#lenin

mikhailmuzakmen@pod.geraspora.de

#politik #ukraine #russland #nato #usa #deutschland #kriegshetze #medien #karlkraus #lenin #imperialismus #wk1 #geschichte

»… stel­len wir uns ein­mal vor, ein Skla­ven­hal­ter, Besit­zer von 100 Skla­ven, läge im Krieg mit einem ande­ren Skla­ven­hal­ter, Besit­zer von 200 Skla­ven, um die ›gerech­te‹ Neu­auf­tei­lung der Skla­ven. Es ist klar, dass die Anwen­dung der Begrif­fe ›Ver­tei­di­gungs­krieg‹ oder ›Vater­land­ver­tei­di­gung‹ auf einen sol­chen Fall his­to­risch ver­lo­gen und prak­tisch ein glat­ter Betrug wäre, began­gen von geris­se­nen Skla­ven­hal­tern am ein­fa­chen Volk, an den Klein­bür­gern, an der unauf­ge­klär­ten Mas­se. Ganz genau­so wer­den im gegen­wär­ti­gen Krieg, den die Skla­ven­hal­ter füh­ren, um die Skla­ve­rei auf­recht­zu­er­hal­ten und zu ver­stär­ken, die Völ­ker von der heu­ti­gen impe­ria­lis­ti­schen Bour­geoi­sie mit­tels der ›natio­na­len‹ Ideo­lo­gie und des Begriffs der Vater­lands­ver­tei­di­gung betrogen.«

  • W.I.Lenin, »Sozia­lis­mus und Krieg« 1915
mikhailmuzakmen@pod.geraspora.de

#politik #ukraine #russland #nato #usa #deutschland #kriegshetze #medien #karlkraus #lenin #imperialismus #wk1 #geschichte

»Es ist nicht Sache der Sozia­lis­ten, dem jün­ge­ren und kräf­ti­ge­ren Räu­ber zu hel­fen, die älte­ren, satt­ge­fres­se­nen Räu­ber aus­zu­plün­dern. Die Sozia­lis­ten haben den Kampf zwi­schen den Räu­bern aus­zu­nut­zen, um sie alle­samt zu besei­ti­gen.« (W.I.Lenin 1915)

Spätimperialistische Brandbeschleuniger

Schon vor gut 100 Jahren wurden Krieg gepredigt und Kriegsfolgen verharmlost. Eine Spurensuche mit Lenin und Karl Kraus (Von Detlef Kannapin)

... Der Unter­schied zur Hoch-Zeit des Impe­ria­lis­mus besteht ledig­lich dar­in, dass seit der Selbst­ab­schaf­fung des sozia­lis­ti­schen Welt­sys­tems eine Gegen­kraft staat­li­cher­seits nicht mehr vor­han­den ist, die sol­chen Machen­schaf­ten wir­kungs­voll Paro­li bie­ten könn­te. Die­se Form einer feh­len­den (oder gar nicht mehr denk­mög­lich ange­streb­ten) Alter­na­ti­ve erklärt auch die heil­lo­se Ver­wir­rung und Ver­stri­ckung vie­ler sich als links ver­ste­hen­der Zeit­ge­nos­sen in Oppor­tu­nis­mus und Pessimismus.

Gewis­ser­ma­ßen nega­tiv gewen­det beweist der kapi­ta­lis­ti­sche Medi­en­ver­bund von Tages­pres­se bis zu den halb­wegs sozia­len Medi­en die End­zeit­stim­mung des Spät­im­pe­ria­lis­mus in unwi­der­spro­che­ner Far­ce. Das Ham­bur­ger Nach­rich­ten­ma­ga­zin »Der Spie­gel« mutier­te inner­halb zwei­er Mona­te vom selbst­er­nann­ten Sturm­ge­schütz der Demo­kra­tie zum Sturm­ge­schütz sans phra­se, im wahrs­ten Sin­ne des Wor­tes. In den dies­jäh­ri­gen Hef­ten 4 und 5 der »Blät­ter für deut­sche und inter­na­tio­na­le Poli­tik« erschei­nen mit einem Mal Ana­ly­sen der mar­tia­len Wehr­haf­tig­keit, auf dass sich die frü­he­re Frie­dens­for­schung mehr­fach die Augen rei­ben müss­te. Die Tas­ta­tu­ren im Bezahl­mo­dus ver­wan­deln sich in kom­mu­ni­zie­ren­de Kano­nen­roh­re und die auf ihnen getipp­ten Urtei­le kön­nen, wie der His­to­ri­ker Eric Hobs­bawm bemerk­te, Todes­ur­tei­le sein. Alles, was unter­halb des Atom­krie­ges fir­miert, gilt als Vater­lands­ver­rat. Lenins Lakai­en­zim­mer ist bes­tens bestückt. Karl Kraus wäre nicht erstaunt, aber sicher mora­lisch gebrochen.

