#drm

diane_a@diasp.org

" the Brother laser printer everyone else has. It’s cheap, reliable, and the toner lasts a long time. Get a Brother laser printer, he said, and basically never think about your printer again. You know what part of Nilay’s post sounded really nice? This part right here:

It has been connected to our Wi-Fi for like six years straight, and I have never replaced the toner. It prints Amazon return labels from my phone without complaining, and it does not feel like the CEO of Inkjet Supply and Hostage Situations Incorporated is waiting to mug me or enable #DRM at the slightest provocation.

I, on the other hand, spent a couple dozen hours between September 2021 and February 2022 trying to defeat the region lock on my #HP printer so I could go back to not thinking about it."

https://www.theverge.com/23648726/hp-officejet-printer-region-how-to-change-why

#USA

danie10@squeet.me

Betamax vs VHS Again? Digital Radio Has A Number Of Broadcasting Standards Globally

Woman sitting on the sand with a radio, and tuning the knob
Until today, I’d mainly been hearing about DAB as a digital radio standard to replace AM and FM analogue broadcasting. Then today I heard about DRM (thinking it was ham radio DMR Motorola standard), and realised there is more than just DAB out there.

Without going into the technicalities (as I’m still picking up on all this and our own country was still to make a decision between DAB+ and DRM), DAB is chiefly adopted by the UK, DRM is very European-centric, HD Radio is North America, and China Digital Radio is of course Chinese.

The older standards are better established and more ‘popular’ as far as adoption goes. So, as with VHS and Betamax, or PAL and NTSC, it does not mean the most used is always the ‘best’ one technically. It is a matter of which country adopts what according to their own criteria.

The important thing though is that digital requires less electrical power, less radio spectrum, and can carry more programming stations than older analogue like AM and FM. We saw the same with amateur radio, actually, with digital modes like JS8Call digital mode punching through the static way further than an analogue signal.

So digital is clearly the future of radio. For example, the DAB+ standard would allow 18 different programming stations to exist off a single transmitter, using around 75% less electrical energy to cover the equivalent footprint that 18 FM analogues stations would have provided. So from an aggregated signal distribution perspective, this is way better. Again we saw the same with ham radio, where more than one station could use the same digital frequency, requiring only one repeater frequency.

So as a listener, your choice is really easy. For whatever country you are in, you have to use that standard (for local radio, anyway). As I understand it, HD Radio is a proprietary standard, whilst DAB+ and DRM+ are open standards, but technically there is no reason why a digital radio could otherwise not support more than one of these standards on the same radio receiver (much like many older radios support both AM and FM standards).

So if you do import a radio, be sure to check that it supports your country’s standard. Also be aware, older standards such as DAB are not forward compatible with newer DAB+, so unlike analogue, you may have to ditch your receiver if the standard upgrades in future (unless they can receive software patches).

Unlike VHS and Betamax though, one of these standards will not likely rule worldwide, and it will be more a case of PAL/NTSC or Metric/Imperial standards just exiting together.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_radio
#Blog, #DAB, #digitalradio, #DRM, #HDRadio, #technology

fefebot@pod.dapor.net

[l] Ich krieg ja in letzter Zeit immer Kopfweh davon, wie offensichtlich bescheuert die Leute sind. Wenn das wenigstens Irrtümer auf einem Niveau wären, wo man irgendwas argumentieren kann. Aber nein!

Mein aktueller Endboss in Sachen offensichtlich bescheuerter IT-Homöopathie ist Cloud-Verschlüsselung.

OK, kurzes Gedankenspiel. Ihr fahrt in den Urlaub und bittet den Nachbarn, eure Pflanzen zu wässern. Dafür gebt ihr ihm den Schlüssel.

Euch ist hoffentlich direkt sofort klar, und zwar ohne dass ich das irgendwie erläutern muss, dass der Nachbar ab dann in eure Wohnung kommen und Dinge tun kann. Schlüssel zurückholen hilft nicht, denn er kann einen Nachschlüssel angefertigt haben.

Wenn du einmal den Schlüssel weggibst, hilft nur Schlosstausch.

Aber was machen die Cloud-Leute jetzt? Die haben ja das Problem, dass deine Software auf ihrer Hardware läuft, und Software kann sich gegen Angreifer mit physischem Zugriff auf die Hardware nicht schützen. Prinzipiell nicht. Nicht "wir wissen nicht wie". Doch. Wir wissen. Geht nicht.

Software ist eine Liste von Dingen. Die gibt man der Hardware, und die führt die dann aus. Wenn jemand anderes die Hardware kontrolliert, kontrolliert er deine Software.

