#dissent

prplcdclnw@diasp.eu

光復香ęøÆļ¼Œę™‚代革命

Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times

[gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/voaheadlines/2024/Sep/16/https---www.voanews.com-a-first-conviction-under-hong-kong-s-security-law-for-wearing-seditious-t-shirt-7785735.html](gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/feeds/voaheadlines/2024/Sep/16/https---www.voanews.com-a-first-conviction-under-hong-kong-s-security-law-for-wearing-seditious-t-shirt-7785735.html)

Originally posted by the Voice of America.
Voice of America content is produced by the Voice of America,
a United States federal government-sponsored entity, and is in
the public domain.

First conviction under Hong Kong's security law for wearing 'seditious' T-shirt

by Reuters

HONG KONG --

A Hong Kong man on Monday pleaded guilty to sedition for wearing a
T-shirt with a protest slogan, becoming the first person convicted
under the city's new national security law passed in March.

Chu Kai-pong, 27, pleaded guilty to one count of "doing with a
seditious intention an act."

Under the new security law, the maximum sentence for the offense has
been expanded from two years to seven years in prison and could even go
up to 10 years if "collusion with foreign forces" was found involved.

Chu was arrested on June 12 at a MTR station wearing a T-shirt with the
slogan "Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times" and a yellow mask
printed with "FDNOL"- the shorthand of another slogan, "five demands,
not one less."

Both slogans were frequently chanted in the huge, sometimes violent,
pro-democracy protests in 2019 and June 12 was a key kick-off day of
the months-long unrests.

Chu told police that he wore the T-shirt to remind people of the
protests, the court heard.

Chief Magistrate Victor So, handpicked by the city leader John Lee to
hear national security cases, adjourned the case to Thursday for
sentencing.

Hong Kong was returned from Britain to China in 1997 under Beijing's
promise of guaranteeing its freedoms, including freedom of speech,
would be protected under a "one country, two systems" formula.

Beijing imposed a national security law in 2020 punishing secession,
subversion, terrorism or collusion with foreign forces with up to life
in prison, after the months-long protests in the financial hub.

In March 2024, Hong Kong passed a second new security law, a home-grown
ordinance also known as "Article 23" according to its parent provision
in the city's mini constitution, the Basic Law.

Critics, including the U.S. government have expressed concerns over the
new security law and said the vaguely defined provisions regarding
"sedition" could be used to curb dissent.

Hong Kong and Chinese officials have said it was necessary to plug
"loopholes" in the national security regime.


Five Demands, Not One Less

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%932020_Hong_Kong_protests#Objectives

#hong-kong #香ęøÆ #human-rights #civil-rights #liberty #freedom #dissent #protest #t-shirt #光復香ęøÆ-ę™‚ä»£é©å‘½ #liberate-hong-kong #sedition #five-demand-not-one-less #fdnol

prplcdclnw@diasp.eu

Upcoming Cybercrime Treaty Will Be Nothing But Trouble

Backed By Russia, the New Treaty Aims to Stifle Dissent

https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/08/07/upcoming-cybercrime-treaty-will-be-nothing-trouble

Cybercrimeā€”the malicious hacking of computer networks, systems, and dataā€”threatens peopleā€™s rights and livelihoods, and governments need to work together to do more to address it. But the cybercrime treaty sitting before the United Nations for adoption, presumably by August 9, could instead facilitate government repression. By expanding government surveillance to investigate crimes, the treaty could create an unprecedented tool for cross-border cooperation in connection with a wide range of offenses, without adequate safeguards to protect people from abuses of power.

#hrw #human-rights-watch #human-rights #cybercrime-treaty #united-nations #un #treaty #civil-rights #dissent

tord_dellsen@diasp.eu

Breaking news: The refusers forced the Israeli government to delay the judicial coup! | Refuser Solidarity Network

We are writing this quickly, as events are unfolding on the ground.