So bleibt als ein­zi­ger Aus­weg die abschre­cken­de Rekru­tie­rung von Leu­ten wie Mathi­as Döpf­ner, Niko­laus Blo­me, Sascha Lobo, Fried­rich Merz, Neef, Anna­le­na Baer­bock, Ralf Fücks, Marie­lui­se Beck, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zim­mer­mann u.v.a. ins Kriegs­ge­biet. Immer­hin haben sie am lau­tes­ten in die Kriegs­trom­pe­te getu­tet. Ganz wich­tig ist dabei, dass sie in den Mann­schafts­dienst­gra­den (Sol­da­ten, Gefrei­te, Unter­of­fi­zie­re bis maxi­mal Feld­we­bel) ein­grup­piert wer­den und nicht in die rück­wär­ti­gen Diens­te (=Etap­pe) kom­men – damit sie das, was sie pro­pa­gie­ren, auch end­lich aus­le­ben dür­fen. Wer als spät­im­pe­ria­lis­ti­scher Brand­be­schleu­ni­ger beden­ken­los den Waf­fen­gang pre­digt, hat ihn gefäl­ligst selbst zu beschrei­ten. Sie müs­sen dabei aber auf­pas­sen, dass sie nicht dem OUN-Beauf­trag­ten für Kern­eu­ro­pa, Andrij Mel­nyk d.J., in die Hän­de fallen.

Sehr lesenswerter Artikel zu den Parallelen der Zeit vor dem sog. ersten Weltkrieg und heute im Politik und Medien
- https://www.nd-aktuell.de/artikel/1163592.krieg-spaetimperialistische-brandbeschleuniger.html

olladij@diaspora.permutationsofchaos.com

Putin führt seinen Angriffskrieg gegen die #Ukraine fort. Während in der Ukraine gegen die Invasion Putins angekämpft wird, kämpfen Putins #Propaganda - #Medien einen Desinformationskrieg, die die Reaktionen seiner Widersacher lähmen sollen und seine Kriegsverbrechen rechtfertigen. Es werden viele Narrative und Meldungen verbreitet, die #Putin unterstützen sollen. In seinen Begründungen für seinen #Krieg nannte Vladimir Putin eine angebliche „Entnazifizierung“ der Ukraine als einen der Kriegsgründe. Schauen wir uns diese vorgeschobene #Lüge an und entlarven sie, als das, was sie ist.

https://www.volksverpetzer.de/ukraine/entnazifizierung-fake/ #geschichte #donbass #nazis #lenin #selenskyj #asow #wagner

fiel@diaspora-fr.org

#Ukraine (début XXème)

Vidéo 59 minutes

"Nestor Makhno Payasans d'Ukraine" : HD Documentaire d'Hélène Chatelain. (1996)

Portrait de l'anarchiste Nestor Makhno qui est à l'initiative des premières communes libertaires autogérées en Ukraine, des soviets libres. Nestor Makhno défend les pauvres, la culture et la liberté, en 1917, il exproprie les aristocrates et les terres deviennent propriété sociale, un agriculteur ne pouvant posséder que la superficie qu'il peut cultiver seul sans salarié. Cette insurrection libertaire dans les terres cosaques est une des plus exemplaires réalisations de l'idéal anarchiste communiste, portée par la population, sur sa terre.

Simultanément, il lutte victorieusement contre les Russes blancs avec son armée, la Makhnovchtchina. Mais en 1921 son alliée se retourne contre lui, l'armée rouge sous les ordres de Trotski détruit la Makhnovchtchina et contraint Makhno à l'exil, il finira sa vie à Paris. Nestor Makhno en 1919, extrait d'un film d'archives découvert par Hélène Châtelain.

Dans ce portait, Hélène Châtelain retrouve et reprend les écrits de Makhno, depuis ses journaux de jeunesse. Elle va à Goulaï-Polié et les fait lire aux actuels habitants. Son enquête en Ukraine1, révèle ce que les mémoires conservent de lui, le batko («le petit père»).