Da führt auch kein Weg dran vorbei. Daher wird DRM immer wieder geknackt, und deshalb führen Intel und ARM einen Krieg gegen ihre Kunden und nehmen ihnen schrittweise immer mehr der Kontrolle über die Hardware weg.

Was machen also die Cloud-Leute? Sie verdünnen Wasser! Hey, wir haben hier einen Knopf hingemacht. "Verschlüsselung aktivieren". Das ist ungefähr wie am Set von Star Trek der Knopf "Schilde aktivieren". Das tut nichts und jeder weiß es. Da ist kein Schild. Wir tun nur alle so.

Während wir bei Star Trek wenigstens unterhalten werden, ist das bei der Cloud einfach nur Beschiss. Wenn die Cloud verschlüsselt, dann hat die Cloud den Schlüssel. Mit dem kann man Ver- und Entschlüsseln. Solange der Cloud-Anbieter den Schlüssel jemals irgendwann auch nur kurz gesehen hat, ist das kein Schutz gegen den Cloud-Anbieter, und als genau das wird das ja gerade verkauft.

OK Fefe, das hilft dann vielleicht nicht gegen den bösen Admin beim Cloud-Anbieter, aber es hilft doch gegen den chinesischen Hacker, der die Cloud hackt? Nein, tut es nicht, denn die Cloud entschlüsselt das ja für dich. Wenn der sich als du einloggen kann, oder dir eine SQL Injection oder sonst was unterschieben kann, dann hat der vollen Zugang, genau wie ohne Verschlüsselung.

OK, aber hilft das denn wenigstens gegen die Putzhilfe vom iranischen Geheimdienst, die das Tape mit dem Backup klaut? Ja, wenn der Schlüssel nicht auf dem Tape ist, was erschütternd häufig der Fall ist. Aber wir reden hier nicht von Tapes sondern von S3-Buckets gerade. Die hängen am Web. Wieso würde jemand alte Backups haben wollen, wenn er Echtzeitzugriff kriegen kann?

Lustigerweise gibt es wie bei Homöopathie mehrere Verdünnungsstandards. Einige Cloud-Anbieter haben bloß eine Checkbox "Verschlüsselung anschalten". Der Schlüssel kommt von denen und bleibt bei denen.

Andere Anbieter lassen dich den Schlüssel erzeugen und hochladen. Spielt keine Rolle, denn sie müssen den ja nur einmal für eine Nanosekunde gesehen haben.

Noch andere Anbieter lassen dich einen "Vault" installieren (lacht nicht, ist ein echter Produktname), und dann holt sich die Cloud immer von dem Vault den Schlüssel, wenn sie ihn braucht. Impliziert, dass sie den nicht aufheben, aber das weißt du halt nicht. Ist alles dieselbe Scheiße.

Das ist alles Bauernfängerei. Fallt da nicht drauf rein.

Faustregel: Wenn dein Code auf jemand anderes Hardware laufen lässt, oder deine Daten auf jemand anderes Hardware liegen, ist es nicht mehr dein Code, sind es nicht mehr deine Daten.

#fefebot #drm

fefebot@pod.dapor.net

[l] John Deere erlaubt jetzt plötzlich "freiwillig" bislang unautorisierte Reparaturen an ihrem Gerät. Das ist ein seit Jahren schwelender Streit, denn John Deere ist einer der größten Hersteller von Agrar-Hardware und die sind da full DRM retard gegangen.Das ging soweit, dass es einen Schwarzmarkt für eine versehentlich ohne DRM an die Ukraine ausgelieferte Firmware gab, die die Bauern dann schwarz auf ihre Mähdrescher aufgespielt haben.Es gab in letzter Zeit einige Fortschritte im "Right to Repair", insofern vermute ich mal, dass sie ein deutlich unvorteilhafteres Gerichtsurteil vermeiden wollten.Und gegen Gesetzesvorhaben können sie jetzt argumentieren, die seien ja nicht mehr nötig, weil man ja freiwillig eingelenkt habe.Auch Apple hat schon eingelenkt und den Kunden Eigenreparaturen erlaubt, was aber eher ein Feigenblatt ist, denn man kann da z.B. kein Display-Panel fürs Handy einzeln kaufen (billig) sondern nur als Kombination mit der Elektronik. Elektronik-Profis, die in der Lage gewesen wären, das Display einzeln zu tauschen, können das jetzt halt immer noch nicht tun, was den Preis für Ersatzteile mal eben verdreifacht oder so.

Die nächste Frage ist, ob das John-Deere-Ding nur in den USA gilt oder auch sonst.

#fefebot #drm #apple

prplcdclnw@diasp.eu

When did Apple start to become evil?

Earlier than I thought.

