#epidemic

theaitetos@diaspora.psyco.fr

The Fake Science of Sugar

How #fat and #cholesterol were substituted for sugar and turned #Americans into an #unhealthy #herd of waddling #land-whales.

A doctor explains how the groundwork for the #FoodPyramid #nonsense and the encouragement to reduce #fat consumption and increase #carbohydrate #consumption of the 1990s was laid by the #corruption of #scientistry in the 1960s.

In 1967, a single scientific study revealed the true #culprit of the #diabetes and #heart-disease #epidemic was #sugar. NOT saturated fat or cholesterol. So why wasn’t this information made common knowledge? They covered it all up. The sugar industry knew the results of these studies would tank sales and cost them billions. So the #SugarResearchFoundation paid three #Harvard #scientists $65,000 each to “prove” sugar was harmless. The scientists were some of the most respected nutrition experts in the world. Dr. #FrederickStare was the chairman of Harvard’s Department of Nutrition. Dr. #MarkHegsted was a scientific advisor for the USDA. Dr. #RobertGandy was a pioneer in dietary research.

The scientists dismissed multiple long-term studies. The first study proved sugar caused deadly #arterial #plaques. This was ignored. Another showed heart disease skyrocketed on a #high-carb #diet. The scientists dismissed it, claiming “these diets are rarely consumed.” The consequences of this scientific manipulation are horrifying. The truth about sugar and its effects on obesity, diabetes, and heart disease remained in the dark for years. Well-meaning doctors prescribed their patients #low-fat, high-carb diets for decades. These #dietary suggestions are to blame for the #obesity #crisis in America.

The #USDA urged Americans to trade #butter for #margarine. Margarine is now accepted as an artery-clogging #poison. And another massive shift was to “healthy” low-fat foods loaded with hidden sugars. As a result, U.S sugar consumption tripled. So did #BigSugar profits. And not surprisingly, so did type 2 diabetes and blood sugar issues. In 1980, only 1 in 50 Americans had a blood sugar problem. Today, that number is up to 1 in 3. High blood sugar kills roughly 3.2 million people per year.

In other words, as with #immigration and #third-world #overpopulation, the seeds of the castastrophic crises we are experiencing across the West were planted in a very small period of time between 1960 and 1967.

During the mid-20th century, Borlaug led the introduction of these high-yielding varieties combined with modern agricultural production techniques to Mexico, Pakistan, and India. As a result, Mexico became a net exporter of wheat by 1963. Between 1965 and 1970, wheat yields nearly doubled in Pakistan and India, greatly improving the food security in those nations. These collective increases in yield have been labeled the Green Revolution, and Borlaug is often credited with saving over a billion people worldwide from starvation. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 in recognition of his contributions to world peace through increasing food supply.

Add the names of Frederick Stare, Mark Hegsted, and Robert Gandy to the infamous list that includes #NormanBorlaug, #PhilipHart, and #EmmanuelCellar of men whose objectives and actions contributed the most to the downfall of the West and its transformation into #ClownWorld.

shuttersparks@diaspora.glasswings.com

For many years I've participated in the Outbreaks Near Me program (formerly Flu Near Me), sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital. I think it's a good program. It allows you to self-report your health status at regular intervals. Many cases of Covid, including mine a year ago, and flu would otherwise go unreported. You might consider using it to help contribute more data and to see statistics in your area.

https://www.outbreaksnearme.org

#covid #flu #health #medicine #epidemic #pandemic #statistics

gander22h@diasp.org

Only a few weeks into this flu season, 11 deaths have already been reported among children and teens across Canada

Some experts say providing timely information about the severity of a communicable disease like the flu can help people protect themselves and in this case, their kids.

“…that kind of information can help inform the public and can be useful to encourage people to seek and listen to public health advice,” [Dr. Rod Lim, head of pediatric emergency at the London, Ont., Health Sciences Centre] said.

B.C.'s revelation of its pediatric flu deaths provides a concrete example of how this can work: it triggered a surge in parents bringing their kids to get vaccinated against the flu.

#Canada #CBC #news #flu #influenza #epidemic #pandemic #vaccine #vaccination

gander22h@diasp.org

Local child dies from flu amid severe influenza season

PHAC declared the start of an influenza epidemic last week

A child in eastern Ontario who tested positive for the flu has died, the Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit confirmed Sunday.

The health unit did not share any details about the child who died, including their age and whether they had any pre-existing conditions.