L'iconographie, les nombreux documents d'archives et les témoignages montrent cette légendaire figure insurrectionnelle mais aussi ce que la propagande communiste a voulu faire de lui : un paysan attardé, fou sanguinaire et antisémite. Avec les preuves récoltées, Hélène Châtelain démonte les accusations calomnieuses que les dirigeants communistes ont répandu, par exemple sur le prétendu antisémitisme de Makhno, alors qu'il l'a combattu dès ses premières actions. (wikipedia)

Lectures complémentaires
Entretien avec Hélène Chatelain (audio)

#nestor-makhno #nestormachno, #makhnovshchina, #paysan, #anarchiste, ukraine #revolte #revolution, #anarchisme #luttesdesclasses #insurrection #expropriation #voline, #arshinov, #helene-chatelain russie #urss #soviets #bolsheviks #bolshevism, #lenin, #trotsky #franciscoFerrer, #revolutionRusse

bliter@diaspora-fr.org

#Capitalisme vs #Communisme : #analyse d'un #combat #idéologique - l'Observateur

La Timeline 👉
00:00:00 Introduction
00:00:38 Le capitalisme et ses #évolutions
00:06:49 Naissance de la #lutte #ouvrière
00:08:51 Les #théoriciens de l #’idéologie #socialiste
00:12:11 #KarlMarx et sa #critique du capitalisme
00:23:53 Karl Marx et sa critique du #couple #bourgeois
00:28:16 Quand Karl Marx éclatait les #féministes.
00:30:42 La lutte des #classes
00:33:46 La #nature de l’ #entrepreneur : ce que #Marx n’a jamais compris
00:41:02 #Vladimir #Lenin : l’ #espion #allemand qui a détruit la #Russie
00:44:31 Marx et Lenin, ces #communistes qui n’ont jamais travaillé
00:46:33 Le communisme de retour en #Europe ( le #néo-communisme )
00:55:27 Le #danger, c’est l’ #état
00:56:31 La #tendance de certains #peuples a la soumission
01:02:37 Le #régime idéal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ7G2H2HBlE
#politique #économie

olladij_tudajev@joindiaspora.com

Fallstricke der #Emanzipation. Autoritäres und Regressives in der Linken gestern und heute. Alle Verhältnisse umzuwerfen, in denen der Mensch ein erniedrigtes, ein geknechtetes, ein verlassenes, ein verächtliches Wesen ist. Besser lassen sich Anspruch und Programm menschlicher Emanzipation nicht auf den Punkt bringen. Wenn der Begriff Links Sinn hat, dann diesen. Oft sehen linke #Theorie und #Praxis jedoch ganz anders aus. Was längst überwunden sein sollte, lebt auch in vielen linken und linksradikalen Strukturen und Denkweisen fort: Die #Herrschaft von Zwangsgemeinschaften und von Menschen über andere Menschen. Was unterscheidet #Kapitalismus|kritik von antikapitalistischem Ressentiment? Welche Mindestanforderungen müssen emanzipatorische Bewegungen erfüllen? https://www.mixcloud.com/red-q-read/quergelesen-211221/
#marx #bakunin #lenin #kritik #linke #gewalt #dath #podcast #antifa #ddr #faschismus #islam #antisemitismus

olladij_tudajev@joindiaspora.com

Traditionsgemäß begeht die #Linke am 8. Mai den Jahrestag der Befreiung vom #Nazifaschismus. Ebenso traditionsgemäß diskutiert man, ob man eher eine „antideutsche Sexparty“ feiern oder eher der gefallenen KämferInnen gedenken sollte. (Es ist vielleicht auch nicht falsch, sich das jedes Jahr zu fragen. So besteht wenigstens eine geringe Chance, dass sich jemand irgendwas dabei denkt). Jedenfalls bedankt man sich bei den Alliierten in den Sprachen, die man kennt, und schmückt die Räumlichkeiten linker Biotope mit Plakaten und Aufklebern, auf denen man unter Anderem das berühmte Bild mit drei Rotarmisten sieht, die eine rote Fahne auf dem Dach des Reichstags befestigen. Nicht alle kennen die #Geschichte dahinter. Je mehr #Zeit vergeht, desto mehr Menschen wollen mitgemacht haben. Es ist wie der legendäre Holzbalken, den 1920 während des Maisubbotniks gefühlt Hunderte von Menschen zusammen mit W. I. #Lenin auf dem Roten Platz getragen haben.

https://dasgrossethier.wordpress.com/2017/05/08/zum-8-mai-ueber-die-gerechtigkeit-eines-soldaten/
#reichstag #deutschland #berlin #rotearmee #berest #stalin #ukraine #krieg #gulag #8mai

prorivists@diasp.org

LENIN!