Thanks to Cory for cluing me in.

https://archive.org/details/AppleSSAFEProject

From "Vadermeer":\
\
Yesterday at the Seattle Goodwill Outlet, where everything is sold by the pound, I noticed the Apple logo on letterhead sticking out from a bin of books, so I started digging. What I found were the 1979-1980 files of Jack MacDonald, manager of system software for the Apple II and /// at the time. They tell the story of project "SSAFE" or "Software Security from Apples Friends and Enemies." This was a proposal to bring disk copy protection in-house to sell as a service to outside developers. Inter-office memos, meeting notes and progress reports all give a good idea of what a project lifecycle was like. Different schemes and levels of protection are considered, as well as implementation primarily on the Apple II+ and the upcoming SARA (The Apple ///) and Lisa computers. Randy Wigginton is featured prominently throughout, along with mentions of Woz and many other familiar names.\
\
The documents were all a jumble so I've put them in chronological order and scanned the collection, please enjoy.

Here's a direct link to the PDF. https://archive.org/download/AppleSSAFEProject/Apple%20SSAFE%20Project.pdf

Randy Wigginton was a name I was not familiar with.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Wigginton

This article doesn't mention Wigginton's role in pushing DRM. That's what the PDF is all about. My Apple //e was the freest, most open computer I have ever owned, but while I was enjoying that, the powerful at Apple were already scheming to take all that away.

The Wigginton article connected to Michael Scott. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Scott_(Apple)

On February 25, 1981, the day known as "Black Wednesday" at the company, Scott personally fired forty Apple employees, including half of the Apple II team, in a belief that they were redundant. Later in the afternoon he assembled the remaining employees with a keg of beer and explained the firings by stating, "I used to say that when being CEO at Apple wasn't fun anymore, I'd quit. But now I've changed my mind — when it isn't fun any more, I'll fire people until it's fun again."\
\
Following this abrupt event, he was moved to vice chairman, a title with little power, and Mike Markkula, the man who had hired Scott, replaced him.\
\
Scott left Apple officially on July 10, 1981, stating in his resignation letter:

So I am having a new learning experience, something I've never done before. I quit, not resign to join a new company or retire for personal reasons ... This is not done for those who fear my opinions and style, but for the loyal ones who may be given false hope.\
Yours. Michael, Private Citizen

See also https://appleinsider.com/articles/17/02/23/documents-unearthed-from-early-apple-history-show-shift-in-company-focus-from-hobbyist-to-businesses

A series of documents discovered at a thrift store in Seattle examines Apple's mindset in the late '70s and early '80s as it shifted from a hobbyist company to one interested in gathering, and retaining business clients for its Apple II series of computers.

#drm #defective-by-design #freedom #computer #computers #copy-protection #free-software #software-freedom

prplcdclnw@diasp.eu

Why None of my Books Are Available on Audible:

And Why Amazon Owes Me $3,218.55

by Cory Doctorow

So now there is one Cory Doctorow audio book on Audible, and it's all about how Audible screws over writers, publishers, audio book narrators, and customers.

You can read the text here. https://pluralistic.net/2022/07/25/can-you-hear-me-now/

You can listen to Cory read it here. https://archive.org/download/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_431/Cory_Doctorow_Podcast_431_-_Why_none_of_my_books_are_available_on_Audible.mp3 It starts at 4:26. This is the latest episode of the Cory Doctorow podcast, so there is other stuff too.

It is now available as an ebook for Kindle for $0.98 (presumably with DRM) on Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B5RWTPR7/

And, finally, the audio of Cory reading it is now available on Audible (definitely with DRM). https://www.audible.com/pd/B0B7KH8KSD

In 2011, I gave a speech at Berlin's Chaos Communications Congress called "The Coming War on General Purpose Computing." In it, I explained that Digital Rights Management was technologically incoherent, a bizarre fantasy in which untrusted users of computers could be given encrypted files and all the tools needed to decrypt them, but somehow be prevented from using those decrypted files in ways that conflicted with the preferences of the company that supplied those files:\
\
https://memex.craphound.com/2012/01/10/lockdown-the-coming-war-on-general-purpose-computing/\
\
As I said then, computers are stubbornly, inescapably "general purpose." The only computer we know how to make – the Turing-complete von Neumann machine – is the computer that can run all the programs we know how to write. When someone claims to have built a computer-powered "appliance" – say, a smart speaker or (God help us all) a smart toaster – that can only run certain programs, what they mean is that they've designed a computer that can run every program, but which will refuse to run programs unless the manufacturer approves them.