Weeks-long wave of refusal and civil resistance forced the Israeli government yesterday (Monday) to postpone the #anti-democratic judicial coup! Due to the refusers' pressure, on Saturday, the minister of defense, Yoav Galant, had a press conference and announced his opposition to the judicial #coup, citing voices of #dissent in the army as the major reason for his break with his own party and the government. As a result, the prime minister, Netanyahu, fired him on Sunday. The firing led to a huge backlash: mass #protests, a general #strike by universities and trade unions, the blocking of roads across the country and the shutdown of the airport. All this forced the government to postpone the judicial coup. And it all started with the refusers.

Earlier this week the Israeli press overflowed with daily refusal statements and civil resistance announcements. Each day hundreds of reserve soldiers protested against the government and declared their refusal to continue to serve in the Israeli army. Among them are soldiers of the Intelligence Corps soldiers, doctors, combat pilots and more. In a letter sent to the Israeli defense minister, soldiers of the Intelligence Corps wrote:

ā€œOur conscience does not allow us to cooperate with the attempts to change the regime In Israel. An undemocratic Israel is a weak Israel which is dangerous to minorities within it, an Israel with a failing economic system. Our love for the country and the many years we spent serving it compel us to resist.ā€

The act of refusal also worked its way to different sectors of the #army and the Israeli society. 700 Soldiers in the standing army sent out official letters to the minister of defense and the Commander-in-Chief of the Israeli army stating that they will resign from service. Parents of soldiers to be facing mandatory #conscription have reconsidered sending their children to serve in the army and a group of 40 soldiers currently serving their mandatory conscription filmed a video vowing not to serve an undemocratic government.

On Friday, the Israeli army Commander-in-Chief warned that the Israeli army is disintegrating and that military operations are at risk due to massive amounts of refusals caused by the judicial coup. Israeli prime minister Netanyahu addressed the unprecedented crisis the army is facing and mentioned that refusing to serve in the military is a great danger to Israel.

The refusal wave puts the government in an unparalleled #crisis, and this crisis is a huge #opportunity. This represents a massive crack in the Israeli mainstreamā€™s conviction that the army is used purely for defense. It is a moment of deep change in the worldviews of the Israeli citizenry, that could allow the anti-occupation movement to show Israelis that a democracy only for some people, is not a democracy at all.

Although this could be a time to celebrate decades of hard work leading to a moment of success, the fight is far from over. The reforms have only been postponed and not canceled. Netanyahu called for the army to punish the #refusers, and to get the majority needed to approve a delay in the legislation, Netanyahu promised an ultra-nationalist party to create a new ā€œnational guardā€ under the control of Itamar Ben Gvir, the leader of an extreme #right-wing party. All this means that leveraging the protests to fight the occupation is a challenge, and there is no democracy without an end to the #occupation.

Refuser Solidarity Network continues to support local Israeli refusers. We support efforts to use this moment to expand the anti-occupation movement and continue the fight to bring an end to the occupation.

Source: https://mailchi.mp/refuser/refusers-solidarity-15085353

#Israel #RefuserSolidarityNetwork

diggers@diaspora-fr.org

#FBI attacks #Uhuru #Movement on July 29, 2022 - Hands Off #Uhuru!

uhuru

Click on picture or you'll find the #Video here: https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=v2reuou9GXA

They use their law, merely the opinion of the ruling #class, to villainize us and justify their violence.

The period that our #Party has worked to usher in is one where the colonial world hegemon, the United States, is weakened politically, economically and ideologically. People around the world, who have been forced to live under the brutal domination of U.S. #imperialism, are rising up and fighting back, refusing to be bullied and beaten to continue the theft of our land and resources.
https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=v2reuou9GXA

Thereā€™s nothing that the white world has obtained for itself that has not been stolen from #African, Indigenous and all other #colonized nations throughout the #world.

The anti-colonial #struggle thatā€™s heating up across the planet is driving the global system of #colonial #capitalism into great peril. Not only this, the U.S. is facing challengers to its economic and #military #power, primarily in the form of #Russia and increasingly, #China.