Lenin’s name is mainly used among left-wingers to cover up the poverty of one’s own thoughts, and the most unbridled opportunism is seasoned with the authority of Lenin’s words. Left-wing impostors take from the treasury of Lenin’s legacy some quotes which they do not understand and compile them into their ideology.

And those of them, who do not pursue provocative goals, as a rule, carefully copy Leninist thoughts and actions, although they know that Marxism requires the independent application of materialistic dialectics.

The situation now has developed in such a way that every supporter of communism is obliged to put all available forces on an independent study of Marxism-Leninism from the source, on an independent study of the practical heritage of the Leninist-Stalinist leadership of the revolution and communist construction.

And for us, Lenin should be the standard of man, so every communist must match him, like to Marx, Engels, and Stalin.

There is an opinion that in Bolshevism, the standards of which we strive for, different types of activists are needed. What is needed, they say, is Lenin, who will show us the way, but there must also be an ordinary, efficient and dependable Party member, who does not even think about comparing himself with Lenin, to be matched to Lenin. He is like a „techie“ of party work. This is the wrong, false approach.

What is more — common or different between Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin as individuals? In their worldview, in the strength of their will and characters.

Practice shows that there is a Marxist character, a Marxist type of personality, a Bolshevik style of man. And the classics of Marxism, as concrete people, personalities, scientists, revolutionaries, propagandists, organizers, leaders, are the standards of such a person. Every Marxist should will to become like them, should imitate them as much as possible.

The complexity of world-historical tasks objectively dictates the need to carefully, meticulously study Marxism-Leninism as a theory and practice, in order not only to stand upon the shoulders of the titans, but also if you do not surpass the classics in their levels of scientific preparation and organizational abilities, then at least get close to them. And here, as a rule, everything rests on the attitude of people towards self-education and their willful qualities in this regard.

Until we arrange to forge of cadres in Marxist-Leninist patterns, we cannot see our victory. Including self-education in the spirit of Marxism, in the spirit of imitating our character’s disposition to our beloved leaders. Such imitation is nothing but a form of Marxist self-discipline.

Get inspired by the personality, the way of life, the victories of Lenin! Get inspired by Marx, Engels, Stalin! To vigorously work for communism, firmly and faithfully serve the working class, people and the progress of mankind!

https://prorivists.org/eng/

#lang_en #lang-en #en #lenin #marxism #leninism

dredmorbius@joindiaspora.com

If you want to make sense of the current political moment, and why electoral politics under capitalism can never, and will never, serve anyone but the wealthy capitalists, look no further than the most influential political theorist of the 20th century: Vladimir Lenin.

A thread.

If you are like me, you did not read Lenin in High School. You did not read him in college. You have never seen his ideas debated on TV. No politician has ever claimed to be inspired by him, or even mentioned his name.

Strange, for someone so influential across the globe.

Why is it that in America, the supposed land of free speech, we cannot read or discuss someone who inspired millions of workers, and continues to inspire millions across the globe? The man whose ideology was the official State ideology of some of the largest countries on Earth ...

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1248728086834601984.html

#economics #ExistentialComics #VladimirLenin #lenin

prorivists@diasp.org

WHAT IS TROTSKYISM?

Trotskyism is the worst enemy of communism.

Trotskyism has nothing to do with the theory and practice of Marxism-Leninism.

Trotskyism of all sorts is the forefront of the bourgeois ideology of the denial of communism in the era of the end of imperialism and the victorious communist revolutions.

Trotskyism manifests itself in three hypostases:

i) as an ideology in the arsenal of imperialism in the form of «socialist» concepts and theories of philosophers, historians and publicists — which is designed for the broadest masses, primarily for the intelligentsia and youth;

ii) in the form of leftist organizations — which is designed for politically active youth and the proletarian strata;

iii) as opportunism.

The most dangerous disguised Trotskyism is the dissemination of Trotskyist ideas, Trotskyist deviation, and half-Trotskyism since it leads to opportunism and, consequently, to a distortion of the theory and practice of the struggle for communism.

What is Trotskyism?