The flu vaccine is one of the most effective ways to reduce health risk, [Dr. Linna Li, the unit's acting medical officer of health] said, adding everyone over six months of age is strongly recommended to get the shot.

#flu #influenza #epidemic #news #cbc

psych@diasp.org

OK.... "What's wrong with this picture?"
Just another day.... No gun epidemic or societal meltdown happening here folks, nothing to see, move along...

Individual Open Carrying AR-15 Gets Robbed at Gunpoint in St. Louis

Another pandemic turned endemic, sadly. So if everybody in America carries assault weapons, it's all good, eh?

It's not a pretty picture of events and responses, in the past 20+ years. Children bear the brunt of it, for lifetimes & generations.

My reference (begun 9/11, through Columbine and several other school massacres): Children and Violence

#guns #epidemic #violence #crime #assaultweapons #AR15 #society #sociology #psychology

diggers@diaspora-fr.org

A very interesting philosophical look at the current social crisis.

When a #Virus Mutates with #Ideology: Fear-Mongering for the ‘Wellbeing of the Neighbour’ by Alex Janda

Source: The philosophical salon

But lessons learnt from #Germany offer an alternative reading: the outburst of utilitarian morals leads to an unethical impasse ignoring radical #freedom.

Germany is predestined to exemplify the gradual division of an entire #society, of how a ‘politics of fear’ combined with a media strategy of ‘fear induction’ govern political decision-making, and how security understood as the elimination of any ‘virological health risk’ becomes the fulcrum point of the current political strategy to fight a pathogen.

They warn and warn – and people then love them for the fact that their evil forecasts never come true because measures were taken to prevent them. Not only does the prevention paradox lie dormant here, but also a cover-up of our factual unknowing of the future. The exact waves of the virus are not predictable, period. If they were, we would not be able to defend ourselves.

The real scandal is that Germany faces an incredible mismanagement of #Covid-19 based on trickery only to keep the neoliberal system it is built upon.

“Our interest is most particularly engaged by the mental state of expectation, which puts in motion a number of mental forces that have the greatest influence on the onset and cure of physical diseases. Fearful expectation is certainly not without its effect on the result. It would be of importance to know with certainty whether it has as great a bearing as is supposed on falling ill; for instance, whether it is true that during an #epidemic those who are afraid of contracting the illness are in the greatest danger. The contrary state of mind, in which expectation is coloured by hope and faith, is an effective force with which we have to reckon, strictly speaking, in all our attempts at treatment and cure. We could not otherwise account for the peculiar results which we find produced by medicaments and therapeutic procedures."

#Biology as an abstract quantifying #science departs from ‘the work of spirit’ any singular cure relies upon ‘in reality’. Each death or survival is a unique constellation involving unknowns. There is no biometric solution ‘for all’.

The political dimension is clear: if expectations are part of the cure, then is an intentionally induced ‘politics of fear’ based on ideological manipulations not deeply unethical in times of fast-propagating virus? Such political manoeuvres are problematic, as they are justified in the name of the ‘wellbeing of the #neighbour’. This imaginary figure of the neighbour can be read in line with Jacques Lacan’s Ego-Ideal: the proclaimed ‘solidarity’ with an anonymous ‘neighbour’, a non-existent ‘jedermann’, who is shifted to the centre of our #responsibility, only serves as a moralistic pretence to care about one’s own survival.

"First of all, let’s get rid of this average Joe, who does not exist. He is a statistical fiction. There are individuals, and that is all. When I hear people talking about the person on the street, studies of public opinion, mass phenomena, and so on, I think of all the patients that I’ve seen on the couch in forty years of listening. None of them in any measure resembled the others. None of them had the same phobias and anxieties, the same way of talking, the same fear of not understanding.”

Official narratives justifying the current political strategy are supported by such a fundamental phantasy about how ‘the neighbour’ is endangered by the very existence of ‘an-other’ – a phantasy that should be met with reasonable scepticism. Its flipside is ‘unconditional love’ for the ‘general public’ (the new ‘jedermann’).

If we love the ‘general public’, we lose sight of the abyss of the ‘real neighbour’ next to us, who cannot be generalized

Governing, the impossible profession, must be based on strategies that refuse drawing worst-case scenarios only to nurture a vague fear lurking behind any encounter with the unfathomable small other, the fear that is today used to effect a permanent shift towards an executive monopoly on the idea of a ‘general public,’ to which we owe our unconditional love.

a psychic entity bombards the subject with impossible-to-fulfil imperatives, and then rejoices in the inevitable failure to implement them.