Source: https://apspuhuru.org/2022/08/01/hands-off-the-uhuru-movement/


#Africa #fascism #Westernworld #dissident #dissent #rights #USA #politics

diggers@diaspora-fr.org

A developing evil: the malignant historical force behind the #Great #Reset

Source: https://winteroak.org.uk/2022/08/02/a-developing-evil-the-malignant-historical-force-behind-the-great-reset/

red

The so-called Great Reset is nothing but the extension and violent #acceleration of a longstanding process.

It is the increase of centralising power, the tightening of control, the growth of ā€œthe #economy ā€, the ever-closer convergence of #power and #money.

Continuous #industrial #development has been the background to all our lives, but it is not necessarily something of which we are always conscious.

The first thing I observed was that there was always local opposition to any proposed development on a greenfield area ā€“ the bigger the project, the greater the opposition.

Several methods were used to ensure that development triumphed over the wishes of the local people.

The first was for local politicians and officials to denigrate opponents of the scheme in question, in which ever way seemed most appropriate.

If the #opponents were local people living close to the proposed development, they were selfish individuals termed NIMBYs ā€“ Not In My Back Yard.

If people from further away were involved, who could not be accused of having a purely personal interest, they were dubbed ā€œoutside agitatorsā€ or ā€œrent-a-mob troublemakersā€.

In this way, no #dissent could ever be seen as legitimate.

I also came across a degree of #corruption, of course, of very close connections between local officials and the property development businesses whose projects they authorised.

But behind these levels of #propaganda and corruption was something else, something even more important: the ā€œneedā€ for development was written into the bureaucratic planning structures devised by central government, with which local authorities had to comply.

The overall process of development itself was sacrosanct and officially ensured.

All the language and arguments in favour of development therefore served not so much to convince people that it was necessary, as to cloak the reality that it would in any case be imposed on them against their will by central power.

A narrative is always needed to dress up development and sell it to the public.

This idea of ā€œunderdevelopmentā€ is, he concludes, ā€œa manipulative trick to involve people in struggles for getting what the powerful want to impose on themā€

Those pushing this #agenda are happy to cynically exploit the naivety of those who fall for the lie and enthusiastically jump aboard the bandwagon of ā€œhelpingā€ those who have not yet been turned into what Otto Ulrich calls ā€œa mechanical cog in a great production apparatus dominated by the world marketā€.

In #Europe, a key #institution promoting development is The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, founded sixty years ago

The ā€œFirst UN Development Decadeā€ between 1960 and 1970, which claimed to identify a problem with ā€œunderdevelopedā€ people, again insisted that its aim was to improve the quality of their lives

In 1970 it launched an International Development Strategy and an associated UN resolution announced a unified approach to development and planning, ā€œwhich would fully integrate the economic and social components in the formulation of policies and programmesā€.

In 1986 the #UN went even further when it published its Declaration on the Right to Development.

Although this text clearly identified the aim of establishing what it called ā€œa new international economic orderā€, it hid this agenda behind the absurd statement that ā€œthe right to development is an inalienable human rightā€.

ā€œStates have the duty to co-operate with each other in ensuring development and eliminating obstacles to developmentā€.

In 1990 the United Nations Development Programme published its first Human Development Report, defending the inalienable right of all human beings to be developed.

then ten years later, in 2000, it launched its Millennium Development Goals, based on the International Development Goals drawn up at Chateau de la Muette by the OECDā€™s Development Assistance Committee

Private-public partnerships were very much encouraged. Goal 8 was ā€œto develop a global partnership for developmentā€, which could mean ā€œcooperation with #pharmaceutical #companiesā€ or making available the ā€œbenefits of new technologiesā€ by working with Big Tech

It has also long been interested in so-called ā€œrural developmentā€, aiming to ā€œincrease #production and raise #productivityā€ by means of what it calls a ā€œtransition from traditional isolationā€. The #World #Bank would like to enable the ā€œtransfer of people out of low productivity #agriculture into more rewarding pursuitsā€.