It is wrong to look for the roots of Trotskyism in the works or deeds of Trotsky. Trotsky’s activity led to the introduction of the term “Trotskyism”, but not Trotsky gave birth to Trotskyism, but Trotskyism gave birth to Trotsky.

At all times, unprincipled people hung around the revolutionary movement with goals completely alien to the revolution — from overtly provocative or mercantile to adventurous or careeristic. Long before Trotsky, many political crooks who frantically attacked the First International were spiritually Trotskyites; in fact, the modern unprincipled scum who ranks himself among the Communists is also Trotskyists. The main distinguishing feature of Trotskyism as a political phenomenon is unprincipledness. The term “Trotskyism” was spread because Trotsky laid down the ideology of unprincipledness.

In the pre-October period, the ideology of Trotskyism was a frenzied struggle against Lenin, his scientific position and his collaborators. Trotsky’s activity was generated by the situation of the struggle of the Bolshevik faction against the opportunist factions, in which the specific ideology of double-dealing became popular with the oscillating elements. Trotsky, who did not have stable ideas and hated Bolshevism, rallied everything similar to himself through phrasing and intrigue. Furthermore, the Trotskyists have always acted under the guise of Marxists, Communists, revolutionaries, and after the death of Lenin — completely impudently under the guise of Bolsheviks and Leninists.

After the victory of the Communist Revolution in 1917 and the first successes in building a society of the lower phase of communism, the ideology of Trotskyism took shape in its usual present form, as anti-Stalinism. If right-wing anti-Stalinism is the whole openly open exploitative political ideology, then left-wing anti-Stalinism is Trotskyism, that is, the denial of the theoretical and practical experience of building communism on the left.

Processes 1936 — 1938 showed that the Trotskyist «oppositionists» led by Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Rykov, since 1917, were in a conspiracy against Lenin and Leninists. They aspired to disrupt the Brest Peace, condoned the S.R. rebellions and the attempted assassination of Lenin, with all their might sought to impose democracy on the Party in order to undermine the organization and lead the Party off the scientifically substantiated Leninist-Stalinist path. Trotsky himself and his closest employees have been connected with foreign intelligence services since the 1920s, and in the 1930s became Gestapo agents. Under their leadership, the Trotskyists united all the anti-communist and anti-Soviet elements within the USSR, forming a relatively single anti-Soviet underground, and organized many terrorist attacks, including the assassination of Kirov, Menzhinsky, Kuibyshev, Gorky. Trotskyite bandits prepared the assassination of Party leaders and the implementation, together with a group of Tukhachevsky, of a military coup with the subsequent dismemberment of the country. Thus, as the class struggle intensified, the Trotskyists, following the Mensheviks and S.R. party members, finally and naturally turned into a gang of unprincipled and devoid of ideas wreckers, saboteurs, scouts, spies and killers, employed by imperialism.

The next historical form of Trotskyism was Khrushchevism. If classical Trotskyism inside the USSR was defeated theoretically and practically, and in the 1930s – 1950s it was exploited mainly in bourgeois countries, then after Stalin’s death Khrushchevism hit the USSR from the inside. The Khrushchev group that seized leading positions in the CPSU declared the truly Marxist Stalinist policy essentially criminal and unscientific. All that Khrushchev preached was Trotsky’s rehash. Khrushchev’s activities were aimed at shattering the dictatorship of the working class, curtailing the building of communism and the collapse of the international communist movement.

It should be noted that not a single renegade in the post-Stalinist history of the communist movement justified anti-Stalinism with any theoretical study from the point of view of Marxism. Moreover, all of these khrushchevs, mikoyans, togliattis, gomulkas, ulbrichts, todors, kadars, torezes and others were not Marxists at all. After decades, we can confidently say that these people were agents of world imperialism in the leadership of the parties. They initiated and conducted the anti-communist (anti-Stalinist) course based on the falsification of history and the Trotskyist theory of the personality cult of Stalin. Referring to separate quotes from Marx and Lenin, these Judahs and Judushkas, not shying away, of course, from using nationalism, mobilized the party and non-party masses to undermine the unity of the world communist system, ultimately counting on the collapse of the building of communism throughout the world. The anti-Stalinist line of these figures today organically, following the «classical» Trotskyism, merged with the liberal-democratic denial of communist construction in the USSR and the countries of the socialist camp. Only China, Albania and Korea, due to the competencies of Mao Zedong, Enver Hoxha and Kim Il Sung, revealed the viciousness of this course and maintained a relative commitment to Marxism-Leninism.

