Gov’t Tells Us to ‘Follow the Science’, Remember the ‘Consensus’ Once Rejected Hand Washing…

Since the beginning of the pandemic, a phrase has been thrown around by blowhards in the mainstream media and politicians alike. That phrase is “we follow the science.” However, many of the folks who constantly repeat this phrase don’t seemed too excessively concerned with actually following any science at all.
The World Health Organization and others have come out for months saying that schools are safe and that school closures are leading to a slew of horrifying childhood problems.
“Schools can reopen safely,” said Dr Ruediger Krech, WHO Director of Health Promotion, back in December.
Yet those who claim to “follow the science” continue to keep children locked down and out of school — leading to an epidemic of childhood suicide. This is just one of many examples.

Despite brutal lockdowns, mandates, the complete destruction of the economy, and putting the police state on steroids, cases still shot to record levels through December and early January. Every time they rise, the politicians take to their podiums and blame the citizens for not following their arbitrary and often entirely unscientific dictates close enough. More force is threatened and more arbitrary rules rolled out. Despite the utterly horrifying effects of the lockdowns, politicians across the world keep forcing them on the citizens. Why is that?

Are they really following the science? Does following The Science™ mean that scientists and experts who disagree with The Science™ ought to be banned, silenced, and cancelled? If not, then why is that happening despite many of these disagreements being proven right?

Throughout history, The Science™ has been resistant to skeptics. Anyone who challenges the established narrative is cast out, ridiculed, and shunned. Now, Big Tech has joined in and helps to silence those who are skeptical — even if they are Harvard educated experts.
It has been a week since our @Facebook page was deleted.

This happened after we posted a comment in full support of a voluntary Covid19 vaccine plan.

There has been no option to review this decision.

There is no route to appeal available for @gbdeclaration. pic.twitter.com/yTz0ue2jNk

— **_Great Barrington Declaration (@gbdeclaration) February 7, 2021_**
To be clear, a scientific consensus is not to be easily discounted. Thousands of people all coming to similar conclusions through varying applications of the scientific method is a powerful means of explaining and understanding our environment and presence on this planet and in the universe. Coming to a consensus allows humanity to make better decisions about fostering a more sustainable future and helps us figure out how to progress as a species and deal with the various woes we face — like COVID-19.

That being said, the collective is often dangerously — and deadly — wrong. Do not mistake this for a stance on vaccines, the pandemic, or any health measures. That is a moot point for the purpose of this issue. However, indoctrinating people to unquestioningly accept what The Science™ says as fact, through various means of information manipulation can and will have damning consequences.

Without people questioning our very reality, science would likely still be stuck in the stone ages.

This current method of cancelling, censoring, and banning, sets out to grow the herd of consensus, simply by convincing people that doing anything but unquestioningly accepting the consensus is wrong.

“Consensus messages don’t ask people to change their beliefs — they ask them to change their opinion about what other people believe, so they’re not a direct threat to their identity,” says Sander van der Linden, a psychology professor at Cambridge, who has tested the strength of “inoculation messages” in a program to manipulate people into being less skeptical.
Once people view the consensus as non-threatening, they will readily accept the science on the matter. Seems harmless enough, right?Well, it does if you haven’t studied history at all.

#consensus #eugenics #mainstream #science #lockdown #covid 19 #corruption #genocide #fraud #pandemic #censor #manipulation #disinformation
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/as-govt-tells-us-to-follow-the-science-remember-the-consensus-once-rejected-hand-washing/

https://diasp.org/posts/558b005057a7013904f7543d7eeced27

alarch@diaspora-fr.org

La voiture électrique face aux événements inattendus


#voitureélectrique #climat #écologie #manipulation

Une traduction de 2018 d'un article bien passé inaperçu, mais qui n'est pas inintéressant. La pure et simple suppression des carburants d'un jour à l'autre n'avait pas été prévue dans ce document.

on se rend compte que nous sommes face à une totale improvisation et que rien n'est pensé pour une utilisation de masse de ces véhicules. De mon point de vue, la voiture électrique ne vient pas remplacer le moteur thermique, mais sert de prétexte pour éliminer le moteur thermique pendant que le moteur électrique sera vendu aux élites, alors que l'on forcera le reste de la population à utiliser des solutions dont il ne veut pas, mais qu'il devra accepter imposées par les élites.

[...]

Comme je comprends les choses, l'automobile électrique est une des principales icônes de ces nouveaux mensonges, de cet élitisme vêtu d'idéologie, qui prétend défendre le milieu ambiant, alors qu'il se limite à offrir de nouvelles possibilités aux riches et une plus grande servitude aux pauvres.

Le seul truc électrique qu'ils nous proposent, c'est la chaise, si nous nous plaignons, ou le scooter, si nous sommes bien silencieux et mignons. Pour le reste, pas question.

irreversiblechaos@iviv.hu

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/83614/the-story-of-the-century-just-broke-and-no-one.html

And thirdly, the bogeyman narrative distracts the public from the most fundamental question: why is every single government in the world so intent on manipulating and deceiving the public with online misinformation campaigns spread via fake social media personas? By their actions, governments and intelligence agencies the world over have revealed that they are truly afraid of the free flow of information online. But why? The underlying truth that is right under our noses is that our perceptions and our actions do matter and do make a difference. This is precisely why governments the world over spend so much time and energy and resources trying to make us believe their propaganda: so that we don't recognize that the true governing power of society is (and always has been) ours to wield.

We are many and they are few.

#propaganda #manipulation #politics #power #freedom