It is not for nothing that the World Bank/IFC use the #slogan ā€œCreating #Markets, Creating #> Opportunitiesā€ (21). For all the do-good language, the bottom line is that investment, like development, is really about making money and accumulating power.

The World Bank has been peddling the #greenwashing scam of so-called ā€œsustainable developmentā€ for quite a while now.

In reality, the ā€œsustainableā€ development they are promoting is every bit of an oxymoron as ā€œequitableā€ development, being just another aspect of the camouflage with which its proponents hide the reality of their insidious agenda from public view.

*As Esteva writes, ā€œSustainable development has been explicitly conceived as a strategy for sustaining ā€˜developmentā€™, not for supporting the flourishing and enduring of an infinitely diverse natural and social lifeā€. *

But because they donā€™t want this profoundly undemocratic situation to be visible, they also construct the propaganda layer which aims, like the propaganda about the need for local ā€œdevelopmentā€, to conceal the true nature of the process.

Because the development mafia depicts itself as representing ā€œgoodā€, all those who go against its agenda must necessarily be ā€œbadā€ ā€“ reactionary, right-wing, conspiracy theorists.

###The process which calls itself ā€œdevelopmentā€ in fact equates to nothing other than #destruction, in every context.

As Sachs writes: ā€œSuspicion grows that development was a misconceived enterprise from the beginning. Indeed, it is not the failure of development which has to be feared, but its success. What would a completely developed world look like?ā€ (28)

It would simply be a dead world.

read on: https://winteroak.org.uk/2022/08/02/a-developing-evil-the-malignant-historical-force-behind-the-great-reset/


#GreatReset #winteroak #4IR #capitalism #new_normal

diggers@diaspora-fr.org

#Brainwashing Ourselves: How Digital #Technology is Destroying #Democracy

Source: https://modernheretic.com/brainwashing-ourselves-how-digital-technology-is-destroying-democracy

Accordingly, #digital technology is upheaving our culture and displacing the traditions and norms we were accustomed to, leaving many of us feeling unmoored and undermining our political values.

#Online conversations quickly developed controls in the form of moderatorsā€”authoritarian figures who established the rules of engagement and who got to decide what speech was worthy and what was not.

There was a resultant demand for more controls. #Ignore buttons popped up and were quickly used for individuals who espoused ideas that the user disagreed with, limiting their exposure to different ideas and establishing the pattern for the silo-ization of the internet that is dominant today.

Unlike the offline world in which people were judged through personal knowledge, direct observation, and reputation, individuals online could only be judged by the content of their digital output, which reduced them to flat, dehumanized vectors of information to be categorized as #good or #bad

Thus, the new controls spawned by the digital realm to deal with #information overload involved the establishment of a binary, ideological filter to judge whether informationā€”as well as the poster of that informationā€”should be included or excluded in a particular #community.

Unfortunately, once the ideological binary is established as the moral paradigm, group discourse becomes a never-ending #witch hunt.

Group leaders and members are on constant lookout for potential immorality as represented by supposed outsiders to the #group. Anyone who disturbs the group harmony with deviant thoughts can find themselves the sudden target of paranoiac suspicion.

Every #conversation becomes a purity test of sorts, and the only way to prove that you are one of the ā€œgoodā€ guys is to make your expressions a reflection of the groupā€™s worldview

#Groupthink became the norm, and anyone who deviated from the group too much would be seen as a danger to the group who needed to be punished or eliminated.

Thus, thanks to the #internet, #intolerance for dissent and demands for #censorship arose as aspirational values of a new moral order.

Consequently, the controls that developed in response to digital technology were exactly those controls that are used in the formation of cults and #totalitarian #regimes, tools to ensure that every person falls in line with the orthodoxy as determined by the leadership of the group.