... a new form of hyper(in)activity combined with a demand of self-imposed isolation and false asceticism. To make deprivations of most basic rights enjoyable, such a lack comes along with a hyperactive excess in the form of a new variety of everyday rituals.

I find it almost philosophical. Sometimes it seems to me like the fourth grievance of humanity. #Freud formulated it: The first grievances were that man is not the centre of the universe after all, that we are somehow descended from apes and that we are drive-driven. Now we are offended that we, as a technologized society, are not in control of this little virus. We have not yet learned the necessary sovereignty to deal with it.”[xviii]

“But what does responsible action mean? Is it enough – loosely based on #Schiller – to point out to people their free decision to do the right, sensible thing in the pandemic only out of inclination and without external compulsion? Will they then participate voluntarily? Or do we need – loosely based on Immanuel #Kant – a rather strict indication of duty and responsibility? A kind of pandemic imperative: ‘In a pandemic, always act as if you had tested positive and your counterpart belonged to a risk group’?"

How easy it is to be ‘transgressive’ in times, when almost every human interaction is forbidden by law or morally condemned, if you do not follow the govern-mental injunction to inject a hastily developed vaccine. How easy it is to be perceived as the ‘limitless jouisseur beyond law’, when hyper-legislation regulates even basic breathing habits. After ‘sweets without sugar’, ‘coffee without caffein’, ‘sex without contact’, we arrive at pure ‘existence without life’; we work in highly precarious conditions and then go home for private self-isolation to meet on a digital screen owned by #Google & Co.

Precisely such an ideological manoeuvre is needed to install obligatory #vaccination through the backdoor – a former tabu in a country like Germany that is otherwise never tired of remembering its eugenic past.

... we live in the ‘society’ we enact, support, and, therefore, no less deserve. Never has it been more obvious how ‘society’ itself is an effect of repression.

#philosophy

sylviaj@joindiaspora.com

Mass Psychosis ~ A Killing of the Mind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09maaUaRT4M

This video explores the most dangerous of all #psychic #epidemics, the #mass #psychosis. It is an #epidemic of #madness and it occurs when a large portion of a #society loses touch with #reality and descends into #delusions. Such a phenomenon is not a thing of fiction. Two examples are the #American and #European witch hunts of the16th and 17th centuries and the rise of #totalitarianism in the 20th century.
What is it? How does is start? Has it happened before? Are we experiencing one right now? And if so, how can the stages be reversed?
#akillingofthemind #afterskool #cartoon #menticide #hannaharendt #carljung #vaclavhavel #thomaspaine #truth

jubjubjubjub@joindiaspora.com

When I saw someone share this cartoon from the 1930s online, my first reflex was that it was a fake (Was "misinformation" really a word that people used in the 1930s?) But according to fact-checkers on Snopes, it is genuine — and a remarkably prescient warning to our present day.

Source of the cartoon: “Health in Pictures”, 1930, published by the American Public Health Association.

#misinformation #1930s #cartoon #satire #snopes #factcheck #virus #epidemic #covid #covid19 #vaccination #antivax

dave83@pod.geraspora.de

Ai Weiwei veröffentlicht Film über Lockdown in Wuhan

"Der Künstler Ai Weiwei
hat einen Film über die
Stadt Wuhan und den
Lockdown veröffentlicht.
Er sagt, es gehe um das
"Gespenst" der chinesischen
Staatskontrolle. Die Aufnahmen
sind meist private Clips von
Bürgerinnen und Bürgern."

https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/corona-pandemie-ai-weiwei-veroeffentlicht-film-ueber.2849.de.html?drn:news_id=1164784

#CoronavirusKrankheit2019
#CoronavirusDisease2019
#Infektionskrankheit
#InfectiousDisease
#CoronaPandemie
#CoronaPandemic
#Dokumentarfilm
#Dokumentation
#Staatskontrolle
#Documentary
#SARS-CoV-2
#StateControl
#Erkrankung
#Coronation
#Lockdown
#Pandemie
#Pandemic
#AiWeiwei
#Epidemie
#Epidemic
#Infection
#Infektion
#Covid19
#Disease
#Corona
#Wuhan
#China
#Doku
#Virus
#Film

dredmorbius@joindiaspora.com

COVID-19: A Laycat's guide to what to consider / watch for

Sources of information are sufficiently easy to find, and developments fast enough, that I"m not going to keep up with all developments. I cannot. See my comprehensive post from 4 days ago for sources.