Besides, Trotskyism was a trend of thought of the Soviet intelligentsia. Even under Stalin, it was not possible to uproot Trotskyism from the educational system, including from the Party, academic institutions and the artistic environment. In these areas, the Trotskyists constituted something like secret clans, manifesting themselves not only in the field of dissidentism but also in the official «Dialectical Materialism», «Historical Materialism», «Political Economy» and «Scientific Communism». Moreover, the activities of the Trotskyists are far from being not only state conspiracies and the struggle for power in the party, but also petty dirty tricks, cowardly injections secretly. Unfortunately, the VLKSM (Komsomol) turned out to be not a forge of communist cadres, but a nursery of Trotskyism and the institution of decay of Soviet youth.

Moreover, Trotskyism became the generator of the content of anti-communist ideology. So, the basis of the modern bourgeois history of the USSR is Trotskyist historiography. The historiography of Trotsky is exposed by the bourgeoisie as the authentic position of the «organizer» of the October Revolution, directed against «Stalinism». Trotsky’s books «The Stalinist School of Falsifications» and «The History of the Russian Revolution» are the first and main principles of anti-communist historiography in an academic form, which is still in service with the world bourgeoisie. All the basic concepts of bourgeois history about the USSR «Stalinist repressions,» «Stalin’s dictatorship,» «cult of personality of Stalin», «collusion of Stalin and Hitler, «the power of the bureaucracy», were created in their works by Trotsky and his henchmen.

History has shown that unprincipledness provides Trotskyism with exceptional ideological and organizational «mutagenicity». The concepts, arguments, theories, opinions of the Trotskyists, as well as their many societies, movements, parties, fronts, internationals are extremely diverse, sometimes they are desperately squabbling among themselves, but they represent an identical quality — the denial of communism in the USSR in theory and practice. Moreover, Trotskyism, in comparison with the other varieties of bourgeois ideology, today is the forefront of anti-communism.

Trotskyism is based on ignorance in theory, fashionability and bourgeois ideology. Trotskyism is not only a political phenomenon, but also a psychological one, a special form of social mimicry, implicated in narcissistic pomp. Trotskyism, like a virus, strikes the most precarious, unstable elements in the communist movement, including forcing them to primitive work, actionism, economism and trade unionism. The left-wing movement of Russia in many respects remains in an insignificant position of insipid, isolated from the masses of the multi-party system due to the infection of Trotskyism in the form of interspersing Trotskyist ideas, Trotskyist deviation and half-Trotskyism.

The low theoretical level of the left-wingers, that is, ignorance, leads to vacillations among activists, and, in turn, to an indifferent attitude towards Trotskyism, indulgence, and even conciliationism.

The new form of Trotskyism is «Shapinism», that is, the concept of «reconciliation» between Stalinism and Trotskyism or «removal of the confrontation» of Stalinism and Trotskyism. To use of Shapin“s tactics is what various «friends» of youth, who rally in their societies the most illiterate, politically naive young cadres, are doing today. Taking into account the diminished influence of traditional Trotskyism, which denies Stalin and communism in the USSR, the position of such Trotskyists and half-Trotskyists is very promising from the standpoint of the growth points of opportunism in the current conditions of increased interest in the Stalinist USSR.

Taking into account the above, we note the need:

I. To wage a consistent and implacable struggle against Trotskyism and Trotskyist organizations. Defend the Stalinist historiography, the history of Bolshevism, propagandize and develop the Leninist and Stalinist theoretical and practical heritage.

II. To wage a consistent and implacable struggle against all manifestations of Trotskyism in theory, propaganda and agitation. Strongly reject all materials containing even elements of Trotskyism.

III. Conduct theoretical and educational work on the basis of a thorough study by all the activists of Marxism-Leninism from the primary sources, i.e., the works of the classics and official documents published in the Leninist-Stalin period on the history of the party.

It should be noted that the victory over Trotskyism as a bourgeois ideology and counter-revolutionary practice, as well as opportunism generated by Trotskyism, does not guarantee the purity of the Marxist-Leninist line and the complete absence of opportunism. Opportunists are also full of anti-Trotskyists. Only consistent ideological and theoretical sanitation against all opportunism, based on the mastery of Dialectical Materialism, the development of Marxist theory and the mobilization of conscience, can guarantee the purity of personnel and the correctness of our policy.

#lang_en #lang-en #marxism #communism #trotskyism #stalin #lenin