  1. control of information within an environment (moderation, fact checks, content #warnings, removal of information, prioritizing certain viewpoints, etc.);

    1. demands for purity in thought to assure that everyone conforms to the group
    2. sacred truths that cannot be questioned without some form of reprisal, usually removal from the group or platform
    3. the reduction of complex ideas to trite slogans and memes
    4. control over who belongs to the group and who does not
    5. the subordination of the individual to the group

These totalitarian #controls are quotidian at this point, and anyone who participates in discourse on the internet is exposed on a daily basis to enormous pressure to conform their thoughts to the narratives that are perpetuated by those in control of the internet fora.

Without realizing it, we slowly brainwashed ourselves over time with our uncritical and pervasive use of digital technology.

It was therefore inevitable that once we accepted these digital values as normal, they would then infiltrate our offline interactions.

While we think of ourselves as using digital tools to change our world, in reality digital technology is changing us.

Most people in the Western world are never disconnected from the totalitarian culture of the internet. That is why digital cultural norms are now dominating our #society

In effect, the digital controls that developed in order to control the overabundance of information on the internet led to polarized, cultish thinking and conditioning people to believe that totalitarianism is a necessary form of regulation in todayā€™s world.

#Dissent is now treated as a danger that needs to be eradicated. Worse still, this cultish conditioning is bleeding into the #offline world so that anti-democratic, authoritarian measures are increasingly seen as normal in the ā€œfreeā€ world.

Many people are chilled from speaking, not just online where they may end up banned by a tech platform, but offline where they face the possible consequences of losing jobs, networking opportunities, and friendships.

The universe of ideas that is acceptable to be expressed is rapidly shrinking and people are exposed to fewer ideas that challenge their views, which further reinforces their #intolerance for differences of opinion in a cyclical manner.

Much like George #Orwell ā€™s #doublespeak, people in contemporary society are pressured to conceal their true thoughts and dilute their public messages to the point that they become anodyne and meaningless enough that the mob will tolerate them.

Thus, facts, #transparency, and rationality are inimical to digital culture. Conformity, not #truth, is the driving force of digital culture.

By programming individuals to become accustomed to totalitarian regulations on a personal level, it was inevitable that these digital norms would also pervade the political realm.

Anything that could allow a person or group to express an unorthodox idea is suspicious, and therefore in digital culture, the concept of free speech is inherently dangerous.

The paternalistic notion that individuals must be protected from corruption by bad ideas has taken hold of our culture. And this type of milieu control of information enables independent thought to be supplanted by majoritarian #propaganda just as it does in other totalitarian environments.

The assumption that the individual is neither competent to judge the quality of information nor strong enough to be exposed to information of allegedly dubious quality now reigns supreme, bolstering the new flourishing culture of censorship.

They are dismissive because they actually want a world with limited speech, where the window of permissible thought is narrow enough to exclude all the speech they disagree with.

Thus, while digital culture proponents often nominally claim to want to protect minority groups, their insistence on conformity to majoritarian standards ensures that genuine diversity cannot exist in the new moral order

#Speech is an outward expression of inner beliefs, and the loss of freedom of speech is dangerous because it is a threat to the ability to hold and practice a belief system that differs from the orthodoxy.

Consequently, digital morality is a direct attack on #minority rights.


#newnormal

wist@diasp.org

A quotation by Commager, Henry Steele

We should not forget that our tradition is one of protest and revolt, and it is stultifying to celebrate the rebels of the past ā€” Jefferson and Paine, Emerson and Thoreau ā€” while we silence the rebels of the present.

Henry Steele Commager (1902-1998) American historian, writer, activist

ā€œWho Is Loyal to America?ā€ Harperā€™s Magazine #1168 (Sep 1947)

#quote #quotation #america #celebration #dissent #history #past #present #protest #rebel

More notes and sourcing on WIST: https://wist.info/commager-henry-steele/51437/

steelnomad@diasp.org

ā€‹Militarism and the police: how our streets became battlefields

When faced with #conflict, human beings respond in various ways and often choose #solutions that avoid #violence. We are very good at #negotiating, #communicating, #cooperating, as well as, of course, submitting to those more #powerful than us. Violence in our societies is pervasive; it is experienced every day by victims of #crime, domestic and more. But the systemic way #armies and #militarized #police units plan and prepare for the use of overwhelming violence is specific and unique.