Items covered here:

  • What to consider.
  • What to expect and look for.
  • Basic safety tips.

What to consider

Again: China appears to be containing the epidemic. Growth is now several times larger outside China than in.

Outside of China, COVID-19 seems to be entering its epidemic / growth phase. Testing and monitoring have been insufficient, widely criticised, and are likely to continue to be in many regions.

Writing of Iran two days ago, I suggested that the case count given death rate looked too low. That hunch was rapidly corroborated by experts, and Iran's case counts have since climbed into plausible territory for surveillance, but likely represent the ground truth of two weeks ago. Spread both within and outside Iran based on travellers monitored elsewhere suggests a current widespread epidemic.

Similar logic holds true epecially for Egypt which likewise has a low official case count but numerous travellers passing through Egypt testing positive for SARS-CoV-2.

In South Korea, by contrast, the total tests administered are high in number, the possible cases fairly large, but the death count low. Many tests are returning negative, suggesting that test coverage is wider than the epidemic's reach, a good thing. The corresponding mortality rate is also low, suggesting marginal cases are being detected.

In both cases, the key information is that incomplete reporting and monitoring may be identified by comparing the high-severity case count and deaths to the expected averages. That's about five perecent severe cases, and a total case fatality rate (CFR) of 3.4%. (Revised upwards in the past day.)

The U.S. has recently eased limits on who is tested and taken measures for more test kits to be produced. Expect total case counts to rise, quite possibly by large amounts. Key is to look at the case-mix: mild, moderate, severe, deaths, and recovered cases. More mild and moderate cases relatively is a good sign and indicates more complete monitoring.

U.S. leadership of the COVID-19 effort, particularly at the White House, leaves much to be desired. This is unfortunate, but a reality. I'd prefer not to focus discussion on the who, though the what should be done is open for discussion.

Characteristics of COVID-19 other than its raw transmissibility are major considerations. The long asymptomatic-but-infectious period, relative ease of spread through droplets, possible airborne or other transmissions (the Diamond Princess spread raises questions of how 600+ members of the 3,500 passengers and crew were infected), possibly re-infection or re-emergence, and a fairly high 3.4% CFR, nondistinct early symptoms, faulty test protocols, limited test kits, long lag between infection and test reports (2 weeks), rapid growth rate, and institutional and governmental denial, all increase the risks posed by this epidemic.

There's a very long lag between an infection occurring and it being counted, about two weeks. This means that all available infection count data in growth regions is a look into the past, and actual _current infections are likely as much as 100x greater. This fact has been missed in virtually all mainstream coverage I've seen, though some medical sources are discussing this. The problem is that we simply don't have current confirmed measurements to tell us how bad things are, we have to extrapolate based on existing measurements and models of epidemic spread and growth.

If you're in the U.S., stop thinking in terms of "the outbreak in Washington State". That outbreak has already been detected in North Carolina, and has all but certainly spread elsewhere. Given test protocols, we won't know, probably for another few days. Hopefully in less than a week or two.

What to expect and look for

There are an increasing number of event cancellations, largely voluntary. Google, Facebook, Adobe, and numerous other tech companies have either cancelled conferences or moved them online-only. There are several notable holdouts, most particularly the 2020 Summer Olympics scheduled for June in Tokyo. In Europe there are mandatory cancellations of events and performances as well as school closures. Anticipate further cancellations and the possibility of widespread mandatory cancellations of large gatherings. I would see these as a sign of taking the epidemic seriously and a rational response.

Travel restrictions are also likely to broaden. Outside of China, these have largely involved international travel. WIth a case of the Kirkland, Washington, strain of SARS-CoV-2 appearing in North Carolina, internal spread within countries is a growing issue. Anticipate possible internal travel restrictions within Europe and the United States as well as elsewhere. Again, an inconvenient measure, but one not unwarranted or unreasonable.

Product rationing and supply-chain disruptions are likely. Logistics pipelines tend to lag by 2-8 weeks minimum for products arriving from China to elsewhere (which is to say most products). The late-January shutdown in China, somewhat muted by the anticipated closure due to holidays, is likely to start impacting European and American retailers and manufacturers by now. Disruptions within local ports and distribution networks will further snarl distribution, and it's likely that it will take several weeks to start things up again on the other side, when that happens. Logistics tend to be fairly robust, but they've not been tested against shocks like this since major globalised trade began. Exacerbations by panic buying and similar behaviour are also likely.