BTW, here's the RSS feed for the Cory Doctorow podcast. https://feeds.feedburner.com/doctorow_podcast

#cory #cory-doctorow #amazon #audible #kindle #copyright #drm #law #dmca #1201 #creators #narrators #audio-book-narrators #podcast

anonymiss@despora.de

#Sony’s #PlayStation Store Pulling Access to Purchased Studiocanal #Movies Next Month

source: https://variety.com/2022/digital/news/playstation-store-pulling-access-to-purchased-studiocanal-movies-next-month-1235310863/

“As of August 31, 2022, due to our evolving licensing agreements with content providers, you will no longer be able to view your previously purchased Studio Canal content and it will be removed from your #video library,” the notices read. “We greatly appreciate your continued support.” The PlayStation Store’s removal of the films was previously reported by German website 4KFilme.

And where do I get my #money back for buying the movies you Scammers?

#copyright #DRM #fail #customer #service #digital #economy #news #entertainment #movie

fefebot@pod.tchncs.de

[l] Habt ihr das auch gelesen? Die Russen haben in der Ukraine Traktoren gestohlen und nach Tschetschenien gekarrt, um dann dort festzustellen, dass der Hersteller die aus der Ferne deaktiviert hat?

Haha! Super luschtig! Bis euch auffällt, dass der Hersteller das Feature nicht für den Ukrainekrieg programiert haben wird, sondern gegen reguläre Bauern. Das ist DRM. Wenn die das mit den Russen machen können, können sie das auch mit euch machen. Da ist nichts lustig dran. Das ist eine fucking Dystopie!

Cory Doctorow hat den Finger in der Wunde.

Money Quote 1:

Why are John Deere tractors kill-switched in the first place?

Here’s a hint: the technology was not invented to thwart Russian looters.

No, it was invented to thwart American farmers.

Mir ist ja absolut unklar, wieso irgendjemand irgendwo auf der Welt irgendwas von dieser Firma kaufen würde. Das ist nun seit langer Zeit bekannt, wie die ticken. Als die einmal versehentlich eine Debug-Firmware geliefert haben — ironischerweise in die Ukraine! —, hat sich ein weltweiter Schwarzmarkt für Kopien dieser Firmware gebildet. Wie viele rote Warnlampen brauchen die Farmer, bevor sie bei einer solchen Firma nicht mehr kaufen?!

Aber Cory Doctorow geht weiter. Wieso haben die überhaupt einen Netzwerk-Zugang, fragt er? Er gibt auch gleich die Antwort: Weil die die Bauern totalüberwachen und die Daten abschnorcheln und das ist die eigentliche Cash Cow bei denen. Money Quote 2:

In the 2017 edition of these exemption hearings, John Deere filed a stunning brief with the Copyright Office: in it, they explained that farmers do not own the tractors they spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on.

In fact, the farmers can’t own these tractors, because the software that animates these tractors (and enforces VIN locks and restrictions on using your own data) belongs to John Deere for the full term of copyright — 90 years — and the farmers merely license that code, and they are bound by the terms of service they have to click “OK” on every time they switch on their ignitions.

Those terms specify that even if a farmer repairs their own tractor, swapping a broken part for a working one, they must pay hundreds of dollars and wait for days for an authorized Deere technician to come out to the end of their lonely country road to key in an unlock code.

This is the system that let the Ukrainian Deere dealership brick those tractors between Melitopol and Chechnya.

So sieht das nämlich aus.

Willkommen in der Dystopie.

#fefebot #drm

anonymiss@despora.de

Russians plunder $5M #farm vehicles from #Ukraine -- to find they've been remotely disabled

source: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/01/europe/russia-farm-vehicles-ukraine-disabled-melitopol-intl/index.html

Some of the machinery was taken to a nearby village, but some of it embarked on a long overland journey to #Chechnya more than 700 miles away. The sophistication of the #machinery, which are equipped with #GPS, meant that its travel could be tracked. It was last tracked to the village of Zakhan Yurt in Chechnya.

The equipment ferried to Chechnya, which included combine harvesters -- can also be controlled remotely. "When the invaders drove the stolen harvesters to Chechnya, they realized that they could not even turn them on, because the harvesters were locked remotely," the contact said.

The #equipment now appears to be languishing at a farm near Grozny. But the contact said that "it seems that the hijackers have found consultants in Russia who are trying to bypass the #protection."

You may think that in this case it hits the right ones, but think about the following scenario: the world is facing a #starvation catastrophe and is in urgent need of tractors for #food production. But the farmer can't pay his debts at the moment. Then the tractors are deactivated regardless of whether people starve to death. Damn #DRM and damn #capitalism - why do people buy such #bullshit #technology?

#news #software #fail #military #crime #agriculture #problem #war #Russia