A key example of militarized #policing is the #suppression of #protest and #dissent. Social movements come into conflict with the #authorities via lobbying, #protests or direct actions. Authorities respond to these #conflicts in various ways, sometimes reaching for militarized options. This violence is planned, trained for, repeatedly rehearsed and often delivered in a calculated way that aims to disorientate, overwhelm or eliminate the perceived enemy or threat.

Through the lens of #militarism, conflict stops being something that drives #change and #transformation; it becomes a #threat to be neutralized and the individuals and groups driving conflict become enemies akin to a foreign invading #army. Violence of this nature relies on its perpetratorsā€™ #obedience to orders, the #dehumanization of its victims, and a heightened perception of threat.

The experiences of the democracy movement in #HongKong serve as one particularly extreme example. While in Hong Kong these tactics have been deployed by an #authoritarian #government, we have seen similar examples of police violence leveled against #activists across the world ā€” in Chile, France, Germany, Indonesia, Myanmar, South Africa, South Korea and the US, to name but a few.

#peace #propeace #HumanRights

charlie10@pluspora.com

What this ProPublica piece fails to reveal is that Chicago is keeping those 20 Libraries open because itā€™s cheaper than what it would cost to house Chicago's 16,451 registered homeless students, about 4.5 percent of its student body

.
Homeless children have no internet access. That means they will be prevented from taking part in the Chicago Public School's online study program during the elongated school closings due to COVID-19. Ā Ā 

As if those kids didnā€™t have it bad enough already. Ā So Chicagoā€™s mayor, Lori Lightfoot, is doing what she can to help those kids by keeping those 20 Libraries open. Everything is not always black and white.
.
ProPublica should have delved a little deeper to understand that during last fall's Chicago Teachers Union Strike, one of the teacherā€™s main demands was for the Chicago to provide housing for these deeply disadvantaged students. Mayor Lightfoot refused. It was because she had to negotiate where she could within budget constraints. Again, everything is not always black and white. Shame on you, ProPublica.

.
enter image description here

.
Hereā€™s where having a Democrat in the Oval Office and a democrat-heavy Senate and House would make a world of difference. Instead of giving tax cuts to the 1% and multi billion dollar corporations, we could be helping cities like Chicago tackle this travesty of so many children being denied a chance at life.

No, we do not need a revolution to fix this. All we need is sane, humane people in key positions of government who do the right thing while keeping an eye on a balanced budget ā€¦. so we can keep doing the right thing.

Bernie helped ensure Hillaryā€™s electoral defeat in 2016 and that is why things are as bad as they are today. Now, many of Bernieā€™s people are saying that they refuse to vote for Biden because they are furious, AGAIN, that Bernie isnā€™t going to be the nominee. If that happens, AGAIN, it will be on the shoulders of those immature, self-serving Bernie supporters that those homeless children in Chicago (and other cities) will remain homeless forever. Those who repeat 2016 had better not think for a minute that anyone is going to buy their lies about caring about people. Once was enough. Twice would be an insult to intelligence. If Sanders allows his followers to pull the same stunt, his name will be remembered in infamy. And he will deserve every trashing he gets from every historian who mentions his name. So will the generation who helped him. They will be remembered as the antithesis of "The Greatest Generation.ā€

#mywork #socialism #socialists #capitalism #dissent #Politics #Democrats #Election2020 #Warren #Sanders #FauxDisagreement #AmericaHatesProgressives #progressives #centrist #FollowTheMoney #DSA #Democrats #Liberals #gop #diaspora #friendica #USpolitics #Bernie2020 #FightThePower #election2020 ShelennAyres @Shelenn Ayres
https://www.propublica.org/article/chicago-public-libraries-are-staying-open-even-though-librarians-say-it-is-not-safe