Financial markets will likely continue to reflect lowered outlooks. If you have no need to sell assets, you're likely ultimately better off not doing so. If you may need to sell to cover obligations ... phasing an asset reallocation over time is less risky than attempting to time the market in one big move. Either way, be prepared for a rocky year.

Again: second-order effects are likely to be the biggest impacts of this outbreak. Worst-case estimates of deaths could number in the tens of thousand to possibly millions, which remains a small fraction of the global population. But disruptions simply to avoid or slow that possibility are likely to have major impacts on local and global economies. Forecasts currently are for growth to halve for 2020, and it's possible that is an optimistic viewpoint. Monetary policy alone can ensure available cash, but won't address supply shortages if those exist of key commodities.

Look for local announcements by state and local health authorities. These should include measures along the lines outlined above, including requests, or requirements, for public-facing institutions and stores to make use of disinfectent and hand gels. Request your local agencies provide this information.

Measures that help the poor and underserved help all. This means sick leave (so your meal or groceries aren't being prepared or stocked by someone who's infected), free coverage for testing and quarantine treatment, healthcare for all, and public health monitoring and preventive measures. Press for these from your representatives and officials.

Keep an eye out for school and work closures. Talk to your manager / employer about policies. Again: request state and local authorities create policies on these points. Sick leave, work-from-home, and other measures should be among those discussed.

Basic safety tips

If you're NOT already sick, MASKS ARE WORSE THAN USELESS. The wrong masks, maks worn or used incorrectly, or when simply not needed, don't help and may increase your risk of disease. Medical personnel are trained in correct use, are at greatest risk, and must be healthy to be able to serve the public. Hoarding masks only limits their access.

If you ARE sick and are travelling among others, a mask may help avoid infecting healthy individuals. It won't help all that much, but even modest protections help reduce spread.

WASH YOUR HANDS. 20 seconds, with soap and water. The virus has a lipid sheath -- a fat-based membrane -- and just soap or detergent alone will break that down and destroy the virus. Warm or hot water is not necessary.

Alcohol-based hand sanitiser is useful when you cannot wash your hands. Barrier protection (gloves) can be used where you must touch public surfaces (transit, elevators, shopping).

See Laurie Garrett's reccomendations on these and additional points in Foreign Policy magazine.

#covid-19 #ncov2019 #coronavirus #epidemic

dredmorbius@joindiaspora.com

COVID-19 Iran: Backing out possible cases by deaths data

This is personal speculation not grounded in any sources. Treat accordingly.

The observed case fatality rate (CFR) for COVID-19 has been about 2-3%, based on Chinese data. There is some reason to believe middle-east susceptibility based on genetic factors is lower than in China, a fact which will actually amplify my conclusions.

Given limited testing and disclosures, coming up with numbers for actual cases in various countries and regions is difficult. Iran quite particularly so, though one could make an argument for the U.S. as well.

Iran officially reports 54 deaths from COVID-19 (Reuters, 2020-03-01), and 978 infected.

This gives a CFR of 5.5%, which is more than double the Chinese rate. That is much higher than expected.

At a 2% CFR, we'd expect the actual basis to be 2,700 cases. At 3%, 1,800.

The baseline would be the case count two weeks ago, with a weekly growth rate of about 10x (see the cases & deaths chart from my earlier summary), which would put actual current infections at 180,000 - 270,000, if containment has been ineffective.

There are reasons to believe Iran's reporting of deaths has itself been downplayed.

On February 28, the BBC reported Iranian coronavirus deaths as high as 210. This gives a range for 7,000 - 10,500 cases, again, two weeks ago, or 100x that now, at 700,000 - 1,050,000.

There are reasons to suspect that number is inflated (it's the bad news the British might be keen to hear). So take it with a grain of salt.

But we end up with a range of possible current infections within Iran between 180,000 and over 1 million.

Which would be a pretty serious situation.

Again, this is speculation, and it's unconfirmed by any reputable sources of which I'm aware. Consider it a possible bounds check on Iranian cases, and any corroborating or debunking sources are strongly appreciated.

#iran #covid-19 #ncov2019 #coronavirus #epidemic